Saturday, July 02, 2005
This Day:

Supernovae are exploding stars, which happen when heavy stars (weighing larger than 1.4 times the mass of our Sun) at the end of their life cycle shed their outer layers in a gigantic explosion. In many ways, it can be compared to a nuclear explosion, whose power is such that the atoms in the exploding gas fuse to form heavier-than-iron metals (Gold, Silver, Platinum, etc.) and other minerals as well. It is theorized that our own solar system might owe its existence to such an explosion, since we have such large amounts of heavy metals in our solar system:).

Mineral Olivine from Supernova! (Courtesy: Johnson Space Center)
Now a team of scientists from NASA and University of Arizona have discovered minerals that were formed in such a supernova explosion!! The grains were among other extraterrestrial dust plucked by high-flying NASA research aircraft from Earth's upper atmosphere after they were delivered to Earth by a comet or primitive asteroid:D:D.
It is the first time anyone has ever discovered silicate grains, in this case Olivine (a Magnesium-Iron Silicate), from a supernova. They reveal important new information on how much material supernovae contributed to making our sun and planets, including radioactive material used in isotope age-dating techniques. The discovery also gives astrophysicists important new physical evidence they need to verify complex numerical models of supernovae explosions.
A new kind of ion microprobe called the NanoSIMS was used to measure Oxygen isotopes in the unusual grains obtained by a high-flying spacecraft. Olivine is very common in the solar system (and is found both on Earth and on Mars, and in comets and asteroids); but these grains of Olivine have oxygen isotope content seen only in theoretical models of supernova explosions. The grains are often formed when the gas cools after a supernova explosion of a star 15 times as massive as the Sun:):).
Thus, this finding provides further proof that our solar system was formed after a supernova explosion of a star 15 times as massive as Sun about 4.5 Billion Years ago... scientists will now try to find this supernova remnant (the core that is left behind after the explosion), which undoubtedly will be a Black Hole, or a White Dwarf, and perhaps thousands of light years away from us:):).

(Hide) (Show)

2 Comments:

At July 02, 2005 10:01 PM, Blogger KL said...
Theoretical study of supernova is still incomplete, ie, not a fully understood/proved field. So, how much sure the scientists are those mineral came from supernovae? Are any other research group going against this claim? Also how do they know that those transported by some asteroids/commets? And, why they are only found in atmosphere and not in ground?
 
At July 02, 2005 10:06 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I agree.. this is still quite speculative, and more studies are needed. But this much is certain: the Olivine is NOT from Earth or Mars or any comet/asteroid. The spaecraft captured orbiting dust particles, and these particles would annihilate in our atmosphere during entry, so it is nearly impossible to find them on ground:).
 

Post a Comment

Friday, July 01, 2005
This Day:

Everyone who has ever ridden a bike knows how heavy a bike can be, and this is a pain, especially when climbing up hills or mountains :(. Now the Swiss manufacturer BMC has designed a Carbon-NanoTube-based bike, which weighs less than a kilogram (about 2.2 pounds)!! In this year’s Tour de France, cyclists from the Phonak Team will use such bikes:).

BMC Pro Machine NanoTube-Bike (Courtesy: BMC)
To create the frame, BMC used a composite technology developed by US sports equipment specialist Easton. The company's Enhanced Resin System embeds carbon fibre in a resin matrix that's reinforced with carbon nanotubes.
Carbon nanotubes are an array of carbon atoms arranged in a pattern of hexagons and pentagons (similar to the pattern found on soccer balls). These structures can be manufactured in tubular shapes one billionth of a meter in diameter, hence the name nanotube. These tubes are the strongest man-made fibers, 100s of times stronger than steel, yet lighter:):).
Soon we might see more applications of nanotubes in other areas of transportation. I am looking forward to the day when there will be a car with Carbon-NanoTube chassis, running on fuel-cells, and fully computerized. Surely I can then turn on my favorite music, close my eyes, and enjoy the ride?:D:D... the car can do the driving:).

(Hide) (Show)

10 Comments:

At July 02, 2005 1:23 PM, Blogger Sray said...
That is true.. but remember that Carbon Tubes are highly bendable! Consider for example a horizontal beam in the bike. If the nanotube axis is aligned with the bar, then this gives the bar extremely high tensile, shear, and bending strength!! So it all depends on if the whole bar is made of a single chain of Carbon rings.
 
At July 02, 2005 9:55 PM, Blogger KL said...
Any idea how much those bikes cost? Can I have one ;);)?

How will it help to have a lighter chasis for a car ? Driver more faster? Also what are the environmental hazards/helpful for such carbon-nanotube made transportations?
 
At July 02, 2005 10:02 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Dear KL: :D:D:D... the bike has not yet been released to the masses, so its price is still a secret, as far as I could tell. About car chassis... if a car-frame is lighter, it has several benefits! 1) Less fuel consumption, 2) Better acceleration curve, and 3) Lesser damage to the occupants during a crash (due to lesser kinetic energy of the car) :). About environmental hazards... carbon is one of the most common elements, and the nanotube frame is non-toxic, and biodegradable, so better for the environment as well!!
 
At July 05, 2005 8:10 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
"I am looking forward to the day when there will be a car with Carbon-NanoTube chassis, running on fuel-cells, and fully computerized."

Don't know about the 'fully computerized' part. Sounds like all of the fun will be taken out of driving.

A bit like having an automatic gear box, or column-shift, which is just plain boring.

What I will say is, the sooner they start making cars out of these, the better.

There will come a time when the heaviest item in a car is the passenger...
 
At July 05, 2005 11:27 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: 'Fully computerized' was loose-talk for 'intelligent machines' that could drive or 'course-correct' if need be. If I am veering off the lane without my indicator on, the car should be able to force me to stay in lane (or something like that). We still drive, but the car does keep an eye on the road too :). BTW, the way things are going in USA, soon the passenger will be the heaviest item, carbon frame or not....
 
At July 05, 2005 11:28 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Atheist: I am sure this will revolutionize motorcycles too :):). But I was thinking: is too light a good thing? You need the momentum to give u the grip on the road.. too light a bike, and it might take off at the slightest bump, or skid off the tracks.
 
At July 05, 2005 2:30 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Motorbikes being too light is a bad thing.

Most of the more powerful bikes can easily lift onto the back wheel simply by opening up the throttle...
 
At July 05, 2005 3:56 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Too light, and the bike will take off like a rocket :))...
 
At July 06, 2005 6:53 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I do not ride a bike... so correct me if I am wrong. My understanding is that the lighter the bike, the wider the tires would be, so that it can grip the road better during a tighter and faster turn. Is this true? Also, how much does wind affect a lighter bike, as compared to a heavier one? What is the cross-section area presented to the wind front, when you ride your bike? I assume that for better bikes, this cross-section has to be smaller.
 
At July 08, 2005 10:11 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yes, that is true. But I still wonder if a lighter bike is more prone to wobbling, or taking off, or getting swept away in the wind (perhaps not, if the cross-section is smaller)? Also, I thought a lighter bike would be a problem if the rider is heavy, as the setup then becomes top-heavy and more prone to instabilities! That is why I was wondering if the tires would be wider, so as to stop the bike from wobbling during a turn?.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, June 30, 2005
This Day:

The world's largest telescope is currently being built in Steward Observatory, Arizona. The first (and the most critical) component of the telescope is to be casted soon; 8.4 meter diameter mirrors, which will more than quadruple the power of today's best observatories:):). The mirror will be created by pouring liquid glass onto a huge mold, the last of whose 1,681 ceramic fiber cores was recently added.

Installing the core (Courtesy: University of Arizona)

The mirror is for the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT), which when completed will have seven of such large mirrors! The mirrors will give GMT four-and-one-half times the collecting area of any current optical telescope and the resolving power of a 25.6-meter (84-foot) diameter telescope, or 10 times the resolution of the Hubble Space Telescope:):).
Obviously, to build such a large, blemish-free mirror is a Herculean task. The Mirror Lab will start heating the furnace July 18, 2005. It takes six days for the glass to reach peak temperature at 2150 ºF (1178 ºC). At this temperature, the glass begins to flow like honey at room temperature. The thick liquid glass flows between the hexagonal cores in the mold to create a honeycomb structure. The oven's rotation rate determines the depth of the curve spun into the shape of the mirror, or the mirror's focal length. The whole process will take 11-12 weeks.
The GMT is slated for completion in 2016 at a site in northern Chile. With its powerful resolution and enormous collecting area, the GMT will be used to detect extrasolar planets, understanding the formation and evolution of galaxies, probing dark matter and dark energy, finding the link between black holes and galactic bulges, and so on and on:).

(Hide) (Show)

1 Comments:

At July 02, 2005 1:25 PM, Blogger Sray said...
They mostly view through monitors. The images gathered by the telescope are so faint (as the objects being photographed are millions of light years away), that you have to expose the photographic plate (or the CCD plate) for hours at times! Once enough light is collected this way, one could see (the digitally processed version of) it on a monitor.
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, June 29, 2005
This Day:

A Japanese research team has discovered part of a mural painting in the ruins of the colossal stone Buddha statues in Bamiyan, central Afghanistan, that were destroyed by the country's former Taliban rulers. The mural was found in a small cave carved into a cliff on the eastern side of the statues, according to team leader Kazuya Yamauchi, chief researcher of the National Research Institute for Cultural Properties of Tokyo. The painting, made on the dome-shaped roof of the cave measuring 2. 5 meters across, appears to be of the torso of a Buddha:).

The Mural (Courtesy: UNESCO)
Patches of a vivid blue pattern made with lapis lazuli are all that remain of the painting, which is thought to have originally been of several Buddha images radiating outward from the center of the roof. The cave is likely to have fallen in on itself, and as a result the overall shape of the painting is obscured by rocks that have accumulated inside.
Dye characteristics date the mural to the sixth or seventh century, the golden age of Buddhist culture at Bamiyan:).

(Hide) (Show)

3 Comments:

At July 01, 2005 1:34 PM, Blogger KL said...
Thanks Goodness! atleast something of Bamiyan is saved. Any news of whether the murals date earlier or later than the statues? How much have they been able to study to say the mural is of Indian or Tibetan or Chinese painting style? :):):)
 
At July 01, 2005 10:32 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The Buddhas in Bamiyan were built around 5th-7th Century AD, the same time the murals were painted. The region lies on the old Silk Road, and was a major center of religion and philosophy and was the site of several Buddhist monasteries. A blend of east and west, the paintings and sculptures were/are emblematic of the Greco-Budhhist art:):)... which started during Alexander's time, and continued till the Islamic conquest around 800 AD.
 
At July 02, 2005 1:26 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I know :(. And too after years of painstaking recovery and restoration by Western, Japanese and Indian researchers and archaeologists :(.
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, June 28, 2005
This Day:

Why cannot we tickle ourselves? It seems that the brain ignores unimportant sensations, such as your own arm touching your belly, so that it can focus on more important stimuli (especially for people like KL), like a cockroach sitting on your neck;). A recent study detailed in the latest issue of the journal Current Biology confirms the results obtained by earlier researchers studying this question.

Tickle Tickle! (Courtesy: Association For Pastoral Care)
In the study, 30 people used a finger on their right hand to touch a finger on their left hand by tapping a device place directly over the left finger and could instantly relay the tap. The computer-controlled device could introduce delays of varying length before the left finger was tapped. Researchers used another button to introduce externally generated taps. Result: when the brain was expecting the tap, it noticed it less :).
It confirms the theory that the brain is constantly predicting what is going to happen, and what sensations it is about to receive. It behaves so, because the information that our senses get are always a little out-of-date, and the brain has to extrapolate to get the most probable information. For example, when a ball is thrown at us, we predict where the ball would be in the next second, and our hands get prepared to catch it in that position!
So next time I meet you people (you know who you are!), get ready for some really awesome tickling :D:D.

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At June 30, 2005 11:24 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Are you ticklish Sray?
 
At June 30, 2005 3:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Welcome back, Atheist :). I didnt know they are blocking blogs at government organizations too! Hope you can find some time to update your wonderful blog!
 
At June 30, 2005 3:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Broomhilda: A little bit, yes!
 
At June 30, 2005 5:21 PM, Blogger Sray said...
When I read KBI.. I suddenly had a vision of KGB and FBI rolled into one :)).. hope it is not that sinister :). So now on, you can blog then? Good :D.. we are waiting for lots of good posts now :).
 
At June 30, 2005 8:30 PM, Blogger KL said...
I've been informed by that person that she is really ready for a big fight whenever certain donkey comes to tickle her ;););)....
 
At July 01, 2005 1:35 AM, Blogger Sray said...
:D:D.. we will see!!
 
At July 01, 2005 1:25 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
KL, I think we shoud get out the duct tape and feathers - time to tickle a certain donkey.
 
At July 01, 2005 1:36 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Broomhilda: As far as I know, KL is afraid of cockroaches, and you are afraid of spiders :D:D:D... so hmmm.. we will see who tickles whom :D:D:D.
 
At July 01, 2005 1:36 PM, Blogger KL said...
Good suggestion, Broomhilda :):):). What sort of feathers do you think will tickle most because certain donkey is not easily tickled :)?
 

Post a Comment

Monday, June 27, 2005
This Day:

A huge milestone in modern science will be achieved if we could master controlled fusion reactions. This is the same reaction that powers the Sun, combining four Hydrogen atoms into one Helium atom, and releasing huge amounts of energy in the process. For example, a thimbleful of liquid Hydrogen fuel could produce as much energy as 20 tons of coal!! Moreover, with fossil fules (coal, petroleum) depleting at a high rate, and their mining becoming harder and more expensive, it makes sense to invest in fusion technologies.
With this in mind, a consortium of six (China, EU, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the USA) have finally decided to attempt to build a experimental fusion reactor called ITER in Cadarache in the south of France.

Tokamak Diagram (Courtesy: MIT)
ITER stands for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. It will use magnetic fields generated by superconducting coils to confine a plasma of Deuterium and Tritium in a donut-shaped chamber called a Tokamak (short for toroidalnya kamera ee magnetnaya katushka - torus-shaped magnetic chamber, first designed by Soviet physicists Andrei Sakharov and Igor Tamm in 1951). The plasma will be heated to millions of degrees, and confined by the powerful magnets so that it does not escape. At such high temperatures, Deuterium and Tritium would overcome their mutual repulsion, and fuse to form Helium and release energy in the process.
ITER is designed to produce 500 MW of power and to demonstrate that it is feasible to generate power from fusion. Construction of ITER should start by the end of this year and should be complete by 2015. Cadarache is already home to Tore Supra, currently the world's largest superconducting tokamak, and some 500 fusion scientists, engineers and technicians, plus another 4000 staff working in other areas. The Cadarache lab, which is close to Marseille, is run by the CEA (French Atomic Energy Commission).
Hopefully, we will see practical applications of this endeavor in our lifetimes :).

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At June 28, 2005 7:51 PM, Blogger KL said...
The current research endevour in this field is how to generate the energy or conduct the thermonuclear reaction in a smaller confinement. So, are the scientists planning to find a path to do so using this larger structure? Also, as you know one of the main difficulties in achieving anything in this field is the handling of all the instablities (Richtmyer-Meshkove, Rayleigh-Taylor, Kelvin-Helmhotz) that arises in in a smaller confinement :-) :-). Do you know any such instabilities that arises when the reaction is done in a larger confinement and if so, how it is handled?
 
At June 28, 2005 9:38 PM, Blogger Sray said...
There are (as of yet) two primary ways of achieving a controlled fusion. The first involves a implosion of a gas bubble by a radially inward shock. The implosion reduces the volume, and thus raises the temperature inside the bubble, which would theoretically lead to fusion. This is more commonly known as Inertial Confinement Fusion. The second technique involves accelerating extremely hot gas (plasma) in a magnetic confinement. Large toroidal magnets accelerate the gas (as ionized gas is accelerated in a magnetic field). This leads to a raising of temperature, and thus optimistically, would lead to fusion. This is the technique employed in the tokamak :).

Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities arise in the ICF case :). In magnetic confinement, there is the problem of plasma leaking away from the confinement volume, thus leading to a loss in energy. The losses occur most in regions where the plasma pressure gradient is in the same direction as the magnetic field curvature. This phenomenon is closely linked to Rayleigh-Taylor instability, as this pressure gradient leads to the denser plasma being pushed through the lighter plasma :):).
 
At June 29, 2005 8:13 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
Why 10 years to complete a proof of concept? Obviously I'm no scientist, but it seems like a long time to me!
 
At June 29, 2005 9:08 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It will take 10 years to build it. It does not sound like a lot of time to me, as a lot of things (physics, construction, electronics, safety, logistics, politics) have to come together to make it happen!
 
At June 30, 2005 3:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am quite comfortable with nuclear fusion. The thing to remember is: there is no radioactive waste! Also, if properly installed and run, it is very safe, at least as safe as fission nuclear plants. There is no lack of fuel (heavy hydrogen), and no problems in transporting it over long distances.
 
At June 30, 2005 5:24 PM, Blogger Sray said...
South Korea, USA and Japan supported Japan to build the reactor. EU, Russia and China supported France. So there was a deadlock. Japan is a good place to build it, but there are problems. First, Japan is an earthquake-prone zone. Second, there are lot more available resources in and near France (world's largest tokamak, as I mentioned in the post, and also CERN is close by). Also, EU offered more money than USA did, so that also tilted in France's favor. But Japan is not going home empty, they are going to have a Director-General level post in France's reactor, and will have a considerable say too.
 
At July 02, 2005 1:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am really not sure why some environmentalists are screaming against the fusion reactors. If matured, it will be the cleanest (after solar and wind perhaps) form of energy yet! And it will last us for 1000s of years!!
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, June 26, 2005
This Day:

This news is Courtesy Gindy.
What if it were possible to live forever? Recent steps by scientists at Safar Centre for Resuscitation Research at University of Pittsburgh have perhaps made this a possibility. The scientists have created zombie dogs, reanimating the canines after several hours of clinical death in attempts to develop suspended animation for humans.

Dead For Two Hours! (Courtesy: Safar Centre)
The dogs were reanimated three hours after their clinical death. The technique involves draining the veins of blood, and replacing it with ice-cold salt solution. The body temperature drops to 7C, enough to induce a state of hypothermia. There is no heartbeat, or brain activity. But when the blood is replaced, the heart restarted with an electric shock and a dose of 100% oxygen is administered, the dogs are brought back to life!!
According to the center, plans to test it on humans should materialize within a year. Other than possible immortality applications, this technique could help save lives on the battlefield, or other critically injured patients. It might also help save patients waiting for organ transplants. Another application is in repairing critical blood vessels; currently, doctors must repair the vessels under a time pressure, as lack of blood would otherwise damage organs that are fed blood through the vessel under repair. During this induced hypothermia, there is no such limitation, as the organs are perfectly preserved:).
Immortality anyone?! ;);).

(Hide) (Show)

21 Comments:

At June 27, 2005 11:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Brrr... Science is getting scarier by the day and I am not liking it...
 
At June 27, 2005 11:53 PM, Blogger Sray said...
This has a lot of benefits, as I outlined in the post already :). Science is never scary.. it is us humans who choose to apply it in wrong ways, and that is scary.
 
At June 28, 2005 10:44 AM, Blogger KL said...
Any report on whether there were any negative side-effects for the 3 hour clinical death :-)?
 
At June 28, 2005 10:57 AM, Blogger KL said...
Acha abar pore eshe shob porbo. Kheyal chilo na etodin - shob kota article maratok interesting. :):):)
 
At June 28, 2005 11:04 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Negative side-effects... none that I could see. But there might be long-term effects that were not captured in this study!
 
At June 28, 2005 11:05 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Eto interesting to etodin portey paroni?! :D:D:D.
 
At June 28, 2005 3:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Are you the same person who writes the blog http://musing-wanderer.blogspot.com ?
 
At June 28, 2005 7:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
No, I am not :).
 
At June 29, 2005 2:57 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Say them I am ready to make their experiments on meeeeeeeeee:D:D
 
At June 29, 2005 2:58 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Funny anonymous!!!!
 
At June 29, 2005 2:59 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Donn think that u r sick,plz, then I will feel sick too haaaaa:D
 
At June 29, 2005 2:59 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Deareee someone!:D Take care of little sick Bonobo:D
 
At June 29, 2005 3:00 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Would u like me to send soup there?:D:D:D
 
At June 29, 2005 5:49 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Experiments on you?! But I thought you are in a zombie state most of the time anyway :p:p:p :D.
 
At June 29, 2005 5:50 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa send some Ash soup :):).. will ya?! >:D< :):).
 
At June 29, 2005 7:18 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
This technique doesn't offer any hope of immortality since it doesn't offer any extension to your life span.

Instead, you're given the choice of extending the period of your life through longer periods of 'deep sleep'...
 
At June 29, 2005 7:27 AM, Blogger Sray said...
True. But if I am really sick with a incurable disease today, I might choose to go into deep sleep, and woken up when there is a treatment... since I do expect humanity to conquer death (may be 200 years down the line, who knows?), there does exist this possibility of immortality (or at least immunity from any natural death).
 
At June 29, 2005 10:46 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
"... since I do expect humanity to conquer death (may be 200 years down the line, who knows?)"

Sooner .. much sooner...
 
At June 29, 2005 11:08 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa I too suspect it will be sooner rather than later, perhaps even in our lifetime :).
 
At July 01, 2005 4:56 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Technology is and always has been a double-edged sword. It is up to us to use it for good, or for bad. This has been the issue since the dawn of human-kind... to use fire to cook, or burn down your neighbor's house!
 
At December 16, 2007 12:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
very creepy .... but also very facinating to read about...in my opinion if this works out on humans no one will ever die!....but then again science I must agree is getting type creepy so well see in the meere future whats in store...
 

Post a Comment