Friday, February 18, 2005
This Day:

It is estimated that there are at least 1011 galaxies in the universe today. The current rate of expansion of the universe is increasing, which pushes galaxies away from each other. However, on an intermediate scale (millions of light years), galaxies tend to form clusters. For example, our Milky Way galaxy is part of the local group known as the Virgo Super-Cluster, and will collide with the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) in about 3 billion years.

Galaxy Cluster SXDF/FCC-A (Courtesy: NAOJ)
There is considerable uncertainty about the first appearance of the galaxies after the big bang. This birthday (of sorts) is continuously being pushed back. Recently, researchers from the University of Tokyo, the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), and those using the Subaru Telescope have found that clusters of galaxies were already forming about 1 billion years after big bang. This pushes back the age of the earliest known clusters by a third, and shows that the largest structures in the universe had already started to form during the earliest epoch the astronomers have yet been able to observe.
The above image shows the characteristically red color of the (six) galaxies in the cluster. This corresponds to a red-shift of 5.7, and a distance of 12.7 billion years. The area in the image is approximately 1° square area of the sky, in the direction of the constellation Cetus.
The galaxies are concentrated in a volume only 6 million light years in diameter (the Virgo SuperCluster, in comparison, is over 200 million light years in diameter). The cluster is about 100 times less massive, and the member galaxies are producing stars at 100 times the rate of modern galaxies.
These results were published in the February 10, 2005, edition of the Astrophysical Journal (ApJ 620, L1-L4) and will be presented at the meeting The Future of cosmology with clusters of Galaxies beginning on February 26, 2005, in Waikoloa, Hawaii.

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At February 18, 2005 6:37 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
The universe is quite simply beyond comprehension.

And some would have us believe that out of the near infinitude of planets out there, we reside on the only one to bear life.

Now, you're the number genius, what are the chances of that?

I once read that the chances of the Earth being the only abode of life were statistically the same a flicking a one pound coin and having it land on its edge twenty times in a row.

I think one of the most staggering and frankly sobering facts that I once read was that if we were able to travel at the speed of light, it would still take 700,000 years to travel to centre of our own galaxy.

Truly mind-blowing...
 
At February 18, 2005 10:28 PM, Blogger Sray said...
There are so many factors involved, that it is very hard to get an exact probability for life. The Drake Equation gives an estimate as a function of some such factors. Also, it does not look like it should be too hard to get life started, especially when we talking in billions of years! Quite conservative estimates in the Drake Equation gives a value of 100-1000 civilizations in our galaxy. I am not so sure about intelligent life, though.

The milky way galaxy is 100,000 light years wide. We are two-thirds out from the center, so from us to the galactic center is about 33,000 light years. But that is puny compared to the radius of the universe, which is 156 billion light years!!!

Beyond that, we might have an infinite number of other universes, each embedded in a higher dimensional space, just like our universe might be. We are truly living in a wondrous time, when all these grand questions might be finally answered.
 
At February 19, 2005 8:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia: perhaps I misspoke there. Intelligence is an emergent phenomenon, and is very much in the eyes of the beholder. For example, to me, most of the animal world is intelligent. I should have used the word "Conscious" instead of "Intelligent", perhaps?

We have no idea what form an alien intelligence/consciousnes can take. But as a first approximation, perhaps we can assume they (or some of their ancestors at a certain point of their evolution) would be more or less the same like us in principle (intelligent beings, wondering about the nature around them, struggling to survive)?

You gave the example of "Ants". There is a lot in common betwen us and ants! We are both a) physical beings capable of dying, b) need energy, c) have an individual body/mind, d) evolve over millennia. Which of the above four can be violated by an alien intelligence?
 
At February 20, 2005 2:23 AM, Blogger Sray said...
"Why presume that we would be "violated" by an alien intelligence?"..

Oh no no, not us! I was talking about the four conditions I laid out that are unique to all lifeforms on earth. I was wondering which of these may not be true for any alien lifeform.

Conditions
a) physical beings capable of dying,
b) need energy
c) have an individual body/mind
d) evolve over millennia
 

Post a Comment