Saturday, April 09, 2005
This Day:

Scientists from the University of Colorado have made a surprising find, that if true, will help rewrite the history of life on ancient (pre-biotic) Earth. Published in the April 7 issue of Science Express by doctoral student Feng Tian and associates at the university's Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics with Hans De Sterck of the University of Waterloo, the paper suggests that the amount of hydrogen in early Earth was higher than currently thought. The study concludes that the traditional models estimating hydrogen escape from Earth's atmosphere several billions of years ago are flawed, and about 40 percent of the early atmosphere was hydrogen, implying a more favorable climate for the production of pre-biotic organic compounds like amino acids, and ultimately, life.

Early Earth Mural (Courtesy: AMNH)
If true, this has a lot of implications. In a hydrogen-poor atmosphere, it is harder for amino acids (constituents of proteins) to be created. This has led scientists to believe that life first started near the under-sea hydrothermal vents, where the concentration of hydrogen (from water and hydrogen sulfide) is relatively high. But with a hydrogen-rich atmosphere, with or without a lot of carbon dioxide, the production of organic compounds with the help of electrical discharge or photochemical reactions may have been efficient. Once formed on land, the amino acids might have accumulated in the oceans or in bays, lakes and swamps, enhancing potential birthplaces for life.
The study suggests that the carbon dioxide-rich, hydrogen-poor Mars and Venus-like model of Earth's early atmosphere that scientists have been working with for the last 25 years is incorrect, and the escape of hydrogen from Earth's early atmosphere was probably two orders of magnitude slower than scientists previously believed. According to Tian, the escape of hydrogen was low due to the lower temperatures in the upper atmosphere, and the losses were more than compensated by hydrogen release by the volcanoes.
All this makes the old experiments by Stanley Miller and Harold Urey (where they simulated ancient Earth in a glass enclosure as a methane and ammonia rich atmosphere, ultraviolet light and lightning discharges, and managed to generate four amino acids) relevant again. However, in this new scenario, it is a hydrogen and CO2-dominated atmosphere that leads to the production of organic molecules, not the methane and ammonia atmosphere used in Miller's experiment.
More needs to be studied. Now, we suddenly have two competing theories: 1) Amino acids were first created on land by a hydrogen-rich atmosphere, and 2) Amino acids were created near hydrothermal vents. Only more research will tell which of these (or perhaps both) is the way life first started on Earth.

(Hide) (Show)

10 Comments:

At April 10, 2005 2:16 PM, Blogger Sray said...
It is a very haunting picture, isnt it?
 
At April 10, 2005 2:55 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
A haunting and beautiful picture.

Sray your poem is finishaed and posted to my poetry blog if you would like to read it.
 
At April 10, 2005 2:59 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The picture depicts condition at the beginning of life on earth. It could very well depict the end as well...

Broomhilda: I am heading to your page right now :-).
 
At April 11, 2005 12:32 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
So the various layers of the atmosphere must have been more developed and complete at a much earlier time in the Earths evolution to prevent hydrogen from venting out...
 
At April 11, 2005 12:58 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yes. Also, a lot of hydrogen was constantly being replenished by the volcanoes, so the net loss wasnt great (according to this study, that is). Perhaps we can find some ancient bubble trapped in some stone, and then find out what the concentration of the atmospheric gases were like. Sadly, such ancient stones must be very rare.
 
At April 12, 2005 6:37 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
absorbing. i havent understood everything, but its still very interesting
 
At April 12, 2005 6:38 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
yes the pic very fascinating:)
 
At April 15, 2005 12:53 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Urey's experiment was not a fraud. But it still could be that life did not form the way Urey envisaged. Perhaps life took some other route. Just because we still do not know exactly what that is, does not mean there has to be a god somewhere.
 
At April 16, 2005 12:55 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I know you didnt suggest that :-). Perhaps he was only partially right... but what he did was in good faith. Science operates like that (as you well know). People make small steps (mostly), and some of them are wrong, and have to be re-traced. Conservatives would point to such false steps and try to tear down the whole edifice :-(.
 
At April 17, 2005 12:49 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Suppose scientists are able to demonstrate one way life might have started (not THE way it started on Earth). Will that shake people's belief in god being the creator?

It is hard to show (or make people believe) how life started exactly on Earth. But I think the following things will happen in the next decade or so:

1) We will find a proable way in which life might have started.
2) We will be able to create artificial life, from scratch.
3) We will be able to show that such life, started from scratch, can evolve.

Wonder what the creationists will say after that!
 

Post a Comment

Friday, April 08, 2005
This Day:

Solar sails use the steady stream of particles (and light) from the Sun (light sail when some other source is used, e.g. a laser) for propulsion, not unlike sailboats on Earth that utilize the force of wind to travel. Often cited as the future most economical way for inter-stellar travel, such sails would normally be large, thin, and lightweight, so as to capture the maximum possible radiation from the Sun. When the solar thrust is not needed, the sail can be either collapsed into a smaller area, or re-aligned to present the smallest area to the solar stream.
NASA engineers (and partners) are preparing to test two 20-meter (66-feet) long solar sail propulsion system designs (starting April 18). Such sails can be utilized for deeps-space missions later in this century.

Solar Sail (Courtesy: Wikimedia)
The system designs were developed by two engineering firms, L'Garde Inc., of Tustin, and ATK Space Systems of Goleta, both in California. Their work is led by the In-Space Propulsion Technology Office at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
Solar sails are normally hundreds of times thinner that a slice of paper. Thin, yet durable, the only hazards they might face in space is a random micro-meterorite impact. The NASA sails will be tested in a vacuum chamber that will simulate the space environment. Both the sails will be tested during April-June 2005.
Among the future propulsion systems that are currently on the drawing board, solar sails are the cheapest to implement, and have the greatest potential. Since there is little need for other fuel, solar-powered spaceships can be light-weight. And of course, by 2100, one should have such a hardy bunch of ships, carrying supplies from one space-colony to another in the solar system. Hey, it doesn't hurt to dream, right?! :):)

(Hide) (Show)

13 Comments:

At April 09, 2005 2:07 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
WoW :D
 
At April 09, 2005 8:59 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Space sailing, cool. I imagine I would need sun block higher than spf 45?
 
At April 09, 2005 9:12 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
I've read about this in sci-fi novels for years. In theory it's a great idea, but there are two key obstacles to overcome and it will be interesting to see how the designers of this tackle them:
1/ Punctures : because the sail is incredibly light and thin it is likely to suffer meteorite puncture and even very small rips could destroy the integrity of it and hence the usefulness.
2/ Losing the wind : the solar wind is only 'strong' near the sun, elsewhere it becomes weaker, so a large laser would be needed to provide a substitute, and hence a non-eco-friendly power source.
 
At April 09, 2005 9:56 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I suppose the solar sail keeps preserves the continuity with the past, but as a means of conveyance, you're relying on the elements all over again, and that entails.

For inter-planetary travel, yes. For point-to-point inter-stellar travel, no.

This idea does not float my boat, so to speak...
 
At April 09, 2005 1:06 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wisedonkey: Thanks!

Broomhilda: Heh! But you should be inside a spacesuit, right?

Onkroes:

1) Punctures are a problem. But one might have self-healing sails someday (such ideas are already being floated) and that might be able to handle small punctures.

2) True that it is only strong near the sun. But one could imagine gathering speed by revolving around the sun for a few times (by deflecting the sunlight in the direction of the orbit), and then travel outwards like a slingshot. One you have a gathered a particular speed, you wont slow down (unless you are in a gravitational well), and then again use the reverse technique to slow down near another star :-D.

Wayne: Solar sails can work for inter-stellar travel. You wont have much control once you have started, but if could aim correctly, you will reach your destination. True that you have to rely on all the elements, but you only need the sail during acceleration and decceleration, and during rest of the time, you can collapse it. Perhaps you can also carry a spare one?!
 
At April 09, 2005 4:17 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Europeans (with Russians) are testing solar sails in space. NASA's testing is in a vacuum chamber.

The sails are really fragile (thinner than paper). But space is really empty, so the chance of anything large hitting it is probably very remote. In any case, the technology will take years to mature. Scientists are testing theoretical models now, to see if theory describes how sails will work in practice.
 
At April 09, 2005 5:31 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Not inside my mind Sray, I can sail the solar winds sans suit.
In my minds eye I cam see sailing among the pictures taken from hubble.

Your post has given me an idea for a new poem. It hasn't fully formed yet, but it is incubating.
 
At April 09, 2005 5:38 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hah! A real star-child :-).
 
At April 10, 2005 2:17 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"I was wondering. When will the Europeans try it out?"

I think they are still trying.. there was some problem with the russian craft.. so the mission was postponed. Sometime later this year, I think.
 
At April 12, 2005 12:11 PM, Blogger Sray said...
You should have whooshed past them... that would mess up their sail like nothing else :-D:-D.

Now that you spilled the beans on your alien brethren, I am promptly informing my colleagues at NASA and elsewhere to start putting laser-guns on the sail-ships... to poke holes in the inferior hulls of your pathetic ships... Earth will not kowtow to space-aliens. War!!! :-D:-D.

But ahem, seriously speaking, the technology will surely mature in the next few decades, with advancement in materials science etc., who knows? perhaps take a solar glider one day, and jump off the Martian moons, where the gravity is so weak that we can jump off just like that :-). Then point the sails, and off you go!!!
 
At April 12, 2005 3:39 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Unapologetic atheist: Sagan's foundation did have plans for a solar sail around 2002. I dont think it succeeded, though :-( (can't recall a success).. CMU is trying to do its own solar sail development, so hopefully, that will work out.

Lucretia: I got a bit carried away there :-D:-D. Of course, you are just a carrot. So are your homeys (potatos, beet-root and whatnot :-D:-D)... but I thought they banished you on this planet for being too nice :-):-).

Sagan was cool. We need more scientists like him, sadly they come too few and far between :-(:-(.
 
At April 13, 2005 7:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thank you for comparing me to him :-). I am a nobody... but thanks!
 
At April 14, 2005 11:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL :-). Well, I did write some short stories for my school magazine!

Once I am done with my PhD (hopefully), perhaps I will get some time to write some serious stuff.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, April 07, 2005
This Day:

The Mohorovicic (MOHO) discontinuity (first observed by Andrija Mohorovicic in 1909) is the boundary between the Earth's crust and the mantle. This boundary has been determined seismologically. Oceanic and continental crust are formed by entirely different geological processes: the former is typically 6-7 km thick, the latter about 35-40 km. Now for the first time, scientists have been able to drill into the lower section of Earth's crust, and will break through to the mantle (through the Moho) in coming years.

Earth composition (Courtesy: EJGE)
The project, known as The Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) has drilled about 4,644 feet (1,416 meters) below the ocean seafloor (near Atlantis Massif, located at the intersection of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the Atlantis fracture zone). The seafloor was chosen because the crust is quite thin there, and therefore easier to breach. It took nearly 8 weeks to drill this hole, which is the third deepest ever made. The rock collection brought back to the surface is providing new information about the planet's composition.
The rocks brought back from that depth is already allowing scientists to form new theories and confirm old ones about how the Earth's crust formed, and how it is going to evolve in the future. This study has practical benefits as well: we will be better able to predict and analyze earthquakes once we know what the crust (and the mantle) are made of.
The next step is breaking into the mantle. The mantle material will be evident when and if it's brought up because it will have different texture and chemistry and will contain different proportions of minerals compared with rock in the crust.

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At April 08, 2005 10:23 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
Interesting:)
 
At April 08, 2005 12:47 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yes, it is!
 
At April 08, 2005 1:05 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Evidently my father lied to me, if I keep digging I guess I won't end up in China. lol
 
At April 08, 2005 2:07 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Broomhilda: Well, your father didnt lie. Only thing is: you need some pretty strong stuff to line up the bore-hole... else it will collapse in a fraction of a second!

Gindy: I think it is safe. The worst that can happen is the hole-wall might collapse under the huge pressures. The hole is not that wide - about a meter or so.
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, April 06, 2005
This Day:

Sony has patented a device for transmitting sensory data directly into the human brain. The technique is completely non-invasive. As reported by New Scientist, the device fires pulses of ultrasound at the head to modify firing patterns in targeted parts of the brain, creating "sensory experiences" ranging from moving images to tastes and sounds.

Choice is an illusion (Courtesy: Matrix)
Sony is (understandably) quite tight-lipped about this. Current methods of non-invasive manipulation of the brain remains crude, since magnetic/electric fields cannot be focussed on single cells/neurons in the brain, without affecting the neighboring cells as well. However, independent researchers, like Niels Birbaumer, a pioneering neuroscientist at the University of Tübingen in Germany says he has looked at the device, and found it plausible.
If this is true, and if the device has sufficient focus and resolution, it will have huge applications, and consequences. On the positive side, there will be applications in medicine, recreation (something like Holodeck from StarTrek comes to mind) and immersive scientific visualizations and simulations. On the negative side, I am sure the military would like to have a go at this (good for torture, brainwashing, the whole nine yards).
I am keeping my fingers crossed! :):)

(Hide) (Show)

13 Comments:

At April 07, 2005 6:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Sony will rule the world :-D... you will happily subscribe to all their schemes...

But seriously, if this technology matures (theoretically, it is not impossible), I can imagine people getting addicted to it like never before. Combined with really powerful processors capable of creating near-real simulations, the only limit is your imagination.
 
At April 07, 2005 6:56 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Ah, I was wondering who would raise that issue first :-). But, there are always nefarious applications with anything... the good ones always outweigh the bad ones, though!
 
At April 07, 2005 6:58 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks for the patent link! For those who cannot select the url-text (as it goes beyond the window), you can get the patent here.
 
At April 07, 2005 7:30 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've just been reading about this.

As a technique, it's far too indiscriminate and crude.

I know that DARPA have been exploring the full-blown mechanics used in The Matrix; connecting and interfacing directly with the brain stem...
 
At April 07, 2005 7:55 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Connecting to the brain-stem... that is what the matrix-movie did. But it will be good to have something that is non-invasive, even if it is not totally immersive.
 
At April 07, 2005 11:43 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
I find the wole idea of direct data transfer to be exciting and frightening at the same time. The possibility to learn at an accelerated rate is what really excites me. The addicitive possibilities scare me. It would have to non-invasive for me to give it a whirl, although I don't know if the technology will advance enough in my lifetime, maybe in the next one.
So Sray, when are you going to pay a visit to the Chicago area? lol.
 
At April 07, 2005 11:55 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Direct data transfer might not be possible, though. We understand little about how memory is stored. In any case, memory is formed through chemical processes, which might have a maximum speed-limit! There are people who have photographic memory, but that might be because of some physical quirkness in their brain...

Hmmm.. visiting Chicago... I went there in 2003... will let you know before I go there again, now that I know I wont be duct-taped :-D:-D:-D.
 
At April 07, 2005 2:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
But I dont think this technology will mature so soon. And there are worrying implications about everything... so lets wait and see :-).
 
At April 07, 2005 4:44 PM, Blogger Ostrich said...
I Recall "Jennifer Government" and shudder.
 
At April 07, 2005 6:59 PM, Blogger Sray said...
But that is just a simulation, right? This technology, if matured, can be so much worse!

By the way, Ostrich, long time no see? :-):-).
 
At April 08, 2005 3:21 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
well this is mindblowing :D

But if it can be misused it just means we should plug the loopholes, not say no to the technology.

but porn industry benefitting from it??? well another loophole which can be plugged?
 
At April 08, 2005 4:12 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It would be fun though. Just imagine all the places you never visited.. switch on the machine and wham! There you are :-D.
 
At April 10, 2005 4:56 PM, Blogger Sray said...
People with serious heart problems should not play video-games with this technology.
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, April 05, 2005
This Day:

The Spirit and Opportunity rovers, developed by NASA, have been working on Mars for more than a year now. During this time, the rovers have uncovered tell-tale signatures of past volcanic and oceanic activities by studying the various rocks littering the Martian surface. The prospect of finding past/present life on Mars have never been better, and to that end, scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory, University of Idaho, and University of Montana are developing a chemical guidebook as part of what they hope will be a definitive method to determine whether extraterrestrial rocks have ever harbored life.

Spirit Rover (Courtesy: NASA)
At a fundamental level, all organisms consume resources, and give out waste products. By studying a rock's composition, scientists hope to find signatures of such microbial (or otherwise!) activity within it. The team is using a specialized mass spectrometer to take chemical images of microbes and rocks under conditions close to what might be found on Mars, as well as developing a fuzzy logic computer program to decipher those spectral pictures. By testing and examining local exotic microbes (extremophiles), they expect to develop a guide-book that might point to rocks which might exhibit traces of past or present life.
The scientists will take advantage of two sophisticated research tools:
a) On the hardware side, the LOCI (Laser and Optical Chemical Imager) combines a laser with a mass spectrometer. Already part of the rover repertoire, the laser evaporates the rock surface, and the spectrometer analyses the gas cloud that is formed. Scientists can then study the spectral image to determine what the surface layers were made of – minerals such as iron, say, with a sprinkling of microbial waste products.
b) On the software side, a fuzzy logic computer program called the SIDIE (Spectral IDentification Inference Engine) would supply the Mars rover with some extra brains. Developed at the Idaho National Laboratory, SIDIE uses an open-ended reasoning approach that mimics a human's decision-making abilities and learning.
Thus combined, the two innovations might be able to point to rocks that have a curious chemical signature that might be the product of activities similar to what we call, life! Another bit of good news: NASA has recently extended the operations of the rovers to September 2006; so scientists will be able to test the new software on the rovers to see if they can find some such evidence of past or present life :):).

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At April 06, 2005 4:00 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Me too. And Mars is more interesting than the Moon any day :-D.
 
At April 06, 2005 7:46 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Way more interesting than the moon!
I still think that we are the Martians. Life developed there first, as the planet began to die, Earth was seeded so that life would survive. That's just my theory.
 
At April 07, 2005 4:10 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
fascinating:)
 
At April 07, 2005 5:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wow... a lot of comments :-D, let me answer one by one.

Broomhilda: You might be right, you know! There is one theory that life first started on Mars, and then a volcanic eruption or meteor impact threw a rock(s) into orbit (which had some biological material in it). This rock(s) came to Earth and seeded life here. It has not been disproved yet, so who knows?!

Un-apologetic Atheist: I agree with you wholeheartedly. NASA is the spark that has given birth to many a technologies. People do not always understand that space research is not only for space.. it has huge benefits on Earth as well!
About private ventures, the more the better. Soon these private ventures will get corporations behind them (Virgin Galactic, for example), and that will bring in the shareholders and the common man who will have a direct stake and say in what is going on. I think that is a good thing to have.
On the sad side, NASA has become too politicized. I would like to see NASA to be a semi-autonomous body.. getting part of the funds from the government, but also able to launch private ventures or collect money by selling/licensing (unclassified) technologies.

Gindy: Are you talking about The Martian Chronicles?
Abt. private ventures, again, whenever you involve laymen and women directly (through shareholding), the industry will be propelled in the right direction. Large groups of people often come to a right solution (given that there is no noticeable bias) even though an individual might not.

Lucretia: I personally think the rover-time should be extended as long they work! But they might cut funding for the voyagers.. and that makes me hopping mad :-(.

Wise Donkey: Yup! You have seen nothing yet :-D.

Ok, off to work, and perhaps writing a new post :-):-).
 

Post a Comment

Monday, April 04, 2005
This Day:

Scientists at Texas Tech University's Institute of Environmental and Human Health have developed a new composite cotton fabric they say will protect against biological and chemical agents.
The new fabric, which has been developed with the U.S. Department of Defense in mind, can be used as a wipe to remove dangerous contaminants from a variety of surfaces, including human skin and intricate equipment on fighter planes. The fabric is lightweight, soft, flexible and able to be draped over unusually shaped objects.

Cotton Plant (Courtesy: Robert Underwood)
The material neutralizes and absorbs toxic chemicals used in chemical warfare and pesticides. Another use could be the inner lining of a protective suit. The fabric passed tests for bacteria, yeast, fungus and mold but has not been tested for anthrax and other potentially deadly biological agents. But enzymes specifically targeting a particular agent can be applied.
Currently, the suits used by the U.S. military are made from carbon, which leaves skin and other surfaces dirty. This cotton allows air to pass to the skin, but blocks the larger toxic molecules. Apart from the military uses, perhaps such cotton can also be used to filter out germs and other toxins from water, thus helping eradicate water-borne diseases in the world.

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At April 05, 2005 3:41 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"isn't it too late if it is being used to wipe away or absorb contaniments?"

Not if you are clearing away exposed surfaces (say after a chemical leak).
 
At April 06, 2005 6:58 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
"The fabric is lightweight, soft, flexible and able to be draped over unusually shaped objects."

Cotton, basically! ;-p
 
At April 06, 2005 7:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Heh! That was to show that this cotton behaves exactly like the cotton we know :-).
 
At April 07, 2005 4:18 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
WoW :)

there was somethin i saw about USA Army uniform which will take the color of environment, and more stronger etc, for combat, i forget the scientific words for it.

will both be combined or will have it different purposes?
 
At April 07, 2005 4:49 AM, Blogger Sray said...
That they ar etrying to achieve by using small cameras which will take the picture of the surroundings, and allow nano-pigments/light to color the uniforms to blend with the surroundings!

But this is different... both of these are in development stages, and if required, perhaps they can combine it.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, April 03, 2005
This Day:

A comprehensive comparison between the genomes of humans, rats, and chimpanzees have turned up dozens of new genes on the X chromosome (One of the sex chromosomes, the other is Y). The new genes sit in regions tied to X-linked mental retardation syndromes, which appear only in boys, and other disorders. The team includes scientists from India (Institute of Bioinformatics, Bangalore) and USA (Johns Hopkins), and the results appear in the April issue of the journal Nature Genetics.

X And Y chromosomes (Courtesy: Futura Sciences)
For 18 months, 26 Indian scientists pored through the publicly available sequence of the X chromosome (information generated by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in England and others) to identify genes and other important parts of its DNA. Of particular interest were regions of DNA which encode proteins: the scientists compared similar regions between mice, humans and chimps. They found 43 new gene-structures that encode proteins, some of which lie in regions that are already tied to genetic diseases such as mental retardation, among others. Almost half of the new genes don't look like any previously known genes, nor do they look like each other.
The benfit of such a comprehensive study would be enormous. Similar comparisons can be done for other chromosomes as well, thus giving scientists a new way of comparing similar diseases between different species. As a side benefit, this will also allow evolutionary biologists to compare protein encoding techniques between species and better decipher the evolutionary tree of life.

(Hide) (Show)

12 Comments:

At April 04, 2005 2:46 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting:)
 
At April 04, 2005 6:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
By the way, since women have two X chromosomes, and men only have one, men might be more susceptible to these diseases.
 
At April 04, 2005 2:57 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Oh dear, that might make you a bit like lemmings? lol. Stay away from gymnastic compitions Sray.

On a serious note, lets hope that is opens the way to identifying the way in which these diseases work, there by enabling a cure to be found.
 
At April 04, 2005 4:44 PM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL.. actually, I used to do a bit of gymnastics when I was young... but never had the fun the lemmings had in your animation :-D...

Yeah, lets hope they find all the cures soon... we all want to be healthy till 2100, dont we?!
 
At April 05, 2005 1:32 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
I've missed many of nice posts of urs pal,shit!April fool has fooled me!!!!!:D
 
At April 05, 2005 3:15 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna, you can always read my old posts... they are all still there :D:D.

It was fun fooling you :):):)... now wait for the next time (you wont have to wait for the next April 1st, I promise you that!).. heeeheee...
 
At April 05, 2005 6:09 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:((:((:((
No matter!So you see this is life,foolin' 'n learnin' life!:D
Each day 1000000 times of gettin' fooled for me!!!!:D
 
At April 05, 2005 6:10 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
But I donn know why others try to make a fool a fool again?!
 
At April 05, 2005 6:11 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
So you see,they have got fooled by me too!:)For tryin' useless thing which will never answer!
 
At April 05, 2005 8:12 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Many people got fooled that day (shh... I have a hidden statcounter on that page :-D)... but you were the only one who admitted she was fooled.

That is why fooling you is so much fun... we enjoyed the innocence of your responses after you got fooled :-).
 
At April 07, 2005 7:11 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Dear dear Sray,So scientists have fooled you in April by their publish pal!!:D But I wanna say somethin',donn think of these pal,live as you have to!Cuz if you think of somethin',it'll come through you pal:D:D:D So let it be!'N a question,do you really wish for long life?If yes,why?Cuz I donn even think of that!:)
 
At April 07, 2005 11:58 AM, Blogger Sray said...
My dear Lemna, I would like a long life, only if I can spend with my dear friends and family. And you are so young now, so many things to see, to experience, to love, to taste/feel/enjoy/experience, why dont you think of a long life?!

But well, life is very frail... I might die tomorrow, who knows? So make the best of the time you have, and dont spend thinking about the death :-D:-D. Have fun, and take care of yourself and your close ones :-):-).
 

Post a Comment