Thursday, May 05, 2005
This Day:

After the formation of the Sun and the planets from a interstellar cloud of gas, the matter that was left behind coalesced into the asteroids, meteors, and comets, and a halo of rocks beyond the orbit of Neptune (50AU from Sun), collectively known as the Kuiper Belt. Scientists have long suspected that a occasional nudge or gravitational instability (due to a passing star, or attraction by the larger planets such as Neptune and Uranus) could and should push one or more of these rocks towards the Sun. These rocks then end up as meteors, only to crash into the Sun or planets, or get captured as a moon of a large planet.

Phoebe (Courtesy: NASA)
Recent observations by the Cassini craft orbiting the Saturnian system have now confirmed that the moon Phoebe was once a member of the Kuiper Belt. Such inward motion by Kuiper-Belt objects have been theorized before. Most notably, it is possible that the meteorite that helped kill off the dinosaurs some 65 million years ago, was indeed such an object. Similarly, an ancient interaction with Saturn left the moon Phoebe as its prisoner. Before Cassini flew by the moon, little if anything was known about it. During the encounter, scientists got the first detailed look at Phoebe, which allowed them to determine its makeup and mass. With the new information they have concluded that it has an outer solar system origin, like Pluto and other Kuiper Belt objects.
It seems that Phoebe has a totally different ratio of rock and ice, as compared to other Saturnian moons. Its density is about 1.6 g/cc, much lighter than most rocks but heavier than pure ice, which is about 0.93 g/cc. This suggests a composition of ice and rock similar to that of Pluto and Neptune's moon Triton. Whether Saturn's other moons are also prisoners from the Kuiper's Belt remains to be seen.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At May 06, 2005 9:59 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
How big is this thing? Tried googling around. Tried wiki. Couldnt find it! By looking at the size of the craters, i somehow feel its too tiny. How big or small a rock can u call a satellite?

Just looked at the wiki and found that, to date, Saturn has 46 natural moons!(Whoa! I remember those good ol' days at school when it was 18 in our books). Probably its becaue it is quite close to the Kuiper and asteroid belts. But shouldnt Neptune and Jupiter have more than Saturn in that case?
 
At May 06, 2005 10:40 PM, Blogger Sray said...
You can get more details about Phoebe here. I also updated a link to the moon inside the post. It has a mean diameter of 220km, so it is quite small.

Neptune and Uranus are smaller than Saturn, and Jupiter is farther away from the Kuiper Belt than Saturn is. So it is more likely that Saturn will have captured more Kuiper Belt objects.
 
At May 07, 2005 2:08 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting, also on that a meteorite travelled all that way re the dinosaurs.

what abt the asteroid belt near mars, would they also behave similarly.

and why do some hit while others become like satellites, it has to do with size of it or also other factors like its speed, and things like gravitational force of the planet etc?
 
At May 07, 2005 2:17 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
checked the link,
Phoebe was discovered in 1899 !!!
 
At May 07, 2005 6:34 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Asteroid belt objects behave similarly too. They get nudged due to collisions, or by the gravitational effects of the big brother Jupiter.

Abt. why some hit and some become satellites... yes, it depends on size, angle of approach, speed, and so on :-).
 
At May 07, 2005 7:48 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Yea! So Jupiter should have grabbed a lot of satellites from the asteroid belt. That was my point!
 
At May 07, 2005 7:54 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Oh! It was right there on the wiki. What has happened to my searching skills?
 
At May 07, 2005 7:59 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa.. Jupiter captures/captured a many from the asteroid belt. Saturn captures from the Kuiper belt. Nice division of labor, there!
 
At May 07, 2005 1:34 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
So shouldnt Jupiter have more moons because of greater pull? Or is it inversely proportional to mass? Or is the Kuiper belt denser than the asteroid belt?
 
At May 07, 2005 2:05 PM, Blogger Sray said...
It doesnt work quite that way. Since Jupiter has more pull, asteroids have a tendency to crash into Jupiter than go around it in orbit (Note the Shoemaker-Levy-9 comet). Kuiper Belt is more dense, but it is also farther than the asteroid belt.
 
At May 07, 2005 3:09 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Got the hang of it!
 

Post a Comment