Saturday, May 14, 2005
This Day:

This has been happening all over the world. Be it the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze river in China, Sardar Sarovar Dam on the Narmada river in India, or the Sivand Dam across Bolaghi gorge in Iran, such giant projects often have the effect of destroying/submerging historical sites of immeasurable value:(. Archaeologists often have to rush to save whatever little they can, before water washes away priceless artifacts (See one of my old posts on Iran's Sivand dam here). A similar situation has arisen in South Eastern Turkey, where a massive dam on the Tigris River threatens to submerge Hasankeyf, a site of great historic importance.

Piers of a 12th Century Bridge at Hasankeyf (Courtesy: RiverNet)
An international campaign halted the project in 2002. But the project has been restarted, and it is part of the Greater Anatolia Project, a series of hydroelectric plants and dams, and is all the more controversial because of its location in the predominantly Kurdish south-east of Turkey.
Hasankeyf was an important crossroads between East and West, occupied by nine major civilisations from the Assyrians to the Ottomans. If the dam goes ahead the whole town will be submerged with the exception of the citadel, perched on top of the cliffs. Among the losses will be the Sultan Suleiman Mosque, the minaret of which is one of the most outstanding examples of early 15th-century Ayyubid architecture; the cylindrical tomb of Zeynel Bey, a rare example of Central Asian style architecture in Anatolia; and the tomb of the holy Imam Abdullah, grandson of Cafer-i Tayyar, uncle of the prophet Mohammed, a shrine visited by about 30,000 Shia pilgrims each year.
True, that human progress must go on. But there is often a lack of concern for historical ruins, as developing nations are going on the fast track to develop dams, and blow up mountains, all in the name of progress. As with the developed countries in the 18th and 19th centuries, this can only lead to a further loss to our common heritage:(:(.

(Hide) (Show)

19 Comments:

At May 16, 2005 3:24 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I know :(. But what can international sites do? Turkey is a sovereign country, and in the end, if a country does not want to protect its heritage, there is not much anyone from outside can/could do...
 
At May 16, 2005 4:29 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Hemm,you know,politicians come and go,many different kinds of people with variable ides come and go,somebody may like the ancient structures,else will like the modern ones,we can't stop it,but i think it is a country's heritage that gives it essense and identity,we all are responsible for it,but no way to cut the changes,we can do only our share...we can have NGO's for protecting them in our country...
 
At May 16, 2005 4:42 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Why are you annoyed my dear pal???
 
At May 16, 2005 8:08 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
There should be some international law against such things. And I wonder how they ever got over relegious fanatics who would oppose the submerging of the piligrim sites!
 
At May 16, 2005 8:14 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: You are exactly right. If we lose our heritage, then there is we have cut out our identity, history, our sense of ourselves. I agree that progress is necessary, but... surely a better plan can be devised that can be best of both worlds?

Sudhir: Laws dont help. What do you propose if a country breaks this law?! Put sanctions against it?! This is a question of awareness. If a country doesnt/cant protect its own heritage, no one else will.
 
At May 16, 2005 11:28 AM, Blogger Akruti said...
SRay,i need a help if u dont mind,how do i get the smileys in my blogpsots as u do? i am no good at HTML coding,can u tell me how i can do it? plz,if u dont mind:) thanks
 
At May 16, 2005 12:57 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Whats wrong in putting sanctions against such countries?
 
At May 16, 2005 2:35 PM, Blogger Jim V. said...
Just a quick question. Where does one draw the line between preserving heritage and providing for the needs of the citizens?
 
At May 16, 2005 2:48 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Neelima: I use a lot of javascript to do that, and that would requrire a number of changes in your template. Let me if you want to do that. Else, you can do one easy thing, something like this.

1) Whenever you want to put a smiley, check this Yahoo Emoticon page.
2) Say you want to add a smile icon. Just add that image to your post, by putting a link!

If you want to do a javascript version, I can give you my code, and some directions. But you have to make some changes in your template!
 
At May 16, 2005 2:51 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: Sanctions often create problems only for the common man, and not for the lawmakers. And they often have an adverse result: people dig in their heels when berated by foreigners, and no good is done.

Gindy: Yaa. It happened a lot in Europe and USA too. Progress comes with a lot of price :(.

Jim: Welcome to my page :). I guess there is no concrete line. But both sides have to discuss the issues in good faith.
 
At May 16, 2005 3:30 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
SRay,i am not good at all with javascript,i am a finance lecturer:( but i would love to use emoticons.i am not sure if i understood but i am going ot try with a test post.if not then i would bother u again.Hope u dont mind.Thanks a ton
 
At May 16, 2005 7:18 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Neelima, I have mailed you about this. Hope that helps... and if not, please ask me again! I dont mind it at all :).
 
At May 16, 2005 10:39 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Agrred with sray! Sanctions dont affect the policy makers. It only makes the innocent suffer.

Arent they even bothered about losing tourists?
 
At May 16, 2005 11:12 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The hydroelectric benefits this will bring will be more than any tourism revenue, I am sure. But.... ah well!
 
At May 17, 2005 12:20 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Normal?!BE happpppy if not i will kill u!got it?!
 
At May 17, 2005 12:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Ok ok, how is my current mood? Will it do?! ;);)
 
At May 17, 2005 1:02 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:))*U*U:D
 
At May 17, 2005 1:10 AM, Blogger Sray said...
:))... you too :D:D.
 
At May 18, 2005 7:17 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa.. this has happened and is happening the world over. And with the rate of progress, it might only increase! It is time for the world to get together and solve this mess, but.... :(:(.
 

Post a Comment

Friday, May 13, 2005
This Day:

We sense the world around us through our eyes, ears, nose, and skin. We might not always realize it, but the skin is the largest sensor of them all! We feel the environment through our skin, grasp objects, sense heat/cold/air, and interact with others. So it is only natural to design a similar structure for robots:). Goddard technologist Vladimir Lumelsky is developing a high-tech, sensor-embedded covering artificial skin for robots, which will allow them to sense the surroundings in a much more 'human' way.

Robot Skin (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
The future lies with the robots who can interact with the environment like we humans do. For example, in space, robotic arms are increasingly being used to position satellites, and repair/upgrade the International Space Station. The system needs to know if any part of the arm has collided with any object, and an artificial sensor skin is the best solution.
The idea is to develop a "sensitive skin" that technicians could use to cover a robot. This skin will include more than 1,000 infrared sensors that would detect an object, and send the information to the robot's brain. The brain would digest the information, apply reasoning and react within milliseconds by directing the robot to move. Future skin prototypes likely will have a higher density of sensors on the skin, which will provide the robots with even greater dexterity.
There are a lot of challenges. First, the skin has to be durable, and be able to handle high levels of radiation. It has to be flexible and light-weight. It also has to be able to suffer losses, and still work. The technology is not there yet, but scientists are getting closer:):).

(Hide) (Show)

3 Comments:

At May 15, 2005 1:32 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
The skin will be frequently damaged. It will need regeneration like humans. Tiny reproducing bots as the one u mentioned earlier, wud fit the job.

Yea.... Never realized the importance of a sensor skin for a robot!

Yayy! exams over! Will haunt ur site daily!
 
At May 15, 2005 11:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: Agreed. But unless robotic consciousness develops, we wont have Asimov's robots!

Sudhir: Keep haunting :D:D.
 
At May 16, 2005 1:54 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Unless consciousness is a emergent phenomenon, it is unlikely to happen with more and more complex machines. Perhaps something totally new is at work in our brain, and we need to understand that.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, May 12, 2005
This Day:

NASA's Cassini spacecraft has been surveying the Saturnian system for some months now. The spacecraft has already sent delightful pictures of Saturn and its moons, discovered new moons, confirmed several conjectures about Saturn, and opened up new mysteries. Currently, the craft is taking pictures of the majestic rings of Saturn, and in a spectacular way, it has discovered a new moon hidden in a gap in the planet's outer A ring :). The moon, previously conjectured and named as S/2005 S1, was first seen in a series of time-lapse sequence of images earlier this month.

Lunar Waves (Courtesy: JPL)
The gravitational forces of the moon causes tiny ripples in the neighboring rings, as can be seen in the above image. The moon clears a path through the Keeler gap, which is located about 250 kilometers inside the outer edge of the A ring. The moon is about 7 kilometers across and reflects about half the light falling on it.
The wave pattern will allow scientists to determine the mass and orbital information of the moon, and the material that the rings themselves are composed of. It will also allow scientists to see how the other moons are perhaps affecting the orbit of this moon. But studying all this, the scientists will also be able to learn how our solar system might have evolved out of an ancient nebula, some 4.6 Billion years ago. And of course, a new moon is always a cause for celebration :):).

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At May 14, 2005 12:26 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
beautiful and surprisingly amaizing what these new equipaments can find!
A tiny ball in the middle of giant rings...
By the way, while I was in Rio I went to a very interesting place that reminded me a lot of you - Planetarium of Rio . A little detail: I've not been to the local one here!
By the way, have you heard about Cesar Lattes? He died this year, one of our most famous physicists...Well, Brasil beyond beach and football...
All the best ! :-)
 
At May 14, 2005 12:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I deleted your duplicate comment :-).

Yaa... I have heard of him, but didnt know he died :(. He was a great particle physicist.

I have been to a couple of Planetariums out here (Hayden Planetarium) and they are one my most favorite places. Woww.. I love them, simply love them :):):).

Well, Brazil also has the Amazon... would love to go there some day :).
 
At May 14, 2005 2:46 PM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:DHow can you have posts these days pal?!
 
At May 14, 2005 4:18 PM, Blogger Sray said...
You know.. it doesnt take much time to post :-).. say about half an hour :). So I can squeeze in this much time, even when I am away from campus :).
 
At May 15, 2005 1:26 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Wow! That was amazing!
 
At May 15, 2005 3:03 PM, Blogger Onkroes said...
When is a moon not a moon?

Serious question: how large/massive does a satellite have to be before it's classed as a 'moon'? Or is there no official classification?

I agree this is pretty amazing. Is this a 'shepherd' moon? I remember reading something about them some time ago, small satellites that basically keep the gaps in the rings clear by their size and movemement.
 
At May 15, 2005 11:18 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: Interesting, isnt it?!

Onkroes: This is a shepherd moon. Abt. moon or not moon, there is no accepted definition (See here)! Small pebbles orbiting the Earth are arguably, moons :)).
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, May 11, 2005
This Day:

One thing that separates the biological world from the non-biological is its ability to reproduce. All organisms reproduce in some fashion. Now scientists at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York have created a robot that can replicate itself in minutes :). If perfected, the technique could lead to the creation of swarms of robots, with little or no input from the scientists. Once that happens, small errors in reproduction, and a drive similar to the survival of the fittest in biological evolution, might lead to better and smarter robots!

Assembling robots (Courtesy: National Geographic)
The robot was constructed from cube-shaped robotic units (modules) that functioned independently. Each cube contains a microprocessor, a motor, and electromagnets. The magnets selectively weaken and strengthen connections between other cubes, thereby determining where the structure breaks and joins. The growing cube assemblies are supplied with extra cubes at two "feeding" locations. A three-module robot can replicate itself in just over a minute. A four-module robot could assemble an exact replica of itself in just two and a half minutes. The research is published in the May 12 edition of the journal Nature.
Each cube is programmed with certain building instructions, such as contact and release events. Starting with a single robot, it can seek out other such cubes and construct a replica of itself. This process can go on forever, as long as there are cubes left! However, given enough cubes, the robots might be able to reconfigure the cubes into new forms, and hence technically new robot-forms. Different cubes can also have different functionalities, for example, some could be equipped with digging tools, others with lifting tools, and so on. This will be interesting, say, for lunar missions, where depending upon the task at hand, the robots can reconfigure themselves!
The Cornell robot is just a proof-of-concept. More research is of course required. And hopefully, we wont have a breed of super-robots desperate to eliminate us humans from this planet :D:D.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At May 12, 2005 9:06 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"And hopefully, we wont have a breed of super-robots desperate to eliminate us humans from this planet"

At least until a week next Tuesday ;-)


This is fascinating stuff. I always wonder however, just how much the programming directs the reproduction (i.e. if it's too intrusive then spontenaity can be negligible).
 
At May 12, 2005 2:29 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Onkroes: This is a proof-of-concept robot, and has a very rudimentary programming and capabilities. In fact, it is very easy to mimic what these robots are doing, by using software simulation. But the trick is to do it in hardware. These robots use prefabricated cubes, but I really wonder that in a few decades or so, we might be making robots which will reproduce themselves using raw materials from nature. Then there is no turning back, as these robots might turn into viruses, and start killing us!

Gindy: Again, if you read my comment to Onkroes, we are not at that stage yet. But in another couple of decades, with advances in biotech and nanotech and robotics... hmm, you get the idea!
 
At May 12, 2005 4:25 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Well,a few researchs sure scare me. "And hopefully, we wont have a breed of super-robots desperate to eliminate us humans from this planet"
The day will come,we might not be there but then it sure will come one day:)
 
At May 12, 2005 5:50 PM, Blogger Sray said...
But I have to wonder: can such a robot species do more damage to humankind than we have already done to ourselves?
 
At May 12, 2005 6:54 PM, Blogger Phantom of the Blog said...
that is kind of freaky
 
At May 12, 2005 8:47 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hey, but we can improve ourselves using machine parts as well, for those who arent averse of being Cyborgs! Whatever may come, machines will rule the world........ either as a part of us or as our rival!

If these bots get to the nano scale, we could create artificial life. In fact they havve already artificially synthesised a few viruses(without nanotech). And do we call these as machines or not?
 
At May 13, 2005 4:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Nurhan: :-).

Sudhir: There is a difference. We can replace all parts of our body with artificial parts, but as long as our brain is still ours, we are still we.
The viruses are created by resynthesizing the genetic code of existing viruses. So it is a replication, not a new creation. But yes, in a few years, we might be able to create one from scratch, and that could very well be dangerous.
 
At May 13, 2005 5:46 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"We can replace all parts of our body with artificial parts, but as long as our brain is still ours, we are still we."

There are a lot of (otherwise perfectly rational) people who would disagree! I agree with you though.

I think one of the key drivers for robotic technology lies in space exploration. The human body is just too frail and needy to withstand wandering around off-and-on-planet for too long. Add in some artificial intelligence and it could help the human race expand enormously - on the other hand, if the robots are intelligent, then who are they exploring for, and how long would that 'slavery' last? It's a sobering thought that many of Arthur C Clarke's stories may be a lot closer to a real future than we all thought when we read them the first time.
 
At May 13, 2005 10:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Onkroes: I agree too. But genetic engineering might be able to make a new group of superhumans, who can go into space and do things that we cant do. So, there are two possibilities. 1) Engineered humans, 2) AI-driven robots. The third option could be humans in a space-suit with all the advanced features, but it might be prohibitive in some situations.

Lucretia: :)).. I think these things might be in the market soon, as playthings! So perhaps you can get one then :D.
 
At May 14, 2005 9:08 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
:)) wow.
will be goin on a trip so will have to miss your posts for more than a month:( hope to catch up with them when i come back.


===
Congrats on the 100th post:)
 
At May 14, 2005 10:18 AM, Blogger Sray said...
WD: Good luck :):):). And you can always read all my posts from the archives :D:D:D.

Thanks for the congrats :):). Hope I can continue writing this blog.....
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, May 10, 2005
This Day:

Ok, I dont know if it really smells bad or not :D. But scientists in UK have found a 2,000 year old shoe, and it is the oldest ever discovered there. The shoe is made of leather, although the experts don't know yet which type of animal skin was used to make it. It seems reasonably well-preserved, with stitch and lace holes still visible in the leather. The shoe is being studied by conservationists in Salisbury, southwest England, and is expected to be displayed at the Royal Albert Memorial Museum in Exeter.

Not my shoe! (Courtesy: BBC)
It was found when the owners of Whiteball Quarry began working in the area, where a Bronze Age iron-smelting site had been discovered in 1989. Nearby, researchers from Exeter Archaeology found two water troughs, along with two timber-lined wells, preserved by waterlogging and probably dating from the early part of the Iron Age (700 BC to AD 43).
The shoe is nearly 12 inches long, suggesting its owner was male. I am planning to promptly go out after I finish this post, and bury two of my shoes in two different locations. Who knows, may be I (or at least my shoes!) will be famous in a couple of millennia or so :D:D.

(Hide) (Show)

10 Comments:

At May 10, 2005 10:54 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
LOL. I used to bury stuff when i was a kid, for the same reason. But then, i didnt know what was biodegradable and what was not! So all of my stuff got rotten away, when i went to check it a few years later.
 
At May 10, 2005 11:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL! This is a pretty frivolous post, to be honest :-). But we might learn something new about the people who used that shoe, and how far their technology was advanced, just like we learnt a lot from the 5,300 year old iceman's shoes.
 
At May 11, 2005 1:42 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
:))
well i dont think its trivial, think its quite interesting:)
 
At May 11, 2005 3:16 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Yea! Its important to know how we were long long ago. As Churchill once said "The further backward we look, the further forward we can see"
 
At May 11, 2005 3:25 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
I wanted to sign up for the geoloc thing. The pages are all in french. I got it translated using google. but yet couldnt get to anything like a signup page. How did u get across sray?
 
At May 11, 2005 3:29 AM, Blogger Sray said...
WD and Sudhir: Yaa, even though it might look frivolous, it can tell us something about the past that we might never know otherwise!!

Sudhir: GeoLoc is in French. The login page is tricky.. I think they have a daily quota, and if that gets filled up, then they dont allow you to signup :(. So you have to try several times and perhaps get lucky!
 
At May 11, 2005 4:44 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
This was all over the news here yesterday. The continuing jokes started off funny but became wearing after a while.

The shoe, at 30cm is a UK size 10. That's a pretty decent size for a large man today. We 'know' (correct me if you need to) that people have been getting bigger over the years (from smaller buildings, and clothes, etc, that have been found), so it's somewhat surprising that the shoe is so big. Maybe the guy was a giant among his people?
 
At May 11, 2005 7:11 AM, Blogger Sray said...
True that people are getting bigger, but hey! This is only 2000 years ago. Also, he might be a warrior or tribal elder, so it makes sense if he is tall.
 
At May 11, 2005 8:36 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"This is only 2000 years ago."

There are loads of houses over here from 2-300 years ago and the doors are really small (I'm 6ft tall and have to stoop to get through them). And there are lots of suits of armour that would only fit a small man or a child nowadays. There's lots of speculation that it's to do with diet and other 'health' factors, and that's all very convincing. But it stands to reason that 10 times longer ago they should have been shorter/smaller still (at least in Britain where diet's never been great) by inches at least.

I'm not sure they're going to tell anything significant from this find, but it's interesting for it's size. Perhaps it belonged to a visitor to our shores from a land with better diet?
 
At May 11, 2005 8:45 AM, Blogger Sray said...
That is true too. But we only have one single shoe, so it could be of a rare, large individual. Lets wait and see. I will keep following the story :-).
 

Post a Comment

Monday, May 09, 2005
This Day:

Black Holes are objects with such immense gravitational fields that nothing can escape from its attraction, including light. Black Holes range in size from as low as few solar masses (e.g. V4641 Sgr), to billions of solar masses (e.g. at the center of our Milky Way galaxy). Now for the first time, the birth of a Black Hole has been captured. According to Neil Gehrels of NASA, the Swift orbiting observatory detected the Gamma Ray Burst of the collision between two dense Neutron Stars (stars composed entirely of neutrons), which combined to create a Black Hole.

Swift Observatory (Courtesy: MSSL)
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) are the most enigmatic events in the universe. These bursts release stupendous amounts of energy (equivalent to our Sun's total energy output over its life-time) in a fraction of a second. So powerful are these blasts, that if one were to occur within 6000 light years, life on Earth might be threatened!
The GRB created by the collision was seen across the whole universe. The satellite recorded the x-rays from the collision, but the visible light was too faint to be detected by the satellite. But ground-based telescopes were able to see the aftermath of the collision. The collision matched what theorists had predicted would happen when two neutron stars collide, helping solve a 30 year old mystery.

(Hide) (Show)

12 Comments:

At May 10, 2005 12:14 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
is it frequent? - the collision between 2 dense neutron stars, or is it rare?

and the 30 year old mystery being?

(i saw horizon last week on bbc, where they had mentioned gamma rays bursts some years back and the different theories and finally i think they arrived at star nurseries..
are both these gamma ray bursts similar? )
 
At May 10, 2005 12:18 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It is rare, though scientists are not sure how rare. The 30 year mystery was regarding how much energy output would there be, and what the distribution will be across the frequency spectrum.

There are different possible causes to GRBs. One is the explosion of supernovae, which can blast powerful GRBs into space. Another is formation of black holes (like in this post), or collision/merging of two or more black holes. There might be other exotic blasts/collisions that we do not know much about.
 
At May 10, 2005 1:19 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
thanks:)
and btw the sci news links on the page are also interesting:).
 
At May 10, 2005 4:52 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"Another is formation of black holes"

How sure are they? There are a number of very widely supported theories that Black Holes cannot form now because there is not enough energy. And that all the Black Holes in the Universe (not that we know how many there are) were formed at the Big Bang. Could this merely be a Superdense Neutron Star?
 
At May 10, 2005 4:59 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
""The birth cry of a black hole is one way people like to put it," Gehrels said"

Quote from the ABC story. He's the scientist reporting it, and they found it early yesterday morning (not much time for analysis so far then).

Are there any other sources for this story? The story on ABC doesn't give anywhere near enough information, and refers to fairly sensationalist quotes like the one above with no supporting evidence. I'm not calling the guy a liar (obviously), but it is easy to see what you want to see (and interpret how you want to interpret).

Unless there is a lot more evidence, I'm still in the "can't form due to insufficient energy" camp on Black Holes. But I'm prepared to be wrong.
 
At May 10, 2005 5:03 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
black holes cant be formed now???
 
At May 10, 2005 6:48 AM, Blogger Sray said...
"There are a number of very widely supported theories that Black Holes cannot form now"

Where did you get that?! According to classical physics, a black hole would form when the mass exceeds a few solar masses (Chandrasekhar got his Nobel Prize for determining this limit, which is around 5 solar masses). Now in Quantum physics, there are some other constraints, and black holes can evaporate and so on, but no one (at least no one who is well known or peer-reviewed) is saying that black holes cannot form!!

Large black holes couldnt have formed during the big bang, as the universe wasnt large enough at that time to support so many big black holes. There is a possibility that miniature black holes were created, but they are different from the large black holes we see at the cores of galaxies such as ours.

Could this merely be a superdense neutron star? I dont think so, as the masses of the two neutron stars must have already been computed (by the way they revolved around each other), and if the total mass exceeded a few solar masses, they will form a black hole. Also, it matches all the theoretical predictions, so it is very likely that this is a black hole that was formed.

Abt. other sources... check this one from NASA.
 
At May 10, 2005 7:31 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"Where did you get that?!"

That's the problem with not being a scientist, and not being my field, etc. I don't remember the sources! I'll do some digging and see if I can find them, but I do accept what you're saying (I'm sure you know better than I on this one).
 
At May 10, 2005 12:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Amazing blog mate!!
 
At May 10, 2005 12:39 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks! Please visit again :-).
 
At May 10, 2005 1:20 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Couldnt check ur blog for 2 days! Ok.... the solar sail is finally sailin off! Ysyyy!

Hey! Crapper has found his way here!

And is black hole formation the ONLY theory that sez that there should be a visible light after glow for a GRB? How conclusive are these? Saw its article on space.com. Didnt convince me that a black hole birth could be the only reason
 
At May 10, 2005 3:22 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: The science is not yet complete. But the amount of energy that is released can come only from two sources: large supernovae, and collisions of black-holes / neutron-stars. There might be other processes too, but we dont know them yet. If it were a supernova, the light would stay for a while. For black-holes the energy flare decays immediately. Since that is what happened here, scientists suspect a black hole has been formed.

Gindy: First time witnessed, yes. But many more GRBs take place on average than are detected. Pictures: I think they might release a afterglow shot, but since the energy decayed very rapidly, it might not be visually spectacular. But I might be wrong. More details on the burst is here.

NLI: Yaa.. a spoonful of neutron-star matter weighs about a ton or so! It sounds extra-ordinary, but you must remember that atoms are mostly empty spaces (if nucleus is a grain of salt, the atom will be the size of a house!!), and if all space is filled with neutrons, you get neutronal matter.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, May 08, 2005
This Day:

Amygdala is a almond-shaped structure in the human (and animal) brain, whose primary function is to regulate emotions. For example, the amygdala becomes active when we are experiencing pleasure, fear, hate, and so on. In humans, it is also the seat of biases (racial, cultural), as the amygdala conditions our brain to distrust anything that is out of the ordinary. This conditioning made sense in ancient days, when humans used to live in small tribal communities with homogenous cultural and racial structures. Now scientists from UCLA have found that negative feelings about black people may be subconsciously learned by both white and black Americans! The research is among the first to test the brain physiology of racial biases in both black and white subjects.

Amygdala (Courtesy: University of Virginia)
It seems that both whites and blacks demonstrate an increased activity in their amygdala, when presented with images of black faces. Our amygdala also fires up when we see unknown faces, so both whites and blacks were first shown the pictures in another context. So next time when they see the pictures, they should recognize them, but this did not stop the amygdala from firing up when confronted with black faces! This suggests that both whites and blacks feel threatened (typical amygdala behavior) by black faces. According to the researchers, this suggests pervasive cultural cues, to associate black people with fear.
However, the study is not conclusive. A lot of other factors (past experiences, social and cultural differences, etc.) do color the responses. More study needs to be done with larger populations, and with perhaps isolated populations of Africans in Africa to set up a benchmark against which such comparisons can be made. Another interesting avenue would be to test if the response is towards the color of the skin only; for example, by using say black and white cats (instead of humans) to test the corresponding amygdala behavior (if any).
Scientists have only just started looking at the physiological changes that are brought about in the brain due to social and cultural conditionings. More interesting studies are definitely in the pipeline :).

(Hide) (Show)

13 Comments:

At May 09, 2005 1:29 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
agree, a wider research required.

and why just black and white can also try with features like those of asians etc too..

but cant understand why an afroamerican would have increased activity when presented with another afroamerican face. will it apply even if the face is familiar or that of their friends too?
 
At May 09, 2005 1:40 AM, Blogger Sray said...
With friends, it didnt apply.. since people have good emotions attached to friends' faces. But if you have seen a face before, and know nothing about it, it seems both black and white Americans' amygdala reacted simiarly to it.

I agree that studies need to be done with Asian, Indian, SouthAmerican faces, etc. But this is only a preliminary study, I am sure it will be expanded in the future!
 
At May 09, 2005 3:33 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
This is scary stuff for all sorts of reasons!

It's worrying if racial stereotyping is really so culturally pervasive, because 'curing' that is going to be one hell of a hard job.

However your phrase "conditions our brain to distrust anything that is out of the ordinary" caught my eye, because I found myself thinking about genetic disorders and wondering if anyone had considered ways of trying to change the function of the amygdala by genetic manipulation. I'm worried that I may just be showing my ignorance of what is possible in the art/science of genetics, but if it could be done then you can bet someone's thought of it.

It seems to me that this is a valid self-protection mechanism that is being measured, and while it seems to be demonstrating cultural racism, it should be addressed by behavioural modification rather than genetic 'tampering'.

I look forward to wider research, and hope that happens before the rather more sensationalist side of the press get hold of it.
 
At May 09, 2005 7:07 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Well, amygdala serves a lot of useful function too! It allows to be afraid of things.. and not take too much risk. So it makes us cautious, and a little caution is always healthy.

Amygdala is part of the limbic brain, and is present in mammals as well as reptiles. But our frontal cortex allows us to think, and override signals from the amygdala. So, unless we are slaves of our reptilian brain, it really shouldnt create problems.

But when we are acting on impulse, or are too tired, the amygdala takes over, and this is very dangerous, for example, a tired soldier can just kill off everyone without thinking about the consequences.
 
At May 09, 2005 10:22 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:((
I have bitttttten!I donn wanna ittt!!!
:D
 
At May 09, 2005 10:23 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Emm,'n happy new template!!!:DAm I right?!
 
At May 09, 2005 10:49 AM, Blogger Sray said...
New template?! Nooo :-). But I did make some changes to the old one :D:D:D.
 
At May 09, 2005 2:01 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa... there are a lot of things that can be done. But still this limited work is interesting, because it shows that our social experiences have direct physiological observables :-). Brain is slowly becoming more knowable!!
 
At May 09, 2005 9:22 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
It is surprising discovery but remains unclear how the brain works. It's still a great mystery...
 
At May 09, 2005 9:49 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Very true. It is a last frontier of sorts!
 
At May 10, 2005 1:26 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:D You see I havenn made a mistake!I understand the changes!:D
 
At May 11, 2005 4:30 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've often said that racism is an entirely natural response.

And the amount of flack I've got for that in the past is unreal.

Most people seem to assume that racism is largely social conditioning.

While this is true to some degree, this simply doesn't explain racism and other discriminatory behaviour an the larger, global scale.

For any one reaction to be so pervasive amongst types of people, then for me, logic has always suggested that we all harbour the same mechanism.

Now, while people argue that we no longer need this mechanism anymore, I think that what we see in the world around us points to this little region of our brain being exercised now more than ever.

With increasingly limited resources in impoverished nations, western values do not add up to much.

Mother nature does not add useless emotions. We have no emotional baggage.

Every emotion has survival value...
 
At May 11, 2005 5:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Definitely there are evolutionary reasons for racism. Humans evolved in small tribes, where tribal loyalties were paramount. But we do have to grow out of our programming, and not kill, hate, or hurt each other. But, also we cannot hide the obvious truth that each of us has some prejudice built in, which are only reinforced by social and cultural taboos and norms and practices.

But it might be that this emotion has outlasted its survival value. We have developed technologically much faster than we have grown evolutionarily, and so much interconnection between communities is causing friction. We need to acknowledge that, and then work to minimize this friction. There is no other easy way.
 

Post a Comment