Wednesday, May 04, 2005
This Day:

The processes that created our Solar System are quite well understood. About 4.56 billion years ago, plumes of gas ejected by a local supernova (as well as ejecta from other stars, and interstellar materials) started collapsing under its own gravitational force. The central region of the collapsing gas grew larger, and slowly an accretion disk formed around it. After a few million years, the central region got so dense that nuclear fusion started at its core: we had the birth of our Sun. The accretion disk slowly coalesced into the planets and asteroids, and the left over material formed comets and meteors. Now for the first time, scientists have precisely dated the age of this seminal event, and how long it took the gases to coalesce into the Sun and planets.

Allende Meteorite (Courtesy: LLNL)
Chondrules are small silicate spheres in many meteorites, and represent the oldest solid material within our solar system and are believed to be the building blocks of the planetary system. Another common component of meteorites are the Calcium Aluminium-rich inclusions (CAIs). By looking at the content of these two in the primitive meteorite Allende (fell on Mexico in 1869), Lawrence Livermore Lab physicist Ian Hutcheon, with colleagues from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, the Tokyo Institute of Technology and the Smithsonian Institution, found that the age difference between them points directly to the lifetime of the solar nebula.
The researchers found that CAIs were formed in an oxygen-rich environment and date to 4.567 billion years old, while chondrules were formed in an oxygen setting much like that on Earth and date to 4.565 billion, or less, years old. Therefore, it took about 2 million years for the solar nebula to coalesce, and form the Sun and planets, including Earth :):). Also, the age of the Earth is therefore quite precisely fixed at between 4.565 and 4.567 billion years! :D.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At May 06, 2005 7:11 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
1) What tells that chondrules were before the coalescion.

2) Couldnt the CAIs be formed before ethe coalescion........ in oxygen rich environments in the post supernova times.

And yea, i did my exams ok.
 
At May 06, 2005 7:13 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"oxygen-rich environment and date to 4.567 billion years old", "oxygen setting much like that on Earth and date to 4.565 billion"

Do I understand that correct - was there an oxygen environment (environment not= atmosphere) around 4½ billion years ago? Why did it take that long for life to form? What happened to that oxygen in all those years?

And... is this a proposed theory or is there fairly firm scientific support for it?
 
At May 06, 2005 7:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: Good luck with the results :-). Well, you cannot have a oxygen rich 'atmosphere' in space, because of the thin material density. So this material (CAIs) has to be formed after the planets were already formed.

Onkroes: Yes, that is what the scientists are suggesting. And it has been accepted for publication in Nature, and the work looks quite comprehensive. Also, the age of the Earth was already known to be around 4.6 Billion years (through radio-active dating), so this is an independent confirmation.

Also, oxygen is actually harmful for life. Oxygen is highly reactive, and any initial life-forming chemicals would be destroyed in an oxygen-rich atmosphere. Only in later periods, when oxygen concentration went down (as oxygen combined with carbon and silicon to form carbonates, CO2 and silicates) did life finally start. Once life had adequate protection against the harmful oxygen, it could adapt to an increasing oxygen content (brought about by photosynthesis).
 
At May 06, 2005 7:21 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: the chondrules are before coalescion, as there were mixed in with radioactive particles which were dated from that era. Also, there was no evidence of melting and re-solidifying, so it is quite unlikely to be from post-coalescion period.
 
At May 06, 2005 8:46 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting:)
 
At May 06, 2005 1:00 PM, Blogger Dawn said...
Hi..am new here..but this reminded me my geology classes & professors
Thnx, good to read!
 
At May 06, 2005 1:18 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Dawn, thanks for visiting :-).
 
At May 06, 2005 4:53 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Haha! I wonder why, since Bible tells them that god created the universe in six days. How can they then agree about the 4.6 Billion year old Earth, and still rally against evolution? I thought that if you take Bible literally, you have to take the whole of it literally.
 
At May 06, 2005 5:22 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I think it is a fact... but perhaps other independent groups can test different pieces of this meteorite (after all, it was a tonne in weight!) and verify the results.

Also, it reaffirms other independent conclusions, from radio-isotope dating, stellar modelling, and so on. As more such studies point to the same conclusion, the confidence level becomes quite high indeed.
 
At May 06, 2005 9:34 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
At the evolution and bible thing: I think that they feel insecure/insulted when thinking about themselves as descendants of apes. No such feelings for the earth being made 4.6 billion years ago instead of 4000.
 
At May 08, 2005 8:32 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia: I did look into that site, it seems like a conspiracy theory thing! But most of the pictures I think can be explained away in other ways... for example, due to image contrast, shadowing, scale/resolution issues, and so on...

Lots of images... can you point to me some of them that you found really intriguing? And I will try to address those images :-):-).
 

Post a Comment