Sunday, March 27, 2005
This Day:

Carbon nanotubes are cylindrical chains composed purely of carbon atoms. Due to their unique structure, they exhibit unusual strength and unique electrical properties, and are efficient conductors of heat. The tubes have huge potential in the fields of nanotechnology, electronics and superconductivity, among others.
Now scientists at Sandia National Laboratories have demonstrated that organic nanotubes, married to an inorganic catalyst, can harness sunlight to turn water into pure hydrogen and oxygen.

Water molecules confined in a nanotube (Courtesy: AIP)
Such organic nanotubes are already in use in nature. For example, our blood uses porphyrin nanotubes, which provide the power by which hemoglobin forms new proteins. The Sandia researchers believe they can harness the same mechanism to power automobiles with water. In fact, their laboratory created tube mimics one naturally occuring tube called the chlorosome, which is found in some photosynthetic bacteria! One day, fuel cells composed of such nano-structures might be able to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels.
The researchers were able to synthetically create the nanotubes in an aqueous solution. The tube has two different regions for generating hydrogen and oxygen respectively, in the presence of sunlight. The two gases are emitted from the two sides of the tube, where they can be captured and stored separately.
The next step is to create an array of these tubes, so that it can act as a solar cell that will generate hydrogen and oxygen. The porphyrin nanotubes are similar in size to carbon nanotubes, measuring up to 1 micron long but only 50 to 70 nanometers in diameter, with walls just 20 nm thick. They self-assemble easily (in an aqueous solution, for example) and it is quite conceivable to easily and cheaply produce them en masse.
Further usages of such a device could be in the fields of electronics, photonics, and chemical sensors.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At March 28, 2005 12:45 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting blog you have here :) now will be a regular
 
At March 28, 2005 4:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Wise Donkey... thanks for visiting! Please come again :-).
 
At March 28, 2005 4:37 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia, there is enough power that is available from the sun, if only we could use it.. perhaps within this century we will be, and then there is the fusion energy. Fossil fuels will be obsolete!
 
At March 28, 2005 4:46 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
I think the fusion energy is the best,but we have to find the way to use.By the way pal,thanks aloooot for your link:)
 
At March 28, 2005 4:50 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Here's were combining technologies could reap greater benefits:

I understand that a huge chimney-type structure is being built in Australia.

It's a novel take on the wind farm. The chimney will be kilometer high and derives its power by drawing in warm air at the base and then having the warm air rise through the chimney.

You can imagine that after a kilometer, there's quite a gail at the top.

Inside the chimney is an array of turbines that are driven by the ascension of warm air on the interior.

So, what if the surface of such a structure were to be covered in these nanotubes?

Let's face it, a chimney of such size is going to have a fearsome surface area.

Even in arid desert locations -- such a those where this chimney is to be located -- in the morning, the structure would be coated in dew and condensation.

If the surface of the chimney was sufficiently porous, then the nanotubes would get their fill and the power derived there would augment the power of the chimney.

Just me a speculatin' again...
 
At March 28, 2005 5:03 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks a lot Lemna!! And welcome back :-).

Yes, the fusion energy is the best.. but there are still a lot of technological hurdles there :-(. In the meantime, any good method of utilizing the solar energy seems like the best option!
 
At March 28, 2005 5:07 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: any system that exploits the various energy differentials on the planet would be a good thing. For example, there are plans to set up such a tower under the ocean, where something like a Jefferson junction (current flows along a metal strip which has different temperatures at the two ends) would be set up between the warm waters at the top, and cold waters at the bottom.
 
At March 28, 2005 6:31 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
I think of the benefits to the planet and all of us if we would begin to harness these alternatives to fossil fuels. A much healther place for us all.
 
At March 28, 2005 7:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Agreed, Broomhilda. I cant wait for that great day.
 
At March 29, 2005 4:24 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Thanks pal:)
 
At March 29, 2005 6:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Blogger is giving me a lot of problems too :(.. I could hardly keep any comments at your page, Gindy.

Lucretia: now I will always know where you are, harharhar :):):).

Lemna, just keep visiting! :D:D.
 

Post a Comment