Monday, June 27, 2005
This Day:

A huge milestone in modern science will be achieved if we could master controlled fusion reactions. This is the same reaction that powers the Sun, combining four Hydrogen atoms into one Helium atom, and releasing huge amounts of energy in the process. For example, a thimbleful of liquid Hydrogen fuel could produce as much energy as 20 tons of coal!! Moreover, with fossil fules (coal, petroleum) depleting at a high rate, and their mining becoming harder and more expensive, it makes sense to invest in fusion technologies.
With this in mind, a consortium of six (China, EU, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the USA) have finally decided to attempt to build a experimental fusion reactor called ITER in Cadarache in the south of France.

Tokamak Diagram (Courtesy: MIT)
ITER stands for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. It will use magnetic fields generated by superconducting coils to confine a plasma of Deuterium and Tritium in a donut-shaped chamber called a Tokamak (short for toroidalnya kamera ee magnetnaya katushka - torus-shaped magnetic chamber, first designed by Soviet physicists Andrei Sakharov and Igor Tamm in 1951). The plasma will be heated to millions of degrees, and confined by the powerful magnets so that it does not escape. At such high temperatures, Deuterium and Tritium would overcome their mutual repulsion, and fuse to form Helium and release energy in the process.
ITER is designed to produce 500 MW of power and to demonstrate that it is feasible to generate power from fusion. Construction of ITER should start by the end of this year and should be complete by 2015. Cadarache is already home to Tore Supra, currently the world's largest superconducting tokamak, and some 500 fusion scientists, engineers and technicians, plus another 4000 staff working in other areas. The Cadarache lab, which is close to Marseille, is run by the CEA (French Atomic Energy Commission).
Hopefully, we will see practical applications of this endeavor in our lifetimes :).

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At June 28, 2005 7:51 PM, Blogger KL said...
The current research endevour in this field is how to generate the energy or conduct the thermonuclear reaction in a smaller confinement. So, are the scientists planning to find a path to do so using this larger structure? Also, as you know one of the main difficulties in achieving anything in this field is the handling of all the instablities (Richtmyer-Meshkove, Rayleigh-Taylor, Kelvin-Helmhotz) that arises in in a smaller confinement :-) :-). Do you know any such instabilities that arises when the reaction is done in a larger confinement and if so, how it is handled?
 
At June 28, 2005 9:38 PM, Blogger Sray said...
There are (as of yet) two primary ways of achieving a controlled fusion. The first involves a implosion of a gas bubble by a radially inward shock. The implosion reduces the volume, and thus raises the temperature inside the bubble, which would theoretically lead to fusion. This is more commonly known as Inertial Confinement Fusion. The second technique involves accelerating extremely hot gas (plasma) in a magnetic confinement. Large toroidal magnets accelerate the gas (as ionized gas is accelerated in a magnetic field). This leads to a raising of temperature, and thus optimistically, would lead to fusion. This is the technique employed in the tokamak :).

Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities arise in the ICF case :). In magnetic confinement, there is the problem of plasma leaking away from the confinement volume, thus leading to a loss in energy. The losses occur most in regions where the plasma pressure gradient is in the same direction as the magnetic field curvature. This phenomenon is closely linked to Rayleigh-Taylor instability, as this pressure gradient leads to the denser plasma being pushed through the lighter plasma :):).
 
At June 29, 2005 8:13 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
Why 10 years to complete a proof of concept? Obviously I'm no scientist, but it seems like a long time to me!
 
At June 29, 2005 9:08 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It will take 10 years to build it. It does not sound like a lot of time to me, as a lot of things (physics, construction, electronics, safety, logistics, politics) have to come together to make it happen!
 
At June 30, 2005 3:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am quite comfortable with nuclear fusion. The thing to remember is: there is no radioactive waste! Also, if properly installed and run, it is very safe, at least as safe as fission nuclear plants. There is no lack of fuel (heavy hydrogen), and no problems in transporting it over long distances.
 
At June 30, 2005 5:24 PM, Blogger Sray said...
South Korea, USA and Japan supported Japan to build the reactor. EU, Russia and China supported France. So there was a deadlock. Japan is a good place to build it, but there are problems. First, Japan is an earthquake-prone zone. Second, there are lot more available resources in and near France (world's largest tokamak, as I mentioned in the post, and also CERN is close by). Also, EU offered more money than USA did, so that also tilted in France's favor. But Japan is not going home empty, they are going to have a Director-General level post in France's reactor, and will have a considerable say too.
 
At July 02, 2005 1:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am really not sure why some environmentalists are screaming against the fusion reactors. If matured, it will be the cleanest (after solar and wind perhaps) form of energy yet! And it will last us for 1000s of years!!
 

Post a Comment