Thursday, May 19, 2005
This Day:

The permanent icecap on Mars' South Pole is offset from the pole itself. An interdisciplinary team of scientists thinks it has an answer to this long-standing mystery. Published in the journal Nature, this new understanding about Mars' climate and its polar regions may suggest clues to finding water in the planet's equatorial zone - where it would be easier to land a spacecraft - and opening the door to future exploration and the search for life.

Martian South Pole (Courtesy: NASA)
The southern icecap is made up mostly of carbon dioxide ice - or dry ice - which is the main component of the Martian atmosphere. It is much smaller, about a 10th the size of that at the northern pole, and it is all on one side of the pole. The other side of the pole contains a much larger area known as 'the Cryptic Region,' which is made up of seasonal ice in the winter but has low albedo, or reflectivity. The question was: why is the ice deposition so peculiar?
The scientists were able to use images from the Mars Global Surveyor, temperature information, and climate models to develop a new theory. It looks like Mars has an asymmetrical climate at its south pole. According to the researcher Dr. Barnes, the planet has huge volcanoes and mountains that extend from well north of the equator to the southern hemisphere, and two gigantic basins in the south. The wind blowing over these topographic features sets up large-scale patterns that have a profound impact on the climate. This ultimately causes a skewed deposition of ice, and so we see a skewed distribution of the icecap:):).

(Hide) (Show)

8 Comments:

At May 21, 2005 1:18 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hmmmm. Interesting! There are lots of mysteries to be solved everywhere! I'm still in a dilemma as to which subject to specialize in for my masters course!
 
At May 21, 2005 3:40 PM, Blogger Sray said...
What are your interests?! What do you like the most?
 
At May 21, 2005 9:19 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
I had initially FIRMLY decided on Nanotech. Then somehow, other stuff caught my attention. I became interested in cosmology, theoretical physics, astrophysics and more recently biophysics.

Looking at myself from the outside, i appear to be good at experimenting, especially ones that are used to prove/disprove theories. And I'm pretty much interested in that too.

U have hardly half a year to decide which of them I have to choose. And I would like to join a field with good enough and numerous enough challenges.

The problem is that i dont like anything 'the most'
 
At May 21, 2005 9:21 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
And yea.... I know i wont stick to one subject thruout my life. So, ease of hopping into another field might also need consideration!

Darn! I'm confused again :(
 
At May 21, 2005 9:58 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"So, ease of hopping into another field might also need consideration!"

Exactly. But if you do not plan to hop onto another field, but just collaborate, then nanotech, biophysics and astrophysics are all nice bets! All these fields are set to explode in the next decade, so I am sure you will always have exciting open problems to dabble in :):).

Good luck! And best wishes :).
 
At May 21, 2005 10:54 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
I would hop onto another field only after some 5-10 yrs. I'm not a software engineer who hops every year!
 
At May 22, 2005 1:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I think so. The region has been a mystery for a while, especially because of its weird climatic patterns. You can find more details here.
 
At September 16, 2005 3:48 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting:)
 

Post a Comment