Saturday, July 09, 2005
This Day:

The word Nanotechnology refers to inventions and discoveries in the realm of the nanometer scale, usually 0.1 to 100 nm. NanoTech is poised to revolutionize our world. Just as the latter part of the 20th Century saw breakthroughs in electronics and computers, the first half of this century should see huge steps in nano-sciences.
With that in mind, working with Platinum nanowires 100 times thinner than a human hair - and using blood vessels as conduits to guide the wires - a team of U.S. and Japanese researchers has demonstrated a technique that may one day allow doctors to monitor individual brain cells and perhaps provide new treatments for neurological diseases such as Parkinson's:):).

Nanowires in the brain (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
In the research, published in the Journal of Nanoparticle Research, the scientists explain how such thin wires can be used to directly interface with the neurons in our brain. The nanowires are even thinner than the thinnest capillaries and blood vessels, which makes it possible to thread them through our vascular system. The logic is similar to using catheters to transport nutrients, but at a much smaller scale, and with much higher focus and impact.
The team (Neuroscientist Rudolfo Llinas and his colleagues) describes a proof-of-principle experiment in which they first guided platinum nanowires into the vascular system of tissue samples, and then successfully used the wires to detect the activity of individual neurons lying adjacent to the blood vessels:):).
The technique could revolutionize medicine as we know it. The nanowires could, in principle, direct nutrients and chemicals to the areas of the body that need it. It could be used to direct chemicals to tumors, or neurotransmitters to the regions of the brain that need it.
However, the biggest challenge is to thread the nanowire to the exact place required. There are thousands of such blood vessels in the brain, and to navigate through them to the exact spot is a daunting task indeed! But the researchers have a possible solution:). It is to replace the platinum nanowires with new conducting polymer nanowires. Not only do the polymers conduct electrical impulses, conductive, they change shape in response to electric fields, which would allow the researchers to steer the nanowires through the brain's circulatory system. Polymer nanowires have the added benefit of being 20 to 30 times smaller than the platinum ones used in the reported laboratory experiments. They also will be biodegradable, and therefore suitable for short-term brain implants:):).
Who knows... perhaps this same technology can one day be adapted to interface our brains with computers. We will all be cyborgs then:D.

(Hide) (Show)

1 Comments:

At July 10, 2005 5:39 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks :). I dont change very often, as not many people have told me they like it. Which ones did you like? I will try to add more music then:).
 

Post a Comment

Friday, July 08, 2005
This Day:

Zero is supposed to be an abstract concept. It was the last numeral to be created in most numerical systems, as it is not a counting number. The ancient peoples of the Indus Valley Civilization used fractions and negative numbers, but were unsure of the concept zero. Greeks had long philosophical discussions about the concept of zero! The first documented mention of zero is near 300 AD by Indian mathematicians.

Alex the Parrot (Courtesy: GEAE)
Now it seems a bird has grasped the zero, even though it took us humans such a long time to get our arms around it:). Alex, a 28-year-old African gray parrot who lives in a lab at Brandeis University in Massachusetts, has a brain the size of a walnut. But when confronted with no items on a tray where usually there are some, he says 'none':):).
Today, zero might not seem to be such an abstract concept to us. But kids are unable to grasp the concept till they are about the age of three to four! The result, published in the current issue of the Journal of Comparative Psychology, adds to growing evidence that birds and other animals are smarter than we thought:):). Perhaps we should look at the word 'bird-brain' with some respect from now on:D.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At July 09, 2005 8:08 AM, Blogger Santosh said...
hi
nice blog here..
can you tell me how have u listed the total blogs by per user..
mail me at san1378@yahoo.com
 
At July 09, 2005 9:08 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi thanks for your comment :). I just count the comments in the page using javascript, and display the results. You can open my javascript source file (as included in the html source) and take a look.
 
At July 09, 2005 9:48 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I couldnt agree more. We just need to stop this chauvinism about humans being the best. Admit it, an average animal is much more adapted to survive on its own, that an average human is. That capability to survive, requires intelligence.
 
At July 09, 2005 2:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Parrot,Parrot,yayyyyyyyy,i like them,but they r so arrogant:( but anyways,now u better respect me for my "Birdbrain"
 
At July 09, 2005 2:30 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Huh,that was not anon,that was me,see,now i prove the "Birdbrain part if it,dont i? ya ya,i know,u must be all laughing,go on,huh
 
At July 09, 2005 2:39 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hahaha... so perhaps I should call you bluebird from now on :D. And dont you insult birds by calling yourself 'birdbrain'.

Heehee.. try figuring that out ;);).
 
At July 09, 2005 2:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Already a friend calls me "BLUEMOM { a crude translation for Neelima:( and now u call me bluebird,huh,and what do u mean dont insult the birds,so u think i have not much brain as the birds do. "I HURTED,WALKING OFF,MEAN,MEAN,MEAN
 
At July 09, 2005 2:45 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Oh my god,i did it again:( again anon,but all u r blogs fault,donno why it is showing anon:(
 
At July 09, 2005 2:48 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Well Well Well!! You proved the point, didnt you, and boy you did it with some fireworks :)) =)).... haahaaaaa.... so my blog beat u... black and ahemm... blue! :D.
 
At July 09, 2005 2:52 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Again blue,i know,i know,I am caught badly here,But dude,u forgot something "EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY" errrrr,dont ask me if it was mine today.but first it started with birds and now to dogs,i better run away from here
 
At July 09, 2005 2:53 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa Yaa.. run away, with your tail tight between your legs :D:D:D... Blueeyyyyy =))=))... but remember, you will come again, and make the same mistake again...
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, July 07, 2005
This Day:

We are all familiar with the concept of a leap year. Every four years, an extra day is added to the year to keep the calendar year in sync with the seasonal year. If there were no leap years, then our seasons would be out of sync with our months within a generation! Similarly, a leap second is sometimes added to a year, so that our day is in sync with the Earth's rotation. When such a second is added, the last minute of the last day of the year is a second longer (61 seconds):D. Since 1970s, a total of 32 leap seconds have been added (the last being in 1998), and this year, the 33rd one will be added:).

Check your clocks on New Year's Eve! (Courtesy: University of Oklahoma)
Millions of years ago, the Earth had 10 hour long days! Due to tidal and wind forces, gravitational attraction of the moon and planets, and friction within the Earth's mantle and core, the Earth's rotation is slowing down. The extra second will be added to account for this slowdown. The International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service in Paris will sneak the extra time in on 31 December 2005.
The advent of atomic clocks in the 1950s allowed for extremely accurate measurement of periods of time. Starting at a particular point in 1958, an international array of these clocks has been counting out seconds, the length of which was defined at that point. This representation of time is the standard by which the public sets their watches. But people have been keeping an eye on changes in the length of seconds, as fractions of the Earth's daily rotation, using astronomical measurements.
Desktop computers will adjust to the added second by talking to other units on the Internet. Our clocks and watches perhaps need to be adjusted manually:):), so do not trust the advertizers when they say that your really accurate atomic clocks do not require any adjustments ;);).

(Hide) (Show)

2 Comments:

At July 08, 2005 2:12 PM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Hiyaa, about leap yrs, there is sth funny! Those who have born in that last day of the a leap year, they have their birthdays once in 4 yrs! How poor they could be!!!:))I hoped mine was like that too!
 
At July 08, 2005 3:46 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I wish too :). I missed my leap year birthday by only a few days!
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, July 06, 2005
This Day:

How cool will it be, if we could reconstruct an extinct animal from the fragments of its fossilized genome? Such a project is currently being unveiled at the Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, where U.S. and German scientists have launched a project to recreate the Neanderthal genome:).

Gibraltar Neanderthal Child (Courtesy: RDOS)
The project involves isolating genetic fragments from fossils of the prehistoric beings to map their complete DNA. Neanderthal was a species of genus Homo (Homo Neanderthalensis) that inhabited Europe and parts of western Asia from about 230,000 to 29,000 years ago. Adapted to cold, with short but robust builds and large nose, Neanderthals were finally wiped out when modern humans possibly moved in.
The genome project should be able to tell us how much genetically identical (and different) our closest cousins really were. The goal thus is not to recreate a Neanderthal (which might be unethical since they are so similar to us and might have been capable of conscious thought), but to help reveal the molecular evolution of human beings.
But the techniques developed during this work can certainly be adapted to recreate other extinct creatures. Jurassic Park, anyone:D:D?

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At July 06, 2005 9:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Fascinating. The photo blows my theory as to why Neandrathral died out. I thought maybe their jaw protruded so much, the roof of the mouth couldn't close completely, leaving a cleft mouth, and thus leaving them unable to develop complex speech patterns and compete with Cro-Magnum. From her face, that assumption is false! There's good evidence to presume a fair amount of sentience, they were conditioned to the cold, and, from what I have read, coexisted fairly peacefully with Cro-Magnum. Interesting!
So! Next question. Why did every single last species of dinosaur die off? There must have been hundreds if not thousands of species. True, many suffered from gigantism and couldn't adapt, but many weren't gigantic. Many were the size of a large dog, a small horse, a large hog or a cow. Many reptiles survived and survived quite well; crocodiles, snakes, lizards, amphibians. Just because a sudden deep freeze appeared, the tropics didn't disappear, they just shrunk. So why did every species of dinosaur disappear when many species of reptiles survived? Maybe DNA testing on some of these recent, well-preserved finds will provide a clue.
Mike in Prairie Village
 
At July 06, 2005 9:45 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Mike, thanks for visiting :). There is a lot about Neanderthals that we do not know. Their image suffered a lot during the early 20th Century, when they were depicted as brutes, incapable of complex thought. But recent and not-so-recent excavations have uncovered evidence of burials, primitive religion, compassion, and tool-making capabilities in these proto-humans:):).
About dinosaurs. They did not die out! However, they evolved into what we today know as birds. Birds share a lot of morphological features with the dinosaurs, and even though the large dinos died out, the smaller ones adapted and took to the sky:).
 
At July 07, 2005 5:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Burials: Some of the graves included flowers, bison bones and the red pigment ochre, which suggest a ritualized ceremony after death. This also suggests some degree of faith in what they are doing, which leads to some rudimentary religion/culture.

Compassion: Fossils have been found of Neanderthals who lived into old age even after being so critically wounded that they could not find their own food. This suggests that someone cared for them.

Signs of tool-making are many. Bones from these sites often have abrasions from stone tools, and even tools have been found. But they are much more primitive than those made by stone-age humans.
 
At July 07, 2005 8:45 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I think so. Corroborating evidence have been found in many cases, but some doubts still linger on... but only at the fringes and in the details.
 
At July 08, 2005 12:09 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Over the years, I have come to realize why archaeology, anthropology, and history are social sciences. Learned people, PhD's, people who have spent their whole lives studying something, have a set of assumptions and beliefs, and they unintentionally look for evidence to corroborate those assumptions. I have assumptions, we all have. Its only natural. However, recent finds in the last few years have been contradicting some of those long-held assumptions. One of them is that Neanderthal was some primitive, sub-human beast. I think even the term proto-human comes from that assumption.
Due to global warming, the glaciers in the crevasses of the Alps have been receding, and 2 or 3 frozen, well-preserved sites have been found. I assume this girl is a cast from one of those sites.
A couple of years ago, a grave site was found. In it a man who appeared to be of some importance, probably a clan chieftain, had been laid out with his best hides and furs and his best knives and spear points. His face had been painted with red ochre. Next to him was a small boy, probably his son. The boy also was in his best hides, his face painted, and he had a small knife. Fashioning tools from bone and flint and garments from hide and fur, painting (and cave paintings of Neanderthal have been found), and now, grave-site rituals says, at least to me, a high degree of sentience.
As far as the dinosaurs to birds, there was one class of dinosaur that a pterdactyl was part of that is thought to have evolved to birds. Recently, in southwestern China, a fossil of a pterdactyl-like creature was found that appeared to have quills of primitive feathers. However, its still very speculative at this point. And I don't think you'll find that raptors, herbivores, and the armor-plated creatures evolved into birds. Their bone structure was very dense to support their weight.
However, if pterdactyls evolved into warm-blooded birds, then how? I know nature and evolution have accomplished some amazing feats, but I have to ask, how did it evolve something from cold-blooded to warm? That involves creating the organs necessary to maintain a metabolism. I forget the organs that involves, to maintain a steady metabolism. But I find that amazing.
However, a well-preserved fossil was found in SW China, of a raptor, I think. It appeared to have the imprint of the lungs and possibly some of the heart. It caused some scientist to begin questioning if dinosaurs indeed were cold-blooded. This fossil had chambers in the heart that only warm-blooded animals are thought to have.

Mike
Prairie Village
 
At July 08, 2005 4:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Mike, thanks a lot for your nice comments :):).

I agree with you. Sciences like Physics are (mostly) observer-independent in nature. But social sciences can never be separated from the observer, so there is always a degree of uncertainty in any find. But the hope is that with more results, we approximate towards the 'truth'.

About the bird evolution. I am sure you have heard about the recent discovery of T-Rex soft tissue. Scientists have found that the tissue resembles those of the flightless birds, such as ostrich! So can we say that at least ostriches share some common ancestry with T-Rex? It could have evolved the same features independently, but it sounds unlikely.
 
At July 08, 2005 4:35 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Atheist: Thanks for the links. There are still a lot of open questions regarding bird evolution. When people talk about dinosaurs, they often only mean the T-Rex and such big reptiles. But there were numerous smaller dinosaurs, and they might have had a better chance in surviving the extinction, and then evolve into modern birds.
 
At December 18, 2005 8:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
I don't remember if anyone posted this about Home sapien neanderthalensis...but the poor guy got a bad name when one of the first fossils were found.

It was described as short, stubby, large cranial, but heavy brow ridge hominid. It was shorter than Crow-Magnums (early Homo sapient sapiens)..and a definite "inferior" hominid (by the early fossil finders of the past-not strict and academically trained archeologists with all the new technologies of today).

Later in history, when a the original neaders bones were re-examined...and the discipline knew more about osteology than they did when the initial neader was found, it was discovered that this particular Homo sapien neanderthalensis had suffered from severe arthritis..

Thus, his bone structure was totally out of place with modern hominids...and that is how the Neanderthals got a bad rap. This one should go to the Mythbusters...

As someone pointed out, neanders took care of their own..this first neander was buried with tools and flowers and that might indicate some type of ceremony and cosmology of his and his family groups life. I doubt they would just throw good tools away because someone died?

And, it is obvious that they didn't float their old and sick out on a block of ice to be consumed by the ocean. To carry or take care of an adult arthritic person who was unable to care for themselves, in an environment where hunting and gathering mean everything for survival shows very human traits of care giving and possibly compassion.

One last thought, and just IMHO...yes, parts of anthropology are a social science...but you must remember that there are 4 disciplines within the field...linguistics, archeology, physical anthropology (hominid and primates-behavior, osteology, and anything else dealing with the medical and physical aspects of various species) and finally cultural anthropology (study of human behavior).

In the past, the bad rap went to the cultural anthropologist as a social science..but that has changed immensely..just as modern medicine (which is also an art ) deals in double blind studies for new drugs, the cultural aspect of anthropology integrated the same discipline as all the other sciences. Null hypothesis, test groups, double blind, et al. No longer is the field the anthropology of Margaret Mead (bad example since her work stunk!) but if you are worth your grain of salt in the field, you have to provide the discipline, stats, et al before you publish.

Because of advancements in modern technology, archeology and physical anthropology have long been held to a higher standard..

And, linguistics is an science in itself to show whether certain cultures or peoples are related to each other through their language...to possibly show movement of people and integration of societies and/or alignments. Just a tad bit different from a general Linguistics class in college..as far as goals..but the same discipline and skills which are quantifiable.

Is anthropology a true hard science? It means the "Study of man"...we are just as much a part of nature as the air we breathe, or the study of oxygen. We just have more variables than say chemistry (as we know it) and much more complex variables than chemistry as we know chemistry today (which might change tomorrow..you just never know)...

Our complex social variables (which change from one culture to the next-from one neighborhood to the next) make us very unique and it is this uniqueness that the discipline is trying to quantify...using scientific discipline, I would say that anthropology is still in its infancy...and isn't that grand?

So much garbage work was done in the 19th and early part of the 20th century....unfortunately too, many of the cultures studied are long gone now with the onset of modern communications...but maybe there is a chance to capture what was in the past by looking at the present..one of the key aspects of the field.
 
At January 27, 2009 8:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Wow!!!!!!! I was just looking for a picture of Frozen Fossils for my 7 grade science homework 2 print off the compu8ter when I happend upon this. Interesting possibilities!!!! Jennica:)
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, July 05, 2005
This Day:

When did the first human being land in the Americas? For a long time, conventional wisdom suggested that the first humans entered North America through a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska (over the current Bering Strait) about 12-15,000 years ago during the last Ice Age, when the sea levels dropped. But there are competing theories, which suggest that humans entered the Americas by boat across the Pacific, or by walking along the Greenland coast.

Left: Closeup, Right: Walk in the park! (Courtesy: Nature)
Now a new evidence might push the date of this first arrival, further back in time. Researchers think they may have found footprints in southern Mexico that mark the oldest evidence for the presence of humans in the Americas. The impressions are preserved in volcanic ash outside the city of Puebla, and have been dated at 40,000 years ago!! This, if conclusively proved, would lend credence to the theory that humans crossed into the New World much earlier than previously thought.
Though they do look like footprints, researchers need to make sure that they are not some quirky creations of Mother Nature. But it does look like the area is peppered with more than 200 impressions that seem to be footprints from several people, including children, along with birds, cats, dogs and species with cloven feet:):). According to geoarchaeologist Silvia Gonzalez of Liverpool John Moores University, UK, these people might have been fleeing an eruption from the nearby Cerro Toluquilla volcano. It is the same volcanic ash that also helped preserve the prints for the last thousands of years, along with biological material such as shells which were used to date the ash strata:):).

(Hide) (Show)

1 Comments:

At December 18, 2005 7:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
This is an interesting story...and the figure of 40,000 years is even more interesting. I am not going to dispute the carbon dating of a footprint, unless it has been preserved under a rock, with extreme heat since this would affect the dating.

However, I would like to relay a story about another 40,000 dating of a fossil found on the West Coast of California...maybe some of you know about this? Del Mar man, carbon dated at 40,000 years ago was thought, at one time, to be the oldest fossil found in North America despite all the evidence against such an date (ie: Bering Straigt migrations and the 3 waves of people migrating and all the other theories)...

The real truth to Del Mar Man and his 40,000 year old date was that the bones were held in storage at a museum, near the heating system for many years before the dating was done...which modified any radio carbon dating.

Now that is what I call science! :)
 

Post a Comment

Monday, July 04, 2005
This Day:

Update: Videos (68.6KB, 108KB, Courtesy: NASA-DeepImpact)
Deep Impact is a NASA space probe designed to study the composition of the interior of the nucleus of the comet named Tempel-1. Tempel-1 is a periodic comet discovered in 1867 by Ernst Wilhelm Leberecht Tempel, an astronomer working in Marseille, France. The probe was launched on January 12, 2005. After its initial analyses of the comet, the probe separated into two parts (Impactor and Flyby).

Bada Boom! (Courtesy: NASA)
Now scientists have successfully crashed the Impactor into the comet:). The goal is to expose the interior of the comet, and thus gather data (using the Flyby) that should tell us a lot about the inner workings of the comet, and also shed light on the formation of our Solar System.
The Impactor is the size of a washing machine, whereas the comet is of the size of Manhattan (14 km long). The collision happened some 83 million miles from Earth:):).
The show is observed by all the major telescopes! It's not just Deep Impact that observed the mission. Every space and ground-based telescope large enough to do the job were watching: Hubble, Chandra, Spitzer, Galex and SWAS space telescopes were all recording the event:). The Rosetta spacecraft, a European probe on its way to another comet (67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko), also observed and recorded the show:)).
Scientists expect a wealth of data from all these observations. Not only will this help us in our understanding of comets, but it should also tell us more about the origins of our Sun, planets, and ultimately, us:).

(Hide) (Show)

8 Comments:

At July 04, 2005 11:26 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hii Luke :).. hmm.. what if 2004-MN4 is whacked and pushed out of the way a wee little bit... how will it change your plans;)?!
 
At July 05, 2005 8:02 AM, Blogger Sray said...
>:D<
 
At July 05, 2005 11:17 AM, Blogger Sray said...
This one is so funny :).. I cannot help but feel sorry for this poor lady... just imagine.. so many horoscopes to change and update.. it will keep her busy for the rest of her life :)).
 
At July 05, 2005 5:36 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: I did watch it :D:D. I have added an update to my post, which should take you to the explosion videos. Enjoy :).
 
At July 05, 2005 8:12 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The first link (again posted here) should work! Are you having problems seeing it?
 
At July 05, 2005 8:46 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Luke: I was wondering about that too :). But the figure is suspiciously very close to the actual mission cost of $330 million :).
 
At July 06, 2005 6:44 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Funny thing is: shouldnt she already know if her legal steps will be fruitful or not? ;).
 
At July 08, 2005 3:48 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Ditto that :):). Now I am keeping my fingers crossed for the next shuttle launch :-SS....
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, July 03, 2005
This Day:

The mathematical symbol Pi represents the universal constant 3.1415926535... which is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. Pi is a transcendental number, that is, it cannot be obtained as the solution of any polynomial equation with rational coefficients. This also means that there are infinite digits in Pi, with no apparent pattern:). One of the most beautiful numbers in mathematics, Pi has always fascinated mathematicians and laypeople of all ages. Currently, Pi haw been calculated to 1.24 trillion decimal places with the aid of a supercomputer:D:D.
Now a Japanese mental health counsellor has broken the world record for reciting pi from memory. Akira Haraguchi, 59, managed to recite the number's first 83,431 decimal places, almost doubling the previous record held by another Japanese:)).

Pi (Courtesy: BBC)
Mr Haraguchi, from Chiba, east of Tokyo, took several hours reciting the numbers, finishing in the early hours of Saturday. He hopes to be listed in the Guinness Book of World Records to replace his fellow countryman Hiroyuki Goto, who managed to recite 42,195 numbers as a 21-year-old student in 1995. Mr Haraguchi's effort took eight hours and 40 minutes, during which nothing passed his lips except water and several bite-size rice balls:):).

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At July 03, 2005 1:19 PM, Blogger MazBrost said...
Did you know there's a Flanders and Swann song about Pi? It's set to the tune of 'American Pie' and is rather good, if you're into that kind of thing.
 
At July 03, 2005 10:35 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Nicole and Graeme, thanks for visiting! I have heard the song :). Interested readers can look them up here. They also have a song on thermodynamics:)). Here is an mp3 recording of that :).
 
At July 03, 2005 10:38 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Pi,huh, how i used to hate mahs and related terms:)
 
At July 03, 2005 10:41 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Oye... dont you need (at least some) Math in your line of work?! :D:D.. Mathematics is what makes the world work:).
 
At July 04, 2005 1:16 PM, Blogger Onkroes said...
I'm amazed nobody else has asked this about the reciting of Pi from memory.... but, why?

I mean, Yes, it's fascinating, Yes, it's remarkable, Yes, an entry in the Guiness Book of Records is an impressive thing to hold, but... Why?

Also, about the guy who used to hold the record - what's he doing now, did it change his life?
 
At July 04, 2005 1:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sometimes, there is no reason... people try things because they are there for trying :):)... and I am sure it changed his life. It perhaps gave him confidence/fame, and who knows what else... some gains are so.. umm.. transcendental ;).
 
At July 05, 2005 11:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Reciting something from rote is not what I would call 'intelligent'... intelligence has more to do with creativity. I am sure he has found some creative way to remember all the digits, and that is where his intelligence perhaps comes in!
 

Post a Comment