Saturday, March 05, 2005
This Day:

Modern digital chips operate are two-state machines, working only with 0s and 1s. These states are normally electric currents/charge, where some value below a (pre-determined) threshold (say 3 Volts) would be a 0, and above would be a 1. Chips spend a lot of energy ensuring that a 0-state is indeed a 0-state (and not a 1-state with a large negative error in the voltage), and vice-versa. For handheld devices (PDAs, MP3 players) that run on batteries/solar-power, this is a problem, because a) efficient power management allows such devices to run for longer time, and b) smaller devices have problems dissipating the excess heat.

PCMOS based on the PBITS framework (Courtesy: Georgia-Tech
Dr. Krishna Palem of Georgia Tech has now produced a device that does not guarantee an exact 0 or a 1. Instead, the device makes sure that the probability that the bit is a 0 (or a 1) is at least p (0≤p≤1, where p=0: the bit is definitely not 0, p=1: the bit is definitely not 1).
This PBITs model is now backed by measurements of an actual probabilistic CMOS device which the researchers call PCMOS (Probabilistic Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor). Supported by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the research team estimates that 100-fold improvements are possible to the energy consumed and performance of complex applications such as neural networks, which are used for pattern recognition and other applications such as spoken alphabet recognition programs used on cell phones.
According to the vice-president of Research Operations (Dr. Ralph K. Cavin III) at Semiconductor Research Corporation, The most striking thing about the work is the idea that we can utilize a phenomena normally viewed as unwanted (noise on the chip) as a vehicle to address an important and limiting problem (reducing heat dissipation). There is something powerful and appealing about turning a problem into a feature!

(Hide) (Show)

8 Comments:

At March 06, 2005 2:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The advantage is in terms of power consumption. If you dont have to guarantee a definite 0 or a 1, the power requirements are much less, which means a) smaller/longer batteries for PDA etc. b) More computing power in less space. This means the handhelds (as well as other computers) will get much faster, and more energy-efficient, if they use this technique.
 
At March 07, 2005 2:30 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Nice,I'm really happy that I can find up-to-date articles here in brief.:)thanks
 
At March 07, 2005 7:37 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I'm not sure what the shelf life of this technology will be once quantum computing becomes more viable...
 
At March 07, 2005 8:12 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: Nice to know you enjoyed it :-).
Lucretia: Agreed. Also, a probabilistic computer is like a poor man's quantum computer.. instead of two state, you could in theory have a mixture, and therefore, solve problems parallely.
Wayne: Quantum computing has a long way to go! In the meantime, things are only going to get smaller (and I dont expect to see quantum computing in handhelds anytime soon!). So we need something that is more power efficient.
 
At March 07, 2005 8:51 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Clearly, quantum computing isn't around the corner, but I know that Israeli researchers have been working on 'wetware' computing for some years, which arrives at similar solution if not as massively powerful.

By harnessing living cells, the idea of binary calculations becomes a little quaint when there are so many other possible states available.

And, given that Japanese researchers have figured out how to extract chemical energy directly from the bloodstream, how long before motor dysfunctional disorders and such like become a thing of past?

This kind of technology really is the future...
 
At March 07, 2005 9:44 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Things are gonna change a lot during our lifetime.. as they say, you have seen nothing yet!
 
At March 07, 2005 1:16 PM, Blogger Sray said...
No, this is different. You are perhaps talking about the Intel Centrino processors? The chip outlined in this post is still in the research phase, and the first prototypes are being fabricated and tested.
 
At March 07, 2005 2:16 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Blogger is really slow.. the comment page took eons to load!

If you want a notebook, it might make sense to go directly to centrino. For desktops, if you wait a year or so, yo ushould be able to get the new 64 bit processors!
 

Post a Comment

Friday, March 04, 2005
This Day:

Scientists have discovered the smallest star (to date). Using the 8.2m Very Large Telescope (VLT) telescope at ESO Paranal Observatory, Chile, the star (named OGLE-TR-122b) which is only 16% larger than Jupiter, was identified during analysis of data gathered during the planet-hunting OGLE project. The star has a sun-like companion, OGLE-TR-122, which dims as the smaller star passes in front of it once a week. This allowed the scientists to measure the mass, radius, and other properties of this small star.

Smallest of them all (Courtesy: The Register)
The star weighs at 96 times Jupiter's mass, whereas a minimum of 75 times Jupiter is required for nuclear fusion to begin, and a star to form. This is the first time scientists have observed a star with a radius comparable to a planet. But it isn't the least massive. That honour goes to a star (AB Doradus A, 48 light years away, 50 million years old) just 93 times Jupiter's mass, announced early in 2005 by the University of Arizona. But, because that lightweight's transit of a companion object is not visible from Earth, its size is unknown.

(Hide) (Show)

3 Comments:

At March 05, 2005 1:27 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Questions, questions, questions!

What's the life cycle for such a micro star?

Plus, what happens when they exhaust all of their nuclear fuel? Do we still go through the red giant -> super nova stages?

I read recently that our sun is made from the debris of an earlier star. So our sun is at least a second generation star.

It's thought that first generation stars could never give rise to planets that bare life because the stars do not contain enough of the ninety-two elements...
 
At March 05, 2005 2:07 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"What's the life cycle for such a micro star?"

Micro-stars will proceed to the red-giant stage, just like sun would. After the red giant, the star would settle down into a white dwarf stage. That is the end of the road for stars weighing 1.4 times solar mass, or less.

Larger stars tend to burn out faster (these are normally the blue stars, with surface temperature of the order of 10,000K or more). These stars would explode in a supernova, and then if enough mass is left behind, settle down to a neutron star, or even a black hole.

Sun is a second generation star, (partly) created from the debris of a supernova. Heavier elements (heavier than iron, which has atomic number 26) cannot be created through fusion reactions, since it takes more energy to create such nuclei than to break them. Heavier-than-iron elements are created in the outer layers of the supernova, due to extreme shock waves generated by the explosion.

"It's thought that first generation stars could never give rise to planets that bear life"..

Possibly. But life has unusual ways of starting up.. so who knows!
 
At March 06, 2005 2:18 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Well, there are 10^11 galaxies, each with say 10^11 stars :-). Thats more stars in the universe than there are sand-grains on all the beaches.

Many of these galaxies are so far away (and therefore so faint) that it takes days of observation to detect one sometimes. Thats a lot of time, so new galaxies are few and far between.

Also, it is not enough to just 'see' a star. You have to be able to measure its brightness/aparrent motion (if you can)/composition (using the spectral graph), to make an accurate assessment of how far it is/what it is/when it was born. That takes time as well.

And of course, equipments are getting better too, so that has an effect as well.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, March 03, 2005
This Day:

According to Purdue University scientists, a newly discovered plant protein complex that apparently switches on plants' growth machinery, has opened a scientific toolbox to learn about both plant and animal development. Results are published in the February issue of the journal The Plant Cell.
The protein complex (ARP2/3) controls the production of actin filaments, which are necessary for cellular growth and movement. These filaments organize the inside of the cell and allow it to grow, and also determine where certain structures in a cell are positioned and how plants respond to gravity and light. Similar structures (myosin), exist in animal muscles.

Hair-like Trichomes on leaves (Courtesy: Purdue)
The research showed that a another protein called DISTORTED3 (DIS3) turns on ARP2/3, which in turn triggers formation of new, growing actin filaments(e.g. in trichomes, which are hair-like structures on leaves). Because some genes have survived through time as multicellular life evolved, they have been conserved in both plants and animals. So, some of the plant proteins that comprise the ARP2/3 and the WAVE complexes are interchangeable with proteins in animals, for example, DIS3 has two ends that are common in both plant and animal proteins!
Scientists are now studying these protein complexes to study biochemical reactions (in both plants and animals). This process eventually may allow researchers to design plants better able to protect themselves from insects and disease.

(Hide) (Show)

6 Comments:

At March 04, 2005 5:54 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It might certainly be possible. Remember that reptiles and amphibians are able to regrow body parts. We can also regenerate albeit at a more restricted level (healing wounds, growing new muscle fibres, etc.).

But one has to watch out for cancers, though!
 
At March 04, 2005 12:39 PM, Blogger Ostrich said...
Super site!!! Scientific thought in nice measured doses for Amateurs with interest! Excellent! A spoonful of science makes the medicine go down, in the most delightful way!

Incidentally, how does this combine or aid or challenge stem cell research?
 
At March 04, 2005 12:56 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks Ostrich :-). BTW: how did you come up with that nick? Your site suggests anything but!

Understanding the biochemical reactions that underlie all organisms is always a plus. Once we are able to decipher how a muscle for example, works, it should be possible to reverse/prevent muscle degenerating diseases (like Parkinsons, ALS).

Stem-cells are used since they can *become* any cell in the body, and thereby generate the necessary proteins/hormones (at least in some cases, when the goal is not to create a new organ, but to correct an hormonal/neuronal problem). If we can directly manufacture and inject the proteins, that would be an interesting alternative to using stem cells.
 
At March 04, 2005 12:59 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
It's recently been discovered that the Anaconda has the ability to increase the size and strength of its heart.

This is done prior to ingesting food -- which is a non-trivial task for most snakes since they swallow their prey in one.

The process is [obviously] reversible.

Also, there is a plant -- whose name I do not know -- that has hemoglobin just like animals.

So if you cut it, you will see blood...
 
At March 04, 2005 1:30 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Some other organisms (some worms similar to echinoderms) have haemoglobin.

Plant hemoglobins are called leg-hemoglobins, and they perform a similar function (plants breathe oxygen too.. just that they produce more than they breathe in).

All the following are organometallic or metalloprotein compounds, very similar in structure.

Chlorophyll (plants, has magnesium)
Haeomoglobin (animals, iron)
Hemocyanin (crustaceans/molluscs, blue)
Chromagen (Sea-squirts, vanadium)
Cyanocobalamine (Vitamin B-12, Cobalt)

Interesting how nature works!
 
At March 04, 2005 7:26 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
An interesting idea, but you'd probably still suffer from hardened arteries and other heart-related illnesses...
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, March 02, 2005
This Day:

A mysterious object is sending out powerful radio signals from near the center of our galaxy. As reported by NewScientist, the pulses are coming from a spot just to one side of the galactic centre. Each pulse lasts about 10 minutes, and they repeat regularly every 77 minutes. If the source is near the centre of the Milky Way, it would be one of the most powerful emitters in the galaxy. The shape and timing of the pulses rules out most known sources, such as radio pulsars.

Milky Way Galaxy (Courtesy: NASA)
According to the researchers (led by Scott Hyman of Sweet Briar College), who detected the object using the Very Large Array (VLA) radio telescope in New Mexico, the object could be a magnetar (a neutron star with a very powerful magnetic field). A pulse from another powerful magnetar collided our atmosphere in December.
The team is currently studying the phenomenon using the Green Bank radio telescope in West Virginia, and also plan to use the orbiting Chandra X-Ray telescope to see if the object is also spewing X-Rays.

I have to stop here... my friends are calling again from the center of the galaxy...

(Hide) (Show)

14 Comments:

At March 03, 2005 1:09 AM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL... but seriously, who knows, perhaps it is a beacon, released by some advanced civilization to monitor the growth of milky way's central black-hole.
 
At March 03, 2005 2:06 AM, Blogger Sray said...
They might be using the Arecibo to check on this new object. Arecibo is often used to 'spy' on emissions from the galactic center :-). They use the Arecibo L-band Feed Array (ALFA) which can pick up really faint objects (see my post on dark galaxies, where they use the ALFA to look at large areas of the sky). Also, Arecibo is a radio-telescope, and should be able to supplement what Chandra sees (in the x-ray range). Optical wont work, because of the huge dust clouds near the galactic center, which obscure our view.
 
At March 03, 2005 2:11 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Also, read this article that appeared an hour ago. It says:
he bursts coming from the new source, dubbed GCRT J1745-3009, each lasted about 10 minutes and repeated on a 77-minute cycle for nearly seven hours. In addition, the source is not stationary. "It [GCRT J1745-3009] has not been detected since 2002," Hyman notes, "nor is it present on earlier images."

Whatever it is, it is unique: the astronomers suggest it is either the first of a new type of object or an example of a known source acting in a novel way. Of interest to the scientists is the fact that no x-rays were detected along with the radio waves, because many astronomical sources emit both. In the future, the team plans to continue monitoring the Milky Way for further evidence of GCRT J1745-3009 using both radio and x-ray telescopes.
So there! Gotta be a beacon of some kind, wont you say?!
 
At March 03, 2005 2:33 AM, Blogger Sray said...
"the source is not stationary"

I think that is not really surprising. If the source is very close to the center, it has to orbit it at a very fast rate. The motion of the source relative to us should then be easily visible.

I would like to know the speed of the object, though. I am still looking for more details.. will let you know once I find anything :-).
 
At March 03, 2005 2:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Check this out.. not yet sure what all the columns mean... just keeping it here for the record.
 
At March 03, 2005 9:22 AM, Blogger Sray said...
MJD stands for Modified Julian Date. The Modified Julian Day was introduced by space scientists in the late 1950's. It is defined as MJD = JD - 2400000.5.

An MJD of 52000 corresponds to JD = 2452000.5, which corresponds to March 31, 2001. The plot represents light curve (intensity of the light vs. time), so there was a spike in the apparent brightness of the object around March 31, 2001.

The interesting thing in the plot is the oscillations towards the end of the graph (which corresponds to a period of 100 days before Feb 28, 2005). That shows there is something new afoot in that object.
 
At March 03, 2005 9:44 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
great news: We are not alone...
Nice picture
 
At March 03, 2005 1:05 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"amazing amount of stories about space discoveries and inventions this year."...

this year? It has only been two months! But I know what you mean :-D. Space is the last frontier, and discoveries are only going to get more frequent!
 
At March 04, 2005 1:00 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Isn't this thing thought to be a magnetar?

Which is a neutron star with massive amounts of electromagnetic energy...
 
At March 04, 2005 1:21 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"Isn't this thing thought to be a magnetar?"

Thats what I wrote!:
"the object could be a magnetar (a neutron star with a very powerful magnetic field)"

But magnetars emit strong x-rays, and little or no x-ray was detected here. Also, it seems the light curves do not match any other magnetars. perhaps a future chandra observation will clear the doubts.
 
At March 05, 2005 9:46 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I understand that by using magnetic energy, it has been proposed that it may well be possible to visualize the surface of a black hole, or what are technically called quantum singularities.

The pattern of magnetic energy is influenced by the surface properties of the black hole -- which is a star, only one one which is unimaginably dense.

Black holes are known not to emit X-ray themselves, but the swirling storm of matter around them gets so furiously hot and moves so quickly -- typically a 3rd the speed of light -- that X-ray emissions are observed.

It has also been proposed that black holes do in fact emit radiation, which has since been called Hawkins Radiation, after Professor Stephen Hawking, who first proposed the idea.

So over time, a black hole would ultimately 'bleed' away into nothingness. However, this process would take a very long time.

So, maybe what they're looking at is a fading, dyeing black hole?

I'm sure Sray will fill out / pick holes with that idea...
 
At March 05, 2005 10:56 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: Interesting idea. But the Hawking radiation is very very faint for large black holes. It takes eons for such a black hole to evaporate. According to quantum uncertainity principle, pairs of matter/anti-matter particles are always created and destroyed. If and when such a pair is created near the black hole surface (event horizon), the black hole might capture one of them, and then the other can escape, thus carrying a small amount of momentum (i.e. energy from E=mc^2, and thus the black hole slowly bleeds to nothingness.

The Hawking temperature of a 30 solar mass black hole is a tiny 2×10^(-9) Kelvin, and its Hawking luminosity a miserable 10^(-31) Watts. The black hole has to be really small to generate the amount of power seen with the object in this post... and then it would radiate so fast that it would vanish in a couple of years, and also follow a certain decay pattern. This object has been going steady for the last few years, and with no apparent pattern.
 
At March 05, 2005 11:07 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Here's where I just pluck an idea out of thin air, throw it at the wall of reason and hope that it sticks:

What if this was still a black hole, quite a small one -- as you've said -- but it's being fed dark matter?

Might we not see any radiation at all from the vortex of dark matter surrounding the black hole and then think the little devil was sat there all on its lonesome?
 
At March 05, 2005 11:28 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Suppose it is dark matter. The nature of dark matter is not yet well understood, but it is generally accepted to be of three kinds:
1. Inert matter, which are cold, and do not emit radiation and hence are invisible. Most extremely diffuse gas clouds (and brown dwarfs) fall in this category
2. Non-baryonic matter, like leptons etc.
3. Some new form of matter.

The first two kinds should get accelerated when drawn into the black hole, and should produce x-rays. It could be that some nearby star/mass is feeding this object, and so it is flaring up from time to time.

But if that is the case, it cannot be a evaporating black hole. If the radiation that is observed is mostly due to evaporation, it should blast out any matter stream that is coming from a disintegrating star nearby.

Now, it could be some new form of matter. That can only be said for certain once the chandra and other x-ray observatories produce their results on this object. Perhaps this form of matter does not produce x-rays while falling into the horizon.. only time will tell :-).
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, March 01, 2005
This Day:

Solar flares often lash out at outer space from the surface of the Sun, releasing huge amounts of matter and energy in the process. When in the direction of the Earth, such energy release often causes exotic displays of aororae at Earth's magnetic poles. During such flares, mysterious, tadpole like features are often seen "swimming" towards the surface of the Sun, against the tide of hot matter rising from the Sun. These features are huge (several time larger than the Earth) with dark heads (cooler than the average solar surface temperature), and wiggly tails, and have puzzled astrophysicists for several years, as they are so unlike any other phenomena observed on the Sun.

Solar corona (Courtesy: University Of Warwick)
Researchers Dr Valery Nakariakov and Dr Erwin Verwichte (from University Of Warwick) might have discovered the physics behind the process. By analyzing the observations obtained with NASA's Transition Region And Coronal Explorer (TRACE) mission, they propose that the wiggles of the tadpoles' tails are huge waves. The tadpoles are optical illusions, similar to a fast rotating car-wheel that often looks like rotating backwards. As the solar matter is constantly being thrown upwards, the starting point of this rising material moves deeper into the solar surface. To us, it looks as if material is falling back into the Sun!

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At March 02, 2005 1:59 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yup! I have also added another "On This Day" entry. Check it out.. it is from space.com :-).
 
At March 02, 2005 3:57 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I don't get that.

How do you get an optical illusion on film?

The car wheel thing is a perfect example of that. Yes, you get the illusion, but if you use a fast enough camera and slow the film down, the illusion is no more.

So these guys have only just started using high-quality video capture techniques?

Odd...
 
At March 02, 2005 8:40 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: Perhaps the car-thing was not a great example. I used only to show how waves can play tricks with our eyes.

Another example: Suppose you are sitting at a beach, watching the waves. When some wave-crests approach the beach, the regions between the crests (the troughs) might retreat, as their water is sucked into the neighboring (advancing) waves. If you are only looking at the troughs, you might have the idea that the wave is retreating, when instead it is actually expanding.

The retreating troughs represent the tadpoles in the Sun's case. Not much matter there, and their energy is sucked into the neighboring flare, and it looks as if this dark region is falling towards the Sun, when everything else is moving away.
 
At March 02, 2005 8:42 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia: I was talking about today's picture there (volcanos in Kamchatka, taken from space). This site also shows and describes one great space/earth picture a day.
 
At March 02, 2005 10:15 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I can still see it, so check your eyes/brain/computer, Lucretia!
 
At March 02, 2005 11:14 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Very nice...I like images of the sky. I like those about Nebulosas...
Anyway, about Blair, polls have shown Labour still have majority and don't forget, the second option is conservative Party, worse...
Liberals seems the best, but power has a negative effect in politicians...
Cheers & Namaste.
 
At March 02, 2005 4:58 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia, the Red Planet Ice is the image for March 02, whereas my post is for March 01! Has it already been March 02 in SA when you checked?

Gindy, you are in California, so you should have seen the volcano image! Hmm.. I am not sure why this is happening.. will check it out, and let me know where the link take you when u click it :-).

The Mars image is generated by combining different stereo images (thus allowing scientists to add the perspective). It is like the 3D movies, where two cameras take pictures simultaneously from slightly different positions, and that gives us the depth perspective.
 
At March 02, 2005 9:44 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy, I misunderstood one of your previous comment, where you agreed with Lucretia.. she was referrring yo a space.com image, and *not* to the image in this post.
 
At March 03, 2005 1:06 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yeah, it is 9.5 hours difference between NY and SA!
 

Post a Comment

Monday, February 28, 2005
This Day:

Do we have a sixth sense? During the tsunami disaster in the Indian ocean region, the ancient tribespeople inhabiting there were somehow able to sense danger, and move to higher grounds. Animals were also able to do the same, and in Sri Lankan forests, not one animal died due to the tsunami. There have been no solid proof one way or other, but now researchers from the Washington University in St. Louis have identified a brain region (Anterior Cingulate Cortex, or ACC) that clearly acts as an early warning system. This region a) monitors environmental cues, b) weighs possible consequences and c) helps us adjust our behavior to avoid dangerous situations.

ACC lights up (Courtesy: Social Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, UCLA)
The research is presented in the Feb. 18 issue of the journal Science. The ACC is a brain area located near the top of the frontal lobes and along the walls that divide the left and right hemispheres, and is involved in a lot of the executive control processes of the brain.
In the past, scientists detected activity in the ACC, when people have to weigh options and make a decision. This region is also active when a person recognizes he/she has made a mistake. Now scientists have found that ACC can recognize when we might make a mistake, and take appropriate action. So the ACC operates as an early warning system, and warns us when there might be a potential danger nearby. The most interesting part of the study: scientists found that the ACC warning often reaches us unconsciously; we might decide to avoid danger, without necessarily (or vaguely) being aware of it!
Scientists are now trying to create a model of the ACC using computers, and that should help in creating early warning systems that can learn from mistakes, and make predictions that are more like intuition, than a logical decision.

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At February 28, 2005 2:49 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Very interesting article....
 
At March 01, 2005 8:56 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia: I dont think so. Imagine you are walking down the road, and suddenly moved to the side unconsciously, and a huge truck passed by. Is that clairvoyance? Or is that your brain picked up very subtle clues about the approaching truck from a) faint sound, b) a gust of air, c) some vibration through ground? Animals are able to do this too. Problem with so-called psychics is: they would give their judgement often without any such subtle clues present.
 
At March 01, 2005 11:05 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Wow,so finally they have approached to the reason,but why we cann understand?maybe cuz we are obssessed with life afairs alot...'n if we concentrate we can do that too...
 
At March 01, 2005 11:35 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: Perhaps that is true. But jst as you cannot create something from nothing, you cannot (or I at least cant think how) detect an approaching danger without any shred of evidence (subtle or otherwise). You might process that evidence unconsciously, but it still should be there.
 
At March 01, 2005 12:17 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Thanks Sray for commenting things about my site. Well, I'm still struggling to build it and trying to write decent English since my first language is Portuguese...
Well, I really like your site: very well designed, nice colours, nice links, very clever display of wikipedia and BBC links on top and also good selection of articles.
I would like to do something similar in my but I'm still learning...
About the colours, I tried something different yesterday, a different colour scheme, maybe something crazy went on. Thanks for telling me, anyway.
About the interview, yes, it was very good. I always keep my eyes on channel 4 news, they have very good cover fo the political issues and it's usually deeper than BBC news.
Yesterday I watched this programme dispatches:torturetalking about what's going on in Guantanamo, US and British politics and Human Rights issues. Unfortunately the programme is not on display on line but it was very interesting specially now because the big debate that is going on in the country about the new anti-terrorist law proposed by the Labour(!)Government.
I'm going to write about it later.
See you,
Namaste!
 
At March 01, 2005 2:26 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I'm not sure how they're going to make this model work.

For example, there's going to be a definite need to understand the various types of sensory data being fed into this region.

As an example, there's still a lot of controversy about the existence -- or even the effects should such a thing exist -- of human pheromone.

Now, given the likelihood of most early-warning sensory data being almost imperceptible; like a sudden change in air pressure sensed by the ears, how do you build a model with any real degree of accuracy?
 
At March 01, 2005 2:34 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wow Wayne you are on a roll! Three comments within minutes... looks like you have finished your work :-).

" I'm not sure how they're going to make this model work."

I agree. I am quite skeptical myself.. but I think they are going to set up a neural-network/fuzzy-logic kind of a system, which will gather a lot of inputs, and then learn from experience which inputs affect a situation a) positively, b) negatively, c) none at all. This has applications in things like weather prediction.

Animals do not have complicated computers running in their heads, they just use the millions of years of genetic experience to set up some kind of a feedback mechanism in their brain, which tells them what to expect in nature. Perhaps instead of constructing rigid, mathematical models, such empirical setups can also give good results (within a margin of error, of course).
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, February 27, 2005
This Day:

The deep-sea tube worm, Lamellibrachia Luymesi, is among the longest-lived of all animals. It has a lifespan of 250 years, and now scientists from Penn State (Erik E. Cordes, Prof. Katriona Shea, Prof. Michael A. Arthur) and Rice (Rolf S. Arvidson) might have found out why. In a paper just published in the online journal PLoS Biology, the biologists say that the tubeworm releases its waste (sulfates) not up into the ocean but down into the ocean sediments. This stimulates the growth of sulfide-producing microbes, thus ensuring the tubeworm's long-term survival.

Close-up photo of tubeworms at 550 meters depth (Courtesy: Penn State)
The worm needs sulfides to survive, which is created by a consortium of bacteria and archaea that live in the cold deep-sea sediments surrounding the seep where the worm lives. The bacteria use energy from hydrocarbons to reduce sulfate to sulfide, which the tubeworm absorbs through tube-like extensions that are rooted into the sediments. The tubeworms also use the same extensions to return its waste (sulfates) into the sediment.
The scientists used a colony of 1000 tubeworms, and found that without this return of wastes back to the sediments, the average age of the tubeworms reduce to 39 years, with it, it goes up to 250 years as observed in nature. Thus, there exists a symbiotic relationship between the tubeworm and its surrounding microbes, that ensures a long life for the worms.
Other scientists are doing studies on the tubeworm's genetic development (here, and here), and the goal is to learn the secret of their long life, and perhaps use it to better our chances of a long life.

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At February 27, 2005 11:56 AM, Blogger Sray said...
In your case, art definitely imitates life!
 
At February 28, 2005 7:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Great site, I really enjoy it!
 
At February 28, 2005 8:12 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I dont think there is any obvious upper limit. Individual cells would die, but the organism can live on. For example, there are some trees which are 1000 years (or more) old. Certain fungi (here) are 4,500 years old!! As long as the body can regenerate in a perfect manner, there is no theoretical upper limit.
 
At February 28, 2005 8:16 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks Robert :-). Do come again!
 
At March 01, 2005 11:08 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Hmmmm,let me think whether I can do that too or not!!!!:D
 
At March 01, 2005 11:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yeah.. and when you are 250 years old, let me know. I will be around :-):-).
 
At March 01, 2005 2:20 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
It's believed that anaerobic (creatures that don't rely on the breathable air we rely on) were the first life forms to pop into existence.

More on that topic in an earlier post on this 'blog.

As for longevity, there's a theory that somewhere on Earth, very early bacterial life exists that may well have been among the first life forms to have formed on Earth.

The idea is that they are so primitive that the delicate genetic mechanics of death might not have evolved, thus making them immortal...
 
At March 01, 2005 2:29 PM, Blogger Sray said...
For a micro-organism, death might be an offshoot of the second law of thermodynamics. More primitive the organism, easier it might be to kill it off through normal wear and tear, since the mechanisms for repair might not have evolved.

Just because tubeworms (and other creatures of that kind) are so physically primitive, doesnt mean they are genetically primitive. They are also the product of 4 billion years of evolution, just as we are, and their genetic mechanisms might be as good as, or superior to those of us.
 
At March 01, 2005 4:14 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Complexity isn't always virtuous. Simplicity is often more successful...
 

Post a Comment