Tuesday, May 24, 2005
This Day:

Evolution is the ever-present change in traits of living creatures over generations, as they adapt to changing environments. According to this theory, as species adapt, different populations adapt to different local environments, and this leads to the gradual emergence of different species. This process is known as speciation. Walking back in time, almost all modern species therefore should be able to derive their ancestry from a single primordial ancestor. Traditionally, this job is done by paleontologists, who study history of life on Earth based on fossil record, and by taxonomists, who maintain and upgrade this hierarchy of extant and extinct species. This hierarchy is also known as the Tree Of Life.

Tree Of Life (Courtesy: TreeOfLife)
However, a more modern approach is to find the similarities between the genetic codes of several modern species, and then try to estimate their position on the tree. Since the genetic code runs into millions of base-pairs (the basic unit of DNA), this pattern matching is not trivial. Add in the possibility that there might be random mutations, duplicates, or inverted sequences, and the matching problem becomes a nightmare, which requires extensive computing power:(.
To that end, a new supercomputing cluster designed for the phylogenetic research community has been installed at the San Diego Supercomputer Center. The cluster has 128 Opteron processors each with 4 GB memory, and is supported with a grant from the National Science Foundation in support of the CyberInfrastructure for Phylogenetic Research project, a collaboration of biologists, computer scientists, statisticians and mathematicians at 19 institutions whose goal is to understand the evolutionary relationships between all living organisms.
According to the project leader Mark Miller, the goal is to reconstruct the tree of life for 100,000 species or more. In addition to finding the exact nature of the relationships between the species of the world, the project would also develop new algorithms and database approaches, that will have benefits to research related to data mining, protein decoding, and drug manufacturing:).

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At May 26, 2005 12:00 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Whoa! Thats a huuuuuuge task!
 
At May 26, 2005 12:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
So it is!! And it requires huge processing power as well. I did a course on Protein Transcription here in graduate school, and i really appreciated the computing power it takes! And add to that the problem of determining protein folding, and it gets exponentially harder :(.
 
At May 26, 2005 4:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I dont think you can ever convince those who do not want to believe it. After all, how can you refute the mother of all illogic: that god made the earth to look like 4.6 billion years old, and planted fossils to confuse people?!
 
At May 26, 2005 5:05 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I Atheist .. hope you don't mind me calling you that?

I think I might have something that might be of interest to you.

Well worth a read.

While I'm not an atheist, I do question the tenuous grasp that most religions have of this wonderful world of ours...
 
At May 26, 2005 8:02 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: I have read that before, and it is wonderful. I am an atheist, in that I dont see the need of a god to start or continue the functions of this universe. Of course there are things we havent been able to explain yet, but I have full confidence that science will be able to explain them. After all, didnt science already explain so many things previously attributed to divine powers?
 
At May 26, 2005 8:05 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: The goal is to compare both the genetic code of different organisms, and also to compare the proteins that these genes ultimately encode. Differences in our genes ultimately manifest themselves into different proteins, which then influence all that is different at the macro-level :).

The animal is a donkey... and looks quite a bit like me :D.
 
At May 27, 2005 8:10 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
I WAS an athieist, and now i'm what ppl call agnostic. With the amount of info we have, we cant say whether god exists or not. But, definitely, I do believe that there is no need of divine intervention to keep the world running. But, that doesnt necessarily imply that God doesnt exist! God is just like another theory.... only an old one. Science is another alternate theory, but a newer one, with newer observations and more data... and thus bound to be a better theory of explaining stuff.
 
At May 27, 2005 8:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thing is: I cannot reconcile a god (or some other divine being) with the scientific spirit. If there were to be a god, where did it come from? Who created it? So... either you have a infinite hierarchy of gods, or assume that god existed always, or that it was spontaneously created. None of them are in the true spirit of scientific endeavor.
 
At May 27, 2005 11:41 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
The greatest puzzle of them all is the same question be you religious of the inquiring scientist; what made the universe / gods?

But then, this question may in itself be flawed on the basis that asking such a question is entirely reliant on a linear concept of beginning and end, when it may be that the universe, or the container omniverse exists outside of, above and beyond this simpler framework that we humans are more familiar with.

Or I could be wrong.

In either case, I'm sure I've said all of that before somewhere else.

I repetitive of me!
 
At May 27, 2005 11:46 AM, Blogger Sray said...
The fundamental question is: Can there be a effect without a cause? If scientists can find a set of self-contained equations which necessitate a universe that must exist without anything that causes it to exist, then there is no need of a god. But if not, then the question becomes, where did god come from?
 
At May 27, 2005 9:18 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
agrees with Wayne. WE are limited by what we can percieve. The complete picture MAY require more than what we can percieve.

Considering all theories, with an intervening God or not,... of all of 'em science seems to be the best... as it enables us to predict nature, and moreover, its quantitative... a thing that the other DIVINE theories lack at.
 

Post a Comment