These great pictures are from the SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory website. This ultraviolet image of the Sun shows a very long filament slanting up roughly at a 45 degree angle across much of the Sun, underneath a long and narrow coronal hole (22 Feb. 2005). Filaments are twisting masses of cooler ("only" 10,000 - 100,000 degrees Kelvin) gas contained by magnetic fields above the Sun's surface in the midst of the much hotter (~ 1,500,000 K) corona. Filaments are called prominences if observed on the Sun's limb or edge.

Ultraviolet Image

H-Alpha Image (Courtesy: SOHO, Click images for Hi-Res) This particular filament was already there 28 days ago (one solar rotation earlier), as were the two coronal holes. While filaments are fairly common, this one is longer than most that have ever been seen. The filament is particularly well visible in this H-alpha image obtained at the Kanzelhoehe Solar Observatory.
This video shows the filament virtually unchanged for two days. One (looking closely) can detect (around 10:00 UT on Feb. 22) a small coronal mass ejection as it blasts out into space from the lighter, upper active region on the right edge of the Sun.

Ultraviolet Image

H-Alpha Image (Courtesy: SOHO, Click images for Hi-Res)
This video shows the filament virtually unchanged for two days. One (looking closely) can detect (around 10:00 UT on Feb. 22) a small coronal mass ejection as it blasts out into space from the lighter, upper active region on the right edge of the Sun.
12 Comments:
Actually, it is not a weird question. There are stars whose outputs flicker quite a bit over periods of years, or even days. But it is hard to imagine such a star harboring life in any of its planets.
Such weirdness results from a) Star is near death and cant maintain its output (red-giant stage, mostly) b) a companion star's gravity creates problems c) a very close planet causes problems.
Also, what if a very large meteorite/wanderer planet/star comes very close to our sun? That would be a problem, as all the planets' orbits might go out of whack!
a) 2 billion is unicellular
b) 1 billion is simple multi-cellular
c) 500 million is soft-bodied
So, it is 3-4 times more likely that life never went past unicellular on Mars.
Recent research has shown life to exist in the permafrost of Siberia.
Also, 80% of biota live in the geosphere -- which is rock strata -- rather than the upper biosphere -- the land, sea and air.
In addition to this, bacterial life has been found as far down as 400 metres beneath the sea floor.
This may well point to life existing at a period on Earth much sooner than anticipated...
It is normally agreed that life started on earth 300-500 million years after that collision (once earth cooled off).
Oldest fossils (Stromatolites) are from 1 billion years after earth was created (about 3.5 Billion years ago).
So life started on earth quite quickly, even after all these cataclysms. So it shouldnt be that rare in the universe, given the right conditions...
For instance, there was much more heavy metal kicking around, like Uranium.
Plus, there was a pressure cooker of poisonous gasses, searing temperatures and lethal ultra-violet rays streaming in through the embryonic atmosphere.
Yet life found a foothold and flourished...
There is a theory that life first started near deep-sea vents. There the climate is quite stable (albeit high temperature/pressure), lots of nutrients, high reaction rates, and no UV. Those organisms would be anaerobic, deriving energy from the heat of the vents. Such extreme thermophiles are still found near the vents on earth.
Post a Comment