Saturday, July 30, 2005
This Day:

Dinosaurs were reptiles that dominated the Earth during the Mesozoic Era (250 to 65 mya, or million years ago). The initial dinosaurs were small (less than a meter to few meters in size) during the Triassic period (upto 202 mya), but they grew much larger during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, when the fearsome T. Rex roamed the Earth.

Massospondylus carinatus (Embryo and Adult) (Courtesy: Sciam)

Scientists have discovered the oldest fossilized dinosaur embryos yet, which reveal tantalizing clues about dinosaur evolution. The embryos indicate that some of the prehistoric creatures started out on four legs before growing into bipedal behemoths. They also support the notion that newly hatched dinos did not fend for themselves and instead relied on their parents for nourishment:):).
Robert Reisz of the University of Toronto at Mississauga and his colleagues studied five fossilized embryos inside dinosaur eggs recovered from Golden Gate Highlands National Park in South Africa. The eggs are about 190 million years old, which was the beginning of the Jurassic period, and illustrate the development of Massospondylus, a creature that grew to five meters in length.
Scientists were able to compare the fossils of fully grown Massospondylus with the embryos, and chart the growth of the animal. They suggest that Massospondylus's horizontal neck, heavy head and immature limb proportions would have led to it walking on all fours shortly after hatching. As it matured, its neck grew faster compared with its head and forelimbs, resulting in a body type more suited to bipedal locomotion:):).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At July 31, 2005 8:36 PM, Blogger Crush said...
By any chance from kgp, chem dept??
 
At July 31, 2005 8:38 PM, Blogger Sray said...
KGP, yes. Chem, no :).
Thanks for visiting!
 
At August 01, 2005 12:03 PM, Blogger Sray said...
They were born with four legs. But the fore-legs are have a stunted growth, where they would grow into small hand-like things u see on a T Rex. The hind legs would grow larger and support the whole weight :).
 
At August 01, 2005 5:43 PM, Blogger Crush said...
i mean chemical engg?
 
At August 01, 2005 5:49 PM, Blogger Sray said...
That was NOT a trick answer :). As I said, I did not do Chemical Engineering at KGP, but I did do my B.Tech there.
 

Post a Comment

Friday, July 29, 2005
This Day:

Nano-Technology deals with the materials at size of a nanometer (10-9 meter) and smaller. NanoTech, which allows the creation of devices a 1000-fold smaller than those possible today, is sure to transform the world within the next few decades:).
Physicists at the University of Pennsylvania have overcome a major hurdle in the race to create nanotube-based Electronics. The researchers (Alan Johnson and colleagues) have used Carbon NanoTubes to create functional electronic circuits.

NanoTube Substrate (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
NanoTubes are so small, that the conventional procedure of etching the electronic components onto the substrate does not work anymore. The new method creates circuits by dipping semiconductor chips into liquid suspensions of carbon nanotubes, rather than growing the nanotubes directly on the circuit:):). The chips are pre-treated with a glue, on which the nanotubes stick when the chips are dipped into the suspension. The excess glue is then washed away using some solvent, and only the nanotube circuits remain!
The resulting circuits take advantage of unique electrical properties of nanotubes and can be produced in bulk. Since the researchers can create nanotubes via processes separate from the chips, this process allows for a better control of the quality and diameter.
Bulk creation and quality control are two essential ingredients that should lead to a wider application of this research to manufacturing of large-scale nano-electronic devices in the near future:). Such devices, for example, promise computers on a thumbnail running at 1000s of GHz speeds. The possibilities are infinite!

(Hide) (Show)

3 Comments:

At August 01, 2005 1:36 PM, Blogger Sray said...
:):)... I am sure in another decade or so, we shall have the first nano-computers. And then in another decade or so, they will invade our brains... and the cyborgs shall inherit the Earth.
 
At August 05, 2005 7:28 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've been reading some stuff recently where they're developing bacteria that ingest the stuff they need to build certain components and then .. well, excrete the components as they move along...
 
At August 05, 2005 7:30 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hmmm.. interesting! But I wonder how they are going to control the process, and maintain the thickness of the deposited layers etc...
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, July 28, 2005
This Day:

Since childhood, it has been drilled into our heads that there are nine planets in the Solar System. However, there is nothing magical about the number 9, and it has always been assumed that there might be more planets lurking out there. Now, 75 years after Clyde Tombaugh discovered the ninth planet Pluto, a tenth one has been found:):). Observed through the Samuel Oschin Telescope at Palomar Observatory near San Diego, California, even though it is a typical member of the Kuiper Belt, it is possibly larger than Sedna (largest object beyond Neptune other than Pluto), has a moon, and thus is a planet in its own right.

Tenth Planet (Courtesy: CalTech)
Tentatively named as 2003 EL61, the planet is about 97 times farther from the Sun than the Earth. It was first observed on October 31, 2003 and again observed in January of this year. In the last seven months, scientists have gathered enough data to make sure the size and orbit of the object, which conclusively pins it down as the tenth planet of the Solar System.
The size of the planet is limited by observations using NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope, which has already proved its mettle in studying the heat of dim, faint, faraway objects such as the Kuiper-belt bodies. Because Spitzer is unable to detect the new planet, the overall diameter of the planet has to be less than 2,000 miles. A name for the new planet has been proposed by the discoverers (Mike Brown, Chad Trujillo, and David Rabinowitz) to the International Astronomical Union, and they are awaiting the decision of this body before announcing the name:):).

(Hide) (Show)

17 Comments:

At July 30, 2005 5:04 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Oh...really? amazing..now all the textbooks would need to change their content related to this...thanks for the info if its authentic.
 
At July 30, 2005 7:28 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa :). We shall see!
 
At July 30, 2005 8:55 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Wohhh:)It is greattttt,Have it be there from the beginnin' or they go to be added later more planets too?!
 
At July 30, 2005 1:40 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: The planet has recently been discovered, and more analyses are needed to find out its exact mass and size, I think :). I am sure there are more such planets/planetoids out there :).
 
At July 30, 2005 1:41 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: There is a debate that is still on. Finally the question boils down to this: what is a planet? Perhaps at the first approximation, we can say it must be in a stable orbit, have a spherical/large-enough body, and this object as far as I know fits that model.
 
At July 31, 2005 6:08 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
I'm delighted but I have to say I didn't like the name : Xena.
 
At July 31, 2005 9:23 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hmmm I dont like it either. But it seems the astronomers wanted to name it on the warrior princess.

Was there a actual mythological Xena? All the other planets are named after Roman gods, it is a shame to see that pattern not being followed.
 
At August 01, 2005 12:04 PM, Blogger Sray said...
We all enjoy a good, lively debate, dont we? :):)
 
At August 01, 2005 4:54 PM, Blogger Sray said...
And oh by the way, think the amount of trouble this would cause to the astrolgers :D:D.. I wish I could see that Russian astrologer's face now, who threatened to sue NASA for crashing on the comet.... :))...
 
At August 02, 2005 6:30 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
actually , if you try to find out such bodies in the space..i am sure we are gonna end up with many more planets and that is quite not so settling. I would rather vote that people name them differently, not planets but something else. Keep the count of planets to 9 only and then let these newly-founded ones as sub-planets or Xenotics or anything else...What do u say, SRay?
 
At August 02, 2005 7:22 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yes... there is such a term. They are called planetoids, and there is a considerable debate on whether Pluto is a planet or a planetoid. But the question remains: what is the dividing line between a planet and a planetoid?
 
At August 02, 2005 8:23 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Oh..cool then..planetoids..what is the dividing line between a planet and a planetoid? TIME...as it is in case of Classical Physics and Modern Physics...TIME..isnt that a sufficient dividing line.. I would not disagree.
 
At August 02, 2005 9:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
What do you mean by TIME? Time the planet/planetoid has been in existence?! Or time since it has been discovered? One has to determine a purely objective (observer-free) criterion for determining whether a object is a planet or planetoid. It can be its size, mass, shape, shape of orbit, distance, or a combination of above.
 
At August 02, 2005 9:26 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Nothing could be observer-free..Einstein theory of relativity could be generalized in life and other sectors of our findings..dont u agree?by the way..by time I meant discovery time..now since we are sure that there are no such things called planets being sun and pluto except for the already known one so I guess lets close the planets sections..and come up with new terminologies about the new findings..Dont you agree that these things are just there to keep our knowledge organized? and build up reasonable hypothesis based on our current findings? I mean what difference is a planetoid or a planet gonna make to our existing theories and forumulations? Arent they just nomenclatures?
 
At August 02, 2005 9:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Of course, if you want to go down the path of QM and so on, nothing can be observer-free. But when we are talking about planets and planetoids, we are still (mostly) in the realm of classical physics :).

True that the words are just classifications, and I personally am fine with grey areas between two groups of objects. That is only natural :). The goal is not only to classify, but also better understand the processes that create planets, and those that create planetoids, and that is what is driving all this questions.

Personally, I am of the opinion that if a object has been created in the primordial dust cloud around the Sun and is the only object in that particular orbit, it is a planet. If not, it is most likely to be a planetoid (formed out of a dust cloud where a single planet could not form).
 
At August 02, 2005 9:46 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Ok..now I am tired :)...I wont argue with u any longer..ok..i must also admit ..you have convinced me to some extent but I had further questions..and explanations which I would not raise coz I am just tired...Had a very boring day in office...would be leaving for home now..Have a nice time..Nice blogs I admit..Nice posts..keep us informed... Cheers..
 
At August 02, 2005 9:47 AM, Blogger Sray said...
:)).. and I have just come to my work, so am fully of energy :D:D.. so it is an unfair advantage for me :):). See u later, and keep peppering with comments :).
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, July 27, 2005
This Day:

Evolution is normally a painstakingly slow process, by which organisms adapt to their surroundings through a slow but steady tinkering in their genes. As generations pass, the new traits are passed on to descendants, and only those that adapt the best, survive.
However, there are scenarios when evolution happens in a so-called 'blink of an eye'. Scientists have recently discovered that a new species of insect might have been created as a result of cross-species mating:). The process, called hybridisation, is common among plants (and indeed has been used to artificially create many interesting fruits). But this is the first time an animal species has evolved in nature, in this way.

Blueberry Maggot (Courtesy: USDA)
The probable new species belongs to a group of flies known as fruit maggots – highly specialised fruit parasites in which each species infests its own particular plant species. Bruce McPheron and his colleagues at Pennsylvania State University found that a particular species, called the Honeysuckle maggots, looked like the result of hybridisation between two fruit maggot pests of native species, the Blueberry maggot and the Snowberry maggot:)). The honeysuckle maggots, it seems, contain a blend of genes found only in the blueberry and snowberry maggots.
The first hybrid generation of Snowberry and Blueberry offsprings would have exactly half the genes of each kind. The discovered Honeysuckle maggots have a wide variety of gene ratios, suggesting that they have been inter-breeding for at least a hundred generations or so!
If such hybridisations can lead to totally new insect morphology and behavior, this would mean a much faster evolution in insects than previously suspected. We therefore need to think if insects in the past have also indulged in such practices, and if yes, what modifications and re-evaluation it would bring to the currently accepted hierarchical classification of insects in the Animal Kingdom.

(Hide) (Show)

1 Comments:

At July 29, 2005 1:08 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The bees were of the same genus (like lion and tiger are in the same genus). The maggots were much farther removed, and in different genus. Hence the surprising find.
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, July 26, 2005
This Day:

One of the biggest mysteries lies right beneath our feet. We have uncovered secrets of alien planets and galaxies, yet the secrets locked inside our own Earth is largely unknown. I am referring to the composition of the planet Earth. Part of the problem is that there is no direct way to sample the interior: so one has to resort to indirect means, such as seismology or mining. Until now:):).
Scientists have for the first time detected tiny particles called geoneutrinos coming from deep within the Earth. Neutrinos are nearly massless particles that are emitted as by-products of nuclear reactions, such as fusion reactions at the solar core, or radioactive decaying of metals such as Uranium and Thorium.

Inside the KamLAND Detector (Courtesy: PhysicsWeb)
The decay of radioactive metals inside Earth result in a stream of neutrinos, called geoneutrinos. For the first time ever, these particles were detected by a Japanese apparatus called KamLAND:):).
The detector used in the new study is buried under a mountain, to shield it from other neutrinos that arrive from space. It consists of 2,000 specialized light sensors inside a 59-foot (18-meter) balloon filled with, in lay terms, baby oil, benzene and a fluorescent stuff. When a geoneutrino interacts with the cocktail, it emits little flash of light. Over the past two years, the setup spotted about one of the elusive geoneutrinos a month. Each geoneutrino carries a signature of its chemical origin.
By building larger detectors, more such neutrinos might be detected. That will give us a peek into the interior workings of the Earth, by allowing us to locate the layers where the decays are taking place, and whether this layer is stationary/moving, its temperature, age and so on:). It will not happen overnight, but within a few decades, this new technique might just revolutionize our understanding of our planet Earth:).

(Hide) (Show)

3 Comments:

At July 28, 2005 4:49 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Nice one..Interesting and revealing..
 
At July 28, 2005 6:13 AM, Blogger trejrco said...
Indeed, good find! /TJ
 
At July 28, 2005 1:26 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks abnegator and TJ :).

Luna: I thought this photo of the detector was more appropriate.. the crust photo can be found in any high-school book :).
 

Post a Comment

Monday, July 25, 2005
This Day:

Move over Teraflops (1,000,000,000,000 flops), Petaflops is here:D:D. In the computer world, the word flops refers to FLoating point Operations Per Second, which is used as a measure of a computer's performance, especially in fields of scientific calculations that make heavy use of floating point calculations. Currently, United States has the fastest supercomputer (IBM's Blue Gene/L), that runs at 136.8 teraflops. However, soon Japan might have the fastest one! According to the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry of Japan, the planned supercomputer will operate at a maximum speed of 10 petaflops (10,000 teraflops!!).

Blue Gene/L Supercomputer (Courtesy: ITNews)
The total amount for the project is likely to reach $716 million to $895 million by the time the project is completed in 2010, if all goes as planned.
Such high-speed computers are necessary for simulating experiments that are difficult to conduct or take too much time in real life. Researchers hope to use the computer to develop new drugs, to simulate the formation of galaxies and to predict the paths of typhoons and intense rainfall.
The Japanese supercomputer held the title of world's fastest until last September but as of June it had fallen to fourth place. USA is also planning a petaflop computer by 2010:):).

(Hide) (Show)

6 Comments:

At July 27, 2005 5:26 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Whatever we do..there will always be many things that we cannot.and however much we try to control things in this world..they will only go farther out of reach.

These japanese..i dont know where they are gonna stop...they simple puzzle the rest of the world with their little somethings..:)
 
At July 27, 2005 6:31 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Abnegator: There will always be things that are a little beyond our grasp. That is part of life, and that is part of what makes life exciting :).

Lunatic: Thanks:). India/USA means: I am from India, and am currently living in USA:).
 
At July 27, 2005 2:51 PM, Blogger Tabula_Rasa said...
Quite an informative post
 
At July 27, 2005 3:00 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Atheist: LOL :)... does Tera-Flops have anything to do with the Earth (Terra) then? ;)...

Nomadic: Thanks for visiting :)... do visit again!
 
At August 02, 2005 12:30 PM, Blogger Saravana said...
Will I be able to play half-life in this computer :P
 
At August 02, 2005 12:31 PM, Blogger Saravana said...
I know it will not be long before the Japanese will put this computer in a game console.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, July 24, 2005
This Day:

According to the theory of Evolution, the traits of living organisms change over generations to adapt to their surroundings. Members of the same species, living under different circumstances, evolve in different ways. Over time, the species splits into two (or more) branches. This process is known as Speciation.
For this speciation to occur, the branches must refrain from interbreeding. The most obvious way this can happen is through Geographical Isolation (the branches are separated by a river, mountain, etc.), but it can also happen even when the branches are living side-by-side! Why it could be so was a mystery, until now:).

Agrodiaetus iphigenia nonacriensis (Courtesy: Sommerfugle)
Even when the branches are living together, they might choose not to interbreed, a process termed Reproductive Isolation. Researchers from Harvard University, while studying a family of butterflies, think they have witnessed a subtle process, which could be forcing a wedge between such newly formed branches/species.
They found that closely related butterfly species (of genus Agrodiaetus, in Asia) living in the same geographical space displayed unusually distinct wing markings. These wing colors apparently evolved so as to allow the butterflies to easily identify the species of a potential mate.
It seems that if closely related species of Agrodiaetus are geographically separate, they tend to look quite similar. But when they are living side-by-side, they look strikingly different! This has the effect of discouraging inter-species mating, thus encouraging genetic isolation and species divergence:):).
However, at least to me, it is not obvious what is cause and what is effect. It could very well be, that because the species has developed the distinct markings while living in close quarters, that speciation was able to happen, rather than the other way round! Perhaps more research is needed to pin that one down:):).

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At July 25, 2005 3:32 AM, Blogger abnegator said...
Coooooool blog...How did i not find it earlier...Its so informative and the pics are too cool..keep up the good work
 
At July 25, 2005 7:07 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks:). Please keep visiting!
 
At July 25, 2005 9:34 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Too bad that hasn't happened with some humans...
 
At July 25, 2005 9:45 AM, Blogger trejrco said...
... I was just gonna say I wish certain people I know had been subject to (non-) "Reproductive Isolation"

:)
/TJ
 
At July 25, 2005 4:01 PM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL, you two :).
 
At July 26, 2005 3:25 AM, Blogger Sray said...
No I am not :). You take care too :).
 
At July 26, 2005 12:26 PM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Heh!He is lying!He is a scientist!:D:D
I wonn come here then, u didnn ask me to do that haa:D:D:D
 
At July 26, 2005 2:19 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna, I am not a professor. You know that!

And I dont have to ask you to visit, you will do it anyway :D:D.
 
At July 26, 2005 2:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Lunatic: Welcome :). Hope you keep visiting, and I can see you are just starting to blog... hope to see you around :):).
 

Post a Comment