Tuesday, March 08, 2005
This Day:

The Hubble telescope normally needs three gyroscopes to function properly. Due to budgetary/safety concerns, NASA has decided to bring Hubble down. Gyroscopes are used to prevent the telescope from tossing and tumbling in space. Currently, Hubble has four (functioning) gyros, and the fear was that if two were incapacitated (The gyros regularly break down, and astronauts have already replaced them twice), Hubble would not work any more, and efforts will not be made to fix it. Now it looks like Hubble can perhaps work even on two gyroscopes.

Hubble Space Telescope (Courtesy: Space Telescope Science Institute)
Engineers at NASA have now developed software that would allow the telescope to run on only two gyros, leaving two on standby. The first full-scale test was conducted from 20 to 23 February. The fear was that with two gyros, the pictures will be blurred. But the tests found that the results are almost indistinguishable. This new setup will allow Hubble to stay up in orbit, possible till 2008! And we will keep getting the amazing pictures we all love so much :-):-).

(Hide) (Show)

6 Comments:

At March 09, 2005 5:59 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wrong priorities, Lucretia. Too few people really appreciate/understand/love science and what it stands for. Makes me really mad, and sad :-(
 
At March 09, 2005 9:43 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
I totally agree with you Sray.
The discoveries made by Hubble about our Universe are invaluable...
It's really sad these news and I come the conclusion that people prefer spend money in warfares than Education which Science is part of.
 
At March 09, 2005 12:13 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I really dont understand this abandonment of Hubble. Even from a U.S. policy/bragging standpoint, it will be a disaster. Soon, other countries such as EU/China/India will ramp up their space operations, and U.S. will have to enter a space-race, which will be much more costly than funding the repairs/upgrades on the Hubble now. Damn the short-sighted politicians!
 
At March 09, 2005 5:06 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy, the problem is: there is a tendency in the U.S. congress to start things anew. There has to be a vision that allows for incremental growth. Too often politicians would support a grand vision, and then after a few years or so, cut/reduce the funding, and propose another grand vision.
 
At March 10, 2005 12:00 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Hey pal,donn think that Hubble's discoveries are invaluable for the people...
 
At March 10, 2005 12:04 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna, do you mean that Hubble's discoveries are *not* important for the people (in terms of alleviating their poverty, miseries, etc.)? If that is the case, I agree. But dont you think that even if Hubble (or any other science) is not funded, politicians/society will still find a way to mess things up, and poor will remain poor? So the funding of science is not the problem, the general apathy/corruption/lack-of-direction of the society/ruling-class is.
 

Post a Comment