Saturday, August 06, 2005
This Day:

A cluster of at least three asteroids between 20 and 50 kilometres across colliding with Earth over 3.2 billion years ago caused a massive change in the structure and composition of the earth's surface, according to new research by Australian National University earth scientists.
According to Dr Andrew Glikson and Mr John Vickers from the Department of Earth and Marine Sciences at ANU, the impact of these asteroids triggered major earthquakes, faulting, volcanic eruption and deep-seated magmatic activity and interrupted the evolution of parts of the Earth's crust.

Impact! (Courtesy: Thinkquest Library)
The identification of impact ejecta — materials ejected by the hitting asteroid — is based on unique minerals and chemical and isotopic compositions indicative of extraterrestrial origin, including Iridium anomalies.
The impact ejecta from the Barberton region in the eastern Transvaal (of Australia) indicate the formation of impact craters several hundred kilometres in diameter in oceanic regions of the earth, analogous to the lunar maria basins (large dark impressions on the surface of the moon). The seismic effects of the impacts included vertical block movements, exposure of deep-seated granites and onset of continental conditions on parts of the earth surface:).

(Hide) (Show)

1 Comments:

At August 09, 2005 12:53 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Science is all about step-by-step deduction, pure and simple. That is why I like it so much, doesnt matter what branch of science it is.
 

Post a Comment

Friday, August 05, 2005
This Day:

The Hydrogen atom consists of a single Proton at its nucleus, and an Electron orbiting it. The closer the electron is to the nucleus, lesser the energy it has. The lowest energy state (according to Quantum Mechanics) that the electron can have, is called its ground state, when the electron is supposed to be closest to the nucleus.
However, according to Randy Mills and co-workers at BlackLight Power, a company based in Cranbury, New Jersey, there might be a still lower energy-state, which they have termed the hydrino state:-?.

Left: Shrunken Hydrino State, Right: Normal Ground State (Courtesy: Blacklight Power)
Mills argues that the hydrino state could be used as a new source of energy - a claim that has led to a predictably negative response from other researchers:). Termed it the Blacklight process, the claim is that the process allows the electron to move closer to the proton, to which it is attracted, below the prior-known ground state. According to them, this generates power as heat, light, and plasma (a hot, glowing, ionized gas) with the formation of strong hydrogen products that are the basis of a vast class of new chemical compounds with broad commercial applications.
Earlier this year, Andreas Rathke of the European Space Agency published a paper in which he argued that the theory for the hydrino state put forward by Mills was the result of a mathematical mistake. Now another theorist has joined the debate: Jan Naudts of the University of Antwerp in Belgium argues that the Klein-Gordon equation of relativistic quantum mechanics does indeed permit the existence of a low-energy hydrino state!
A video explaining the Blacklight process is described here. Only time will tell. I, for one, am quite skeptical. Another skeptical look is provided here.

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At August 12, 2005 8:11 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Hmm..nice...how deep inside the atom are they planning to go...??? Stop them..Stop them..right away...By the way...SRay, whats your profession? I am quite curious now. :)
 
At August 12, 2005 11:22 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Profession? :)).. :-?.... I am an adventurer, wanderer, seeker of knowledge....
 
At August 12, 2005 4:07 PM, Blogger abnegator said...
Oh..that may be your passion but not your profession :)
 
At August 12, 2005 5:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hmm... my profession :-? I am a graduate student :).
 
At November 13, 2005 6:52 AM, Blogger blogtrotter said...
Great experimental evidence for an effect in academic journals - theory rubbish, results good == energy source of future
 
At January 04, 2006 11:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Who are any of us to see another’s vision of self sustainability as a "hoax" based on our own distain and jealousy for their passion.

I for one am grateful that such individuals seek their own vision, while I am equally unhappy to see others so eager to nay say and loath what they cannot own.

I myself am somewhat jealous that I wasn't able to convey such a vision. If this works, it is not the end of anything; it is simply another technology that we will undoubtedly adapt to our own life……and move on to the next problem.

I am happy to see that this technology is homegrown (American). If it were not and does work, the US will be at a severe disadvantage. We should embrace this discovery and hope that it remains a US found technology.

As far as the "rules of quantum physics" are concerned, the rules are not known and I seriously do not believe we are breaking any "pre-defined" rules, as anyone who truly understands quantum physics knows "the rules are based on the observer".

Dig it or leave it.
 
At August 22, 2007 8:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
It is not enough for Mills to invent energy-saving devices for himself and his in-group. As an inventor, he has the responsibility of presenting his work in a way that most other researchers can hope to understand. The attempt of Mills and his followers to reject a large portion of known physics, and to avoid discussing any way to link hydrinos with it, is self-destructive.

If hydrinos fail to become a useful energy source because a means of translating between known physics and Mills's physics is not available, it will be more than just a disadvantage for America. It will show the world a great American inventor who is more concerned with his pet theory than with giving his own free country the tools to speak freely about it.

Like Mike Tocher said, quantum theory is very flexible. However, it is Mills himself, not his detractors, who is denouncing the entire flexible structure of quantum theory and putting forth his own rigid structure in its place.

That being said, using sloppy physics to refute sloppy physics does nothing but further reduce the clarity of a physical issue. The article at www.phact.org does not make proper use of the uncertainty principle. All observables are functional averages over a waveform. Since the uncertainty principle is a tautological property of waveforms, which applies to every waveform whether or not it can exist, it cannot be used to show that some waveforms are more sensible than others.

The significance of the uncertainty principle is that it limits the information that a waveform can retain when it is constrained by the forces necessary to measure it. As such, it can be used to argue whether the data collected from an experiment indicates the purported properties of the waveform it measured. However, it cannot be used to determine whether the waveform is theoretically possible.

I would challenge both Mills and his detractors to put the data from his experiments through the same statistical analysis that has been used to interpret particle observations for many years.

All the great physical discoveries have gained fame through repeated independent collection of statistical evidence. And people like me who truly aspire to think objectively are not swayed by Mike Tocher's emotional appeals.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, August 04, 2005
This Day:

Hubble is still going strong:). Gazing deep into the sky, it has located a school of galaxies located within a tiny region of space. They are all very different: some are large, some are small. Some are old, and some are new. Most of them have never been seen before, until now:).

Galactic Find (Courtesy: HubbleSite)
A handful of large fully formed galaxies are scattered throughout the image. These galaxies are easy to see because they are relatively close to us. Several of the galaxies are spirals with flat disks that are oriented edge-on or face-on to our line of sight, or somewhere in between. Elliptical galaxies and more exotic galaxies with bars or tidal tails are also visible.
Many galaxies that appear small in this image are simply farther away. These visibly smaller galaxies are so distant that their light has taken billions of years to reach us. We are seeing these galaxies, therefore, when they were much younger than the larger, nearby galaxies in the image. One red galaxy to the lower left of the bright central star is acting as a lens to a large galaxy directly behind it. Light from the farther galaxy is bent around the nearby galaxy's nucleus to form a distorted arc.
This image is a composite of multiple exposures of a single field taken by the Advanced Camera for Surveys. This image took nearly 40 hours to complete and is one of the longest exposures ever taken by Hubble:):).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At August 07, 2005 2:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
You're talking of gravitational lensing right?

PS : I visit your blog/site everyday, am just too lazy to leave comments. So keep up the good work dude.
 
At August 07, 2005 2:11 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Not really:). None of the galaxies in the picture look alike, so they are not pictures of the same galaxy appearing twice/thrice as happens with gravitational lensing. It is just a nice picture, thats all :).

Thanks for visiting!
 
At August 07, 2005 3:19 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I know:(. So much is uselessly spent.. I wish someone tried to come up with solutions to keep Hubble up there:(.
 
At August 09, 2005 12:59 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks for that link:). India and USA share so many common traits (multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, tolerant, democratic, free-market) that they are natural allies. One has to look beyond the cold-war issues, and give the whole thing a fresh start.
I also think it would be wrong for USA to have a relation with India, only as a counter-weight to China. It is fair neither to India, nor to India-China or USA-China relationships, each of which have their own complex dynamic. History has taught us that whenever we make alliances not on what is common between us, but who our enemies are, we are only creating problems for the future.
 
At August 12, 2005 8:05 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
There would be something else coming up guys..dont get to crazy about it..I will take your issues and sentiments into consideration..and I have started working on this project rightaway. :D :D :D
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, August 03, 2005
This Day:

What is information? According to the Webster dictionary, it is the knowledge obtained from investigation, study, or instruction. In our everyday world, when we gain information, that means we have learnt something new to add to our existing knowledge. It seems things are a bit murkier (as usual!) in the world governed by Quantum Mechanics:). Quantum Mechanics describes the world of the smallest, of the Protons, Neutrons and Electrons, and it is possible to have something called Negative Information in that world:)).

Electron Cloud around a Sugar Molecule (Courtesy: Actuality Systems)
So what is Negative Information? According to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, at the quantum level, we cannot accurately compute both the position and the velocity of a particle (say, an electron). When we try to accurately find the position, there will be a large error in (our knowledge of) the velocity, and vice-versa. That is how the sub-atomic world works, and there is no way around it. Thus, there is a fundamental limit on how much we can know about a particle, and therefore about any set of particles. Since we cannot pin-point the electrons (or any other particle), we can only estimate their probabilities of being at any place at any given time, and can visualize this probability as a electron cloud.
However, there are situations when one might be able to know more than they are supposed to:D. The Uncertainty Principle, that stops us from knowing too much, also allows us to know too much for a while, and then let us know too less:)). So, over time, the principle is satisfied, but for small durations of time, you might be able to know more than you are supposed to know. The principle cancels out this extra knowledge by providing misleading, or negative information. Funny thing is: since you do not know when the system is providing accurate or inaccurate information, you do not know if you are getting more, or less:D:D.
This discovery, that quantum knowledge can be negative was made by three researchers, Drs Michal Horodecki, Jonathan Oppenheim and Andreas Winter, of the Universities of Gdansk, Cambridge and Bristol. Their work was published in Nature in August 2005:):).

(Hide) (Show)

2 Comments:

At August 12, 2005 7:57 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
delta x * delta p >= h/2pi; right...where x is postion and p is momentum. somepeople right it as h cross/2 which becomes h/4pi..i used to get confused about it but then it didnt make much different to me atleast then...i left answers with expression values...why would i reach to the 4-5 decimal places for no marks..:D nice article..but too technical to be on a blog thats why u didnt get any comments, seems so atleast to me :D..keep it up. : thumbs up :
 
At August 12, 2005 11:31 AM, Blogger Sray said...
but too technical to be on a blog thats why u didnt get any comments

:):).. doesnt matter :).
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, August 02, 2005
This Day:

Robots have a big step at kicking us humans into the dustbin of history;);). They have learnt how to catch!! A robotic catcher, developed by scientists at the University of Tokyo, Japan, can comfortably grab a ball careering through the air at 300 kilometres per hour, or 83 metres per second, according to its creators, Akio Namiki and his colleagues:).

Robotic Hand (Courtesy: NewScientist)
he robot does not even need a catching mitt. It resembles a single metallic claw, with just three fingers instead of the human complement of five. An array of 32 by 48 individual photo detectors in its “palm”, tracks a ball's trajectory at high speed. And a series of specialised image processing circuits recognise this movement almost instantly.
An approaching ball triggers the robot's three fingers into action. Actuators embedded in each joint use a burst of high current to move through 180 degrees in less than one tenth of a second. This enables the machine to snatch the ball in the split second it takes to arrive.
A video of the robotic hand catching the ball can be seen here:):).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At August 05, 2005 7:25 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Just been reading about this.

Quite cool.

Like one guys said, it's more of an engineering novelty right now, with no immediate practical use.

But I'm sure if I think about it for a while, I'll come up with a suitable application for the thing...
 
At August 05, 2005 7:29 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Many good things start that way, without a priactical use... but soon find really cool applications.

Heyy, I am seeing u here after a long time! Welcome back :).
 
At August 05, 2005 11:05 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've been busy.

While there's no doubt that what these guys have done is pretty good, it's nothing new.

There's a laboratory at MIT where they have pair of robotic arms and a couple of cameras placed loosely where a head might be.

All this thing does is sit there and wait for something to be thrown at it.

So in many ways, the only thing unique about this recent device is the speed at which it can catch items, given that it's stationary...
 
At August 05, 2005 11:08 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
I guess Indian cricket team might find it very useful. They could attach it to their hands and then could stand in the slips so that no knicked ball goes by uncaught...see I found an application just now :D... japanese are really crazy..i dont know where will they take up technology too...:D
 
At August 05, 2005 5:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: I agree. But the speed is an important thing! The next step would be to put it on top of a moving hand, and who knows, perhaps we can have a tennis player :D:D.

Abnegator: sure they can :)).. but I am sure they will find a way to drop the ball then too :D.
 

Post a Comment

Monday, August 01, 2005
This Day:

Parion (also known as Parium) is an ancient city (3000 years old) in western Turkey. The city was named after the famed warrior Paris, son of King Priam of Troy (in Iliad, Homer's epic):):). There were a number of architectural structures, towers and four temples in the city. Recently, archaeologists unearthed a number of works of art including crowns of a prince or a king under that city, which were buried in four sarcophagi (stone coffins bearing sculpture and inscriptions).

Ancient Parion Coins (Courtesy: Snible)
Inside the coffins, there were two crowns of a prince or a king who was believed to have lived some 2000 years ago, two golden coins bearing figure of the sun god and several other pieces of jewelry. Also unearthed were 150 pieces of works of art during the excavations. All these findings reveal the importance of Parion in ancient times.
The findings will be exhibited in the Canakkale Museum of Archaeology. Also, the ancient city of Parion is expected to be opened to tourism like famous ancient city of Efes (Ephesus):):).

(Hide) (Show)

6 Comments:

At August 04, 2005 2:12 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Whoa..I am back...Nice for the Archaeologists world..they keep on digging ..keep on digging ..until they get something...I sometimes fear their homes might be having a lot many number of such holes.. or rather i must say wells..digging enough would actually make a well ..wont it ? :D
 
At August 04, 2005 7:18 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
;)
Where is someone do u know!?
Diggggerrrr:DNew job u have found?!:D
 
At August 04, 2005 7:19 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Tipiiiiiiiiiiiiliii toooeeeeee:D
 
At August 04, 2005 8:15 AM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL Abnegator :).

Lemna: I am currently digging a hole under my house :-$, to go you know where :-$ :D:D.
 
At August 05, 2005 5:35 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The coins are made of silver (black now as they have oxidized), or silver-plated. More info here.
 
At August 07, 2005 3:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I think they will. At most they might scratch a corner to get a sample, which will tell us how they smelted for silver, and how pure the silver was.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, July 31, 2005
This Day:

Once it was in the realm of science-fiction. Yes, DNA sequencing (and its associated field, called Bioinformatics) has come a long way:). The first attempt at sequencing begun in 1990, and it took nearly 14 years to complete. Now scientists are getting much better at it, and faster and more accurate genome deciphering techniques are on the horizon. A report published online by the journal Nature describes one such method that is 100 times faster than conventional ones:):).

Microscopic Image of human chromosomes (Courtesy: BBC)
The new technique has been developed by Jonathan M. Rothberg of 454 Life Sciences Corp. in Branford, Connecticut and his colleagues. The technique uses tiny fiber-optic vessels (55 microns x 50 microns) to detect and sequence hundreds of thousands of DNA molecules simultaneously. The results indicate that the setup can sequence 25 million base-pairs (each human chromosome is about 51 to 245 million base-pairs long, and we have 46 chromosomes) in a single four-hour run with greater than 99% accuracy:):).
A single such run of the system was able to sequence entire genome of the parasitic bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium (one of the organisms with the smallest genome), which includes 580,069 base-pairs!! And with an accuracy of 99.96%, that is just plain astounding:).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At August 02, 2005 1:29 PM, Blogger Saravana said...
Hmm better science, better medicines, better life.
 
At August 02, 2005 4:07 PM, Blogger Sray said...
You are right, Lunatic, that the classical techniques of comparing anatomical similarities is obsolete. Recently, there have been cases where accepted taxonomic structures have been rewritten after the genetic codes were compared.

When comparing DNA sequences, scientists look for similarities in regions that do not change much across generations or different members of the species. Such regions contain critical genes essential for the growth and survival of the organisms. Our genomes mutate (on average) at a constant rate, so from the number of differences between such portions of genomes between different species, we can determine how far back in time the two species diverged! Then we know the phylogeny of the organism :):).

Saravana: Very true :).
 
At August 03, 2005 5:10 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa, in a way. Interesting pieces of genomes from two different species can be compared to see how many base-pairs are different (among other things), and that gives an estimate of the "distance" between the two species.
 
At August 04, 2005 3:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks, Atheist, I misspoke there. But I am sure comparing errors in existing genes also helps; for example, recently it was discovered that cats have a flawed gene that renders them incapable of tasting sweet flavor.. so one can therefore see where their position in the animal tree would be.

Creationists wont believe even if there were a god and he/she were to come down and tell them that evolution did happen ;).
 
At August 05, 2005 6:30 AM, Blogger Sray said...
You should ask the logically-minded creationists (dunno if it is a oxymoron) to consider this for a moment. Suppose they had never read the Bible, or heard of creationism. Then, given all these evidences about evolution, would they be inclined to believe in it? If yes, then do they see any stronger evidence in the Bible that refutes it?

I wonder how they would answer. Then again, a logically-minded creationist might be rarer than the white elephant.
 

Post a Comment