Saturday, February 26, 2005
This Day:

There are seven basic units of measurement that we use everyday. In SI units, These are:

Standard Mass
  • Length (Meter): Equal to 1,650,763.73 wavelengths in vacuum of the orange-red line of the krypton-86 spectra
  • Mass (Kilogram): Cylinder of platinum-iridium alloy kept in France and a number of copies
  • Time (Second): Time for 9,192,631,770 cycles of resonance vibration of the caesium-133 atom
  • Temperature (Kelvin): Absolute zero is defined as 0 Kelvin and the triple point of water as 273.16 Kelvins
  • Luminosity (Candela): Intensity of a light source (Frequency 5.40x1014 Hz) that gives a radiant intensity of 1/683 watts/steradian in a given direction
  • Electric Current (Ampere): Current that produces a force of 2.10-7 Newtons per meter between a pair of infinitely long parallel wires 1 meter apart in a vacuum
  • Amount of Substance (Mole): Number of elementary entities of a substance equal to the number of atoms in 0.012 kg of Carbon-12
Only the standard for mass is based upon a physical standard, and not on fundamental physical constants (Gravitational constant, Planck's constant, Speed of Light in vacuum, etc.), which means that everytime one wishes to calibrate a kilogram, it has to be physically compared with the French mass, or with some mass already calibrated using that mass. Now for the first time, the kilogram may be moving toward a new definition based on a universal constant.
A paper to be released Monday proposes redefining the unit via fixing the values of one of two well-known universal constants. The choices are either, a) Avogadro's number (measures the amount of carbon-12 atoms in 0.012 kg of that element), or b) Planck's constant (used to explain the sizes of quanta, in quantum mechanics). As reported by the Wired magazine, the change would mean the kilogram would no longer be known exactly, but would instead be determined by experiments using the chosen defined constant. A definition based on Planck's constant could mean scientists would determine a certain number of photons of light of a certain frequency would correspond to a kilogram. A definition based on Avogadro's constant could mean the kilogram would be determined by a certain number of an element's atoms.
The french mass lasted for about 100 years (first standardized in 1889, kept at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures), and has been the standard for the 20th century. Soon, perhaps, we will have a standard for the 21st century (and beyond).

(Hide) (Show)

2 Comments:

At February 26, 2005 1:23 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I agree... it is very hard to adapt. I dont think usa is ever going to convert to the SI system, even though it is definitely superior than feet and pounds and gallons!
 
At February 26, 2005 4:12 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am a scientist, and it is so much easier to use SI units than foot-pound or even centimeter-gram. Everything is in multiples of 10! Now if only we had 100 seconds in a minute and 100 minutes in an hour... hmmm...
 

Post a Comment

Friday, February 25, 2005
This Day:

These great pictures are from the SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory website. This ultraviolet image of the Sun shows a very long filament slanting up roughly at a 45 degree angle across much of the Sun, underneath a long and narrow coronal hole (22 Feb. 2005). Filaments are twisting masses of cooler ("only" 10,000 - 100,000 degrees Kelvin) gas contained by magnetic fields above the Sun's surface in the midst of the much hotter (~ 1,500,000 K) corona. Filaments are called prominences if observed on the Sun's limb or edge.

Ultraviolet Image


H-Alpha Image (Courtesy: SOHO, Click images for Hi-Res)
This particular filament was already there 28 days ago (one solar rotation earlier), as were the two coronal holes. While filaments are fairly common, this one is longer than most that have ever been seen. The filament is particularly well visible in this H-alpha image obtained at the Kanzelhoehe Solar Observatory.
This video shows the filament virtually unchanged for two days. One (looking closely) can detect (around 10:00 UT on Feb. 22) a small coronal mass ejection as it blasts out into space from the lighter, upper active region on the right edge of the Sun.

(Hide) (Show)

12 Comments:

At February 25, 2005 12:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
I really enjoy this site I must say!
 
At February 25, 2005 12:11 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Komputamuso: Thanks! You are welcome any time, hope to see you again :-).
 
At February 25, 2005 3:17 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks, will try!
 
At February 25, 2005 5:21 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: Just like sunspots are relatively cool regions of the sun, the filaments are essentially cold regions on the surface of the sun. Normally, the nuclear reaction occurs deep inside the sun, and the heat bubbles up through convection. High magnetic fields around the filaments prohibit a efficient convective transfer of heat, and hence they are cooler. As the sun rotates, the magnetic lines get wrapped around it, and form curved lines, called the filaments. Once the lines get really tight and go once (or more, depending upon the slant) around the sun, they might intersect, thus causing a release of magnetic energy in a big solar flare.
 
At February 25, 2005 7:26 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The earth's magnetosphere protects us from medium sized flares. Larger flares often fries out satellites in orbit. Even larger flares would cause increased UV radiation for a while. It will take a really large (unlikely) eruption to seriously affect the earth. But thankfully, we have a very stable sun here :-).
 
At February 26, 2005 3:24 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"What is an example of an unstable sun? That maybe a wierd question."

Actually, it is not a weird question. There are stars whose outputs flicker quite a bit over periods of years, or even days. But it is hard to imagine such a star harboring life in any of its planets.

Such weirdness results from a) Star is near death and cant maintain its output (red-giant stage, mostly) b) a companion star's gravity creates problems c) a very close planet causes problems.

Also, what if a very large meteorite/wanderer planet/star comes very close to our sun? That would be a problem, as all the planets' orbits might go out of whack!
 
At February 28, 2005 8:15 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I think it is a very real possibility. Even primitive bacteria are life. It might not be that difficult to start life from scratch, given the right conditions, and billions of years. Intelligent life, now that might be extremely rare, as the prerequisite for that is multi-cellular life form, and it took 2 Billion years on earth to jump from single cell to multi-cell.
 
At February 28, 2005 1:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Remember that of the 4 billion year old history of life on earth:

a) 2 billion is unicellular
b) 1 billion is simple multi-cellular
c) 500 million is soft-bodied

So, it is 3-4 times more likely that life never went past unicellular on Mars.
 
At March 01, 2005 2:09 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Life may have evolved on Earth much sooner than previously estimated.

Recent research has shown life to exist in the permafrost of Siberia.

Also, 80% of biota live in the geosphere -- which is rock strata -- rather than the upper biosphere -- the land, sea and air.

In addition to this, bacterial life has been found as far down as 400 metres beneath the sea floor.

This may well point to life existing at a period on Earth much sooner than anticipated...
 
At March 01, 2005 2:24 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The moon was most likely created when another proto-planet collided with earth (when it was 250 million years old).

It is normally agreed that life started on earth 300-500 million years after that collision (once earth cooled off).

Oldest fossils (Stromatolites) are from 1 billion years after earth was created (about 3.5 Billion years ago).

So life started on earth quite quickly, even after all these cataclysms. So it shouldnt be that rare in the universe, given the right conditions...
 
At March 01, 2005 7:00 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
It's worth baring in mind that the early Earth was a much more hazardous place than it is now.

For instance, there was much more heavy metal kicking around, like Uranium.

Plus, there was a pressure cooker of poisonous gasses, searing temperatures and lethal ultra-violet rays streaming in through the embryonic atmosphere.

Yet life found a foothold and flourished...
 
At March 01, 2005 7:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"Plus, there was a pressure cooker of poisonous gasses, searing temperatures and lethal ultra-violet rays streaming in through the embryonic atmosphere."

There is a theory that life first started near deep-sea vents. There the climate is quite stable (albeit high temperature/pressure), lots of nutrients, high reaction rates, and no UV. Those organisms would be anaerobic, deriving energy from the heat of the vents. Such extreme thermophiles are still found near the vents on earth.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, February 24, 2005
This Day:

A team of Boston University physicists led by Assistant Professor Pritiraj Mohanty have developed a nanomechanical oscillator (essentially a small comb-like structure vibrating between two anchors). The oscillator is comprised of 50 billion atoms (0.0107 milli-meter). When it is oscillated at a frequency of 1.49 GHz (1.49 billion times per second), with an amplitude equal to the size of an atom, the oscillator displays quantum mechanical properties.
In our (classical) macroscopic world, physical constructs (space, time, weight, temperature etc.) are continous in nature. For example, when we move from point A to point B, we are traveling through all points between A and B. Similarly, when we heat a bowl of water, say from 25º to 75º, the temperature of the water rises continuously from 25º to 75º. However, the world of small (typically, less than a nanometer) is dominated by quantum mechanics, where these common-sense rules of continuous change do not apply. All physical parameters at such small scales behave quantum-mechanically, that is, the parameter values increase (or decrease) in discrete (quantum) jumps. It is as if the water temperature can only rise from 25º to 75º by steps of 1º! Fortunately, this quantum step is usually extremely small (of the order of 10-30), and hence indetectable to the naked eye.
Einstein in his seminal paper in 1905 (on Photoelectric effect) showed that for light to behave as it does, it must come in small energy packets (later) called photons. Soon, scientists such as Heisenberg and Schroedinger developed the new physics of Quantum Mechanics, where everything comes in discrete packets of extremely small size. Under this theory, even space and time are quantized in nature, and at such small scales, particles cannot move continuously from point A to B, but must travel this distance in discrete steps/jumps.
The above phenomenon has already been observed in particles such as electrons and photons. Now the physicists have for the first time observed the above phenomenon at a (comparatively) macroscopic level. In our macroscopic world, we would expect a structure such as the above mentioned oscillator to move smoothly. Instead, it behaves in a peculiar manner: it moves in steps. It is as if instead of rolling smoothly down a hill, a ball is moving as if it is climbing down a staircase.
At the quantum level, energy comes in packets as well. Since the oscillator can only have energy values that come in integral multiples of this quantum packet (you can have 10 packets, or 11 packets, but not 10.5), it moves in steps. Thus we observe (Movie here) a jerky motion by the oscillator.

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At February 24, 2005 4:28 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
This is interesting.

It's almost like crude computer simulations when the avatar would move across the screen. But because the screen resolution was some low, the effect would be that of a stepped, pixelated movement.

Now, to imagine that the same effect happens on the quantum level does surprise me...
 
At February 24, 2005 4:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Exactly! Still, it is not that hard to imagine a quantized energy (which leads to a stepped motion). Weirder still is quantized space or time, which has been experimentally verified to exist!
 
At February 24, 2005 4:10 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: This is nanotechnology. This work should have
a) applications in development of quantum computers (how to manage large-scale quantum structures)
b) design new nantech applications that utilize the novels physics at quantum levels
c) Pure, sheer advancement of human understanding!
 
At February 24, 2005 4:30 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: I should be able to fix something like that myself, thanks! But I do not see the problem happening at my end, does anyone else see it on his/her computer?
 
At February 24, 2005 7:08 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Interesting... I have not seen that happen anywhere.. perhaps it has to do with your screen resolution/font settings.. does this happen with other people who use the same template as I do? For example, this page. Thanks!
 
At February 24, 2005 8:06 PM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"Weirder still is quantized space or time, which has been experimentally verified to exist!"

Do you have links to such experiments? I would seriously like to see how quantized time can be shown to exist.

Surely if a 'step-change' of any kind exists at all, then it must be possible to step-change a bigger step (i.e. jumping several steps). And the logical next step is moving forward in time (jumping a whole bunch of steps).

Taking it further, if steps can be shown to take place in either direction.... well that's perhaps a step too far, but time travel has always been a dream of mankind.

Wonder if anybody is seriously researching it? Probably.
 
At February 25, 2005 5:24 PM, Blogger Sray said...
It could be because of how large the fonts are on your sidebar. One "previous post" entry moved out with today's post (which might have been a long title which caused an overfill). move But let me know if it happens again.
 
At March 03, 2005 2:58 AM, Blogger The Author said...
Wow. Let me say that backwards: Wow. Experimental verification of "jumps" that added together create the illusion of motion: Suddenly I feel like a reel of film.

I thought we'd solved the problems Modern philosophy raised by stipulating a continuum of motion. But this is, er, kind of midway between, say, Xeno and Peirce/Whitehead. Xeno was wrong: You can reach the door.
 
At March 03, 2005 9:50 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Xeno's question was a valid one. But quantum mechanics shows that everything is discrete. In such a universe, there is no real paradox, only that our brains are not wired to accept that reality so easily.
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, February 23, 2005
This Day:

A British-led team of astronomers have discovered the first galaxy completely devoid of stars. The galaxy (which is a large mass, about 50 million light years away) can only be detected using a radio telescope. First captured by the University of Manchester’s Lovell Telescope in Cheshire, the discovery was also confirmed by the Arecibo telescope in Puerto Rico.

Dark Galaxy, Invisible (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
The galaxy (named VIRGOHI21) is mostly composed of hydrogen, and is about a hundred million times the mass of the Sun, lying in the Virgo cluster. Such galaxies have been predicted before (and might outnumber the visible galaxies by 100 to 1), but this is the first time anyone has 'seen' one.
It is theorized that since galaxies rotate at a fairly fast pace (our own Milky Way complete one rotation in about 250 million years), dark matter is necessary to ensure that the galaxies do not tear themselves apart. Detecting such dark matter hitherto has been elusive. The techniques that led to the discovery of this dark galaxy can undoubtedly be used to detect other dark matter clumps in our own galaxy, and beyond.

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At February 23, 2005 11:13 AM, Blogger Salena Moffat said...
Hi :) Followed your profile here from your comment on my Zero Room, and I have now bookmarked your blog. Cool stuff!
 
At February 23, 2005 12:16 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks for visiting! Please come again :-).
 
At February 23, 2005 12:32 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"I hope they explain what caused it."..

Gindy, the cause is not explained. Bu the theory behind it is quite robust. According to the theory, a large mass of inert (no nuclear reaction) gas that is rotating rapidly, fails to collapse under its gravity. Since it does not collapse, there is no high pressure zone created that normally triggers a stellar formation.
 
At February 23, 2005 5:57 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Or, if dark matter and dark energy reside within the galaxy, then their combined repulsive forces will prevent the gaseous mass from condensing.

In my readings, it seems that dark matter is the cohesive force within galaxies that prevents their powerful orbiting motion from tearing themselves apart.

Yet dark energy is the force that seems to be causing the universe to expand at an ever increasing speed.

Surely, if this is the case, there appears to be something within the mass of the galaxy that inhibits the effects of dark energy.

Just a thought...
 
At February 23, 2005 7:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gravitationally, dark matter behave exactly the same way as normal matter, only difference being we cannot see it. This could be because a) The matter is inert, cold gas, emitting no radiation b) Composed of non-baryonic matter (Baryons = protons/neutrons), for example, of muons etc., c) Totally new kind of matter we know nothing of.

For a rotating galaxy like the milky way, centrifugal forces keep the stars from flying away. This force is proportional to the mass of the galaxy, and the total visible stellar-mass is not enough to stop the stars from flying apart. Hence, dark matter is supposed to exist inside the galaxy, (in between the galactic arms).

Similarly, a dark galaxy can contain just dark matter (and no dark energy) for it to rotate. Just that it does not contain any luminous stars, like other galaxies.
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, February 22, 2005
This Day:

Australian scientists have shown (published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) that drywood termites (Cryptotermes domesticus) listen to their wood, before eating it. The termites also listen to the sound they produce while chewing, which helps them detect other species of termites, and help control the development of immature workers into sexually-active breeders. According to the researchers (CSIRO, University of New South Wales), this might lead to better ways of protecting wood from termite damage.

Termites! (Courtesy: NewScientist)
The termites detect sound through their legs and antennae. They choose smaller wood blocks when in a new environment, and avoid larger blocks that are being fed upon by termites from other species. Over time, they get more confident and start feeding on the large blocks as well.
It is still to be seen if termites from other continents make similar sound, or if termites from different continents hear each others' sound as threats. It might be possible to stop termites from doing damage to a house by piping vibrations from another species through the wood framework. This will make the house termite-free, without having to use pesticides! Hopefully, the termites do not have a very discerning 'ear' :-)

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At February 22, 2005 2:21 AM, Blogger Sray said...
They eat termites in some parts of the world. Ummm, crunchy!
 
At February 22, 2005 7:05 PM, Blogger Sray said...
If one could eat shrimp, I dont see how termites are a problem :-). And of course, lots of protein!
 
At February 23, 2005 6:24 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Wow,coool scientific weblog pal,it is nice,I'll start readin' it fully by tomorrow.
 
At February 23, 2005 7:33 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: You are welcome any time.. thanks for stopping by!
 
At February 23, 2005 10:10 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:)
 

Post a Comment

Monday, February 21, 2005
This Day:

Billed as the most important Coptic discovery found since the Nag Hammadi scripts found in 1945, (Polish) Egyptologists have uncovered a set of three ancient (6th Century AD) Coptic manuscripts in a tomb in Luxor, Egypt.

Nag-Hammadi manuscripts (Courtesy: Gnosis Archive)
Copts were the ancient peoples of Egypt. The manuscripts were hidden in a Middle Kingdom (2000 to 1800 BC) tomb, perhaps kept there by the (Coptic) Christians who were being persecuted at the time by the Romans.
Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities head Dr. Zahi Hawas said one of the manuscripts is 22.5 centimeters by 17 centimeters (nine by seven inches) and three centimeters thick. The second has 50 pages and a cover made of skin with ornaments, while the third (which also has 50 pages) is in a poorer state.
The experts will try to decipher the manuscripts, which should shed some interesting light on early Christianity. The Naga Hammadi manuscripts contain a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures; texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define "orthodoxy" -- scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. Perhaps some such interesting documents will be deciphered from this batch, which will open up some new chapter in history.

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At February 21, 2005 1:09 PM, Blogger Sray said...
If they are written in the Coptic language, it shouldnt be too hard. Also, I am sure there will be heated debate about the meaning of each sentence, books/papers will be published, and some portions in the manuscript might have appeared in other documents, making it easier to decipher.

It would be fascinating reading nonetheless, even differing translations should be illuminating.

All these early gnostic texts stressed a direct connection to god. Somehow, the church has inserted themselves in between. Too bad people dont see the irony in a rich church 'spreading' the (so-called) word of Jesus.
 
At February 21, 2005 3:00 PM, Blogger Sray said...
There is no conspiracy here! Once the documents are scanned, they will be (as the Nag-Hammadi have been) put online. You can go to the site (if you know Coptic) and read and compare the translations for yourselves. Anyone and everyone who knows Coptic would be able to put forth their criticisms, as scientists often do.

But of course, you have to defer some respect to the historians, as they are the people who know the most. Just as you would defer to your car mechanic if you know nothing about cars! But you can and should always ask questions, and keep an open mind.
 
At February 21, 2005 4:44 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I'm with Sray on this one.

I don't think there's a conspiracy, here.

I'm very much interested in this kind of thing.

As some will no doubt know by now, I have several issues with religion . most of which are the size of small countries.

But there's no denying the cohesive force of early religion on human society.

This could offer us yet more insight...
 
At February 21, 2005 10:00 PM, Blogger Sray said...
There is a lot of evidence that the early church, in order to consolidate its position, burned/disowned/maligned a lot of authentic documents. This happened esp. during and after Constantine's time. To find documents from that period, is therefore very interesting.

Hopefully, it will shed some light on the politics of the day, or some passages which have long been excised from the 'official' bible.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, February 20, 2005
This Day:

Human beings are often touted as at the pinnacle of evolution. Even if this may or may not be true, one thing is certain; different parts of the body evolve at different pace. For example, one can reasonably conjecture that our brains are at the peak of the evolutionary line. Such a claim would not be made about our teeth :-). Compared to most mammals, human teeth are highly crooked, and disordered (NewScientist). Now scientists have come up with a reason for this: Cooking!

Human Teeth
According to anthropologist Peter Lucas of George Washington University, the evolutionary pressures are different for the front and the back teeth. This, and due to the lack of space inside a human jaw, the teeth are always competing with each other, often resulting in malocclusion. Teeth can be missing, broken, growing on top of each other, wisdom teeth often do not have space to come out! Other mammals do not face this problem. Other primates often have hollywood teeth.
The human front teeth are used to chop food into small pieces. The back teeth (molars and premolars) grind down harder pieces. According to Peter Lucas, cooking has allowed humans to pre-soften the food. We do not require a lot of teeth to cut food into smaller pieces, so the human front jaw has become smaller. But we still need molars to grind the harder pieces, and our jaw is not large enough to hold them all. The "Rise of The Molars" pushes the other teeth, thereby causing the disfigurement, and the pain in the neck that are the wisdom teeth.

(Hide) (Show)

2 Comments:

At February 21, 2005 6:46 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It wont happen in a hundred years.. but who knows, perhaps in a million years we will be so advanced that we wont need food anymore, and will get our energy directly from nature/battery/ambient-heat :-).
Eating food will be for fun/taste, not for gathering energy as it now is!
 
At February 21, 2005 3:02 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Another possibility is that there is no evolutionary pressure to have good teeth. In the animal world, animals with bad teeth wont be able to eat, and therefore would die. We humans have grown beyond that, so people with bad teeth are able to brush/floss regularly, and still breed!
 

Post a Comment