Wednesday, August 03, 2005
This Day:

What is information? According to the Webster dictionary, it is the knowledge obtained from investigation, study, or instruction. In our everyday world, when we gain information, that means we have learnt something new to add to our existing knowledge. It seems things are a bit murkier (as usual!) in the world governed by Quantum Mechanics:). Quantum Mechanics describes the world of the smallest, of the Protons, Neutrons and Electrons, and it is possible to have something called Negative Information in that world:)).

Electron Cloud around a Sugar Molecule (Courtesy: Actuality Systems)
So what is Negative Information? According to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, at the quantum level, we cannot accurately compute both the position and the velocity of a particle (say, an electron). When we try to accurately find the position, there will be a large error in (our knowledge of) the velocity, and vice-versa. That is how the sub-atomic world works, and there is no way around it. Thus, there is a fundamental limit on how much we can know about a particle, and therefore about any set of particles. Since we cannot pin-point the electrons (or any other particle), we can only estimate their probabilities of being at any place at any given time, and can visualize this probability as a electron cloud.
However, there are situations when one might be able to know more than they are supposed to:D. The Uncertainty Principle, that stops us from knowing too much, also allows us to know too much for a while, and then let us know too less:)). So, over time, the principle is satisfied, but for small durations of time, you might be able to know more than you are supposed to know. The principle cancels out this extra knowledge by providing misleading, or negative information. Funny thing is: since you do not know when the system is providing accurate or inaccurate information, you do not know if you are getting more, or less:D:D.
This discovery, that quantum knowledge can be negative was made by three researchers, Drs Michal Horodecki, Jonathan Oppenheim and Andreas Winter, of the Universities of Gdansk, Cambridge and Bristol. Their work was published in Nature in August 2005:):).

(Hide) (Show)

2 Comments:

At August 12, 2005 7:57 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
delta x * delta p >= h/2pi; right...where x is postion and p is momentum. somepeople right it as h cross/2 which becomes h/4pi..i used to get confused about it but then it didnt make much different to me atleast then...i left answers with expression values...why would i reach to the 4-5 decimal places for no marks..:D nice article..but too technical to be on a blog thats why u didnt get any comments, seems so atleast to me :D..keep it up. : thumbs up :
 
At August 12, 2005 11:31 AM, Blogger Sray said...
but too technical to be on a blog thats why u didnt get any comments

:):).. doesnt matter :).
 

Post a Comment