Saturday, May 21, 2005
This Day:

Archimedes was one of the greatest mathematicians of the ancient times, perhaps of all time. Born in 287 BC in Syracuse, ancient Greece, he is reputed to have discovered the principles of density and buoyancy, also known as Archimedes' Principle. He is also credited with the possible invention of the odometer, and use of mirrors to focus sunlight to create fire.
Many of Archimedes' documents were lost during the Middle (Dark) Ages. A copy of one of his most important works, containing part of his Method of Mechanical Theorems was for example scraped down and reused as pages in a thirteenth century prayer book, producing a document known as a palimpsest. Now scientists are trying to decipher the original text by using high-intensity X-rays.

Section from the Archimedes Palimpsest (Courtesy: Stanford)
The palimpsest was discovered in 1906. Some portions of this palimpsest were decipherable. For instance, in 2002, an examination of a portion of the manuscript showed that the Greeks understood the concept of infinity. However, most of the manuscript was thoroughly destroyed by the scraping. So researchers at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory in Menlo Park, California, decided to use X-rays to peer through this modern ink. Iron pigment in the original ink fluoresced when hit by the X-rays, allowing researchers to see the text for the first time.
The first page has now been scanned, but researchers have not yet been able to decipher the writing. Each scan yields a picture of the writing on both sides of each page, along with the thirteenth-century text that also lurks beneath the forged drawings. Different images will have to be compared carefully to unpick the Archimedes text.
The document is of utmost importance. This information locked inside it is not available anywhere else, and might provide an window into the mind of one of the greatest brains of all time. Archimedes was working on a variety of engineering and mathematical problems and puzzles, and it is possible that he might have solved some persistent problems that waited till after Rennaissance to be discovered again. This manuscript might provide us clues to such problems which Archimedes might have solved, some 2000 years before the modern age:):).

(Hide) (Show)

10 Comments:

At May 22, 2005 10:33 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
So, doesnt the new ink also fluoresce under X-rays? Shouldnt it be more than the scraped out ink?

Did the y scrape it all out considering its contents as blashphemy?
 
At May 22, 2005 10:41 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Whoa! sray has switched species!
 
At May 23, 2005 2:33 AM, Blogger Sray said...
The old ink had more iron in it... so it will glow more under the X-ray with frequency corresponding to iron's excitation energy.

By the dark ages, the demand for scientific thoughts was at a low. Most of the manuscripts were therefore reused, as these people didnt know what they were destroying :(.

And I will keep switching species... stay tuned for my next transformation :D:D.
 
At May 23, 2005 7:02 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Were they so short of paper that they had to scrape out older texts?
 
At May 23, 2005 7:07 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I watched a program about Archimedes some years ago.

In the words of one of the various physicists and mathematicians who contributed to the program, in his belief, had the various works of Archimedes survived -- and indeed had Archimedes survived longer himself -- it's possible we could have been on the moon in the seventieth century.

Quite remarkable...
 
At May 23, 2005 9:45 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: They were. Remember that by the middle of the dark ages, much of what was gained during the ancient times was lost. There was no trade in things related to knowledge, and most people were illiterate anyway, so why bother with paper? So the old papers which were of little use, were cannibalized.

Wayne: I watched the same program too, I think (sponsored by the BBC). It seems Archimedes already had an inkling about integral and differential calculus, as he tried to compute volumes of cones and other 3D objects, by (mathematically) slicing them into smaller and smaller parts. We had to wait till Newton and Leibnitz in the 17th century to re-invent calculus!
 
At May 23, 2005 12:08 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Over here, the BBC have a science program called Horizon, so I'm guessing that's what it was and that's what you saw.

It's pretty amazing to think just how different the world might have been had the guy not been killed...
 
At May 24, 2005 12:48 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Wow! I never knew about that! They should have taken him prisoner instead of killing him!
 
At May 24, 2005 2:03 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The soldiers were under orders not to kill him... but some stupid fellow killed him anyway :(... and perhaps changed the course of history?! Dunno if that is too much hyperbole...
 
At September 16, 2005 3:26 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
didnt know that re him.
gosh how stupidity affects..
 

Post a Comment

Friday, May 20, 2005
This Day:

Centennial Challenges is a NASA program of prize contests to stimulate innovation and competition in solar system exploration and ongoing NASA mission areas. The goal is to offer prize money to encourage private individuals, companies and researchers to think about challenging problems and come up with a state-of-the-art solution. NASA has now announced a new challenge, in association with the Florida Space Research Institute. The MoonROx (Moon Regolith Oxygen) challenge will award $250,000 to the first team that can extract breathable oxygen from simulated lunar soil before the prize expires on June 1, 2008:).

Lunar Base Art (Courtesy: NASA Science)
The teams must design and construct hardware that can extract at least five kilograms of breathable oxygen from simulated lunar soil during an eight-hour period. The soil simulant, called JSC-1, is derived from volcanic ash. The extraction technologies required are currently beyond our reach, and the teams must reach their goal while operating under equipment and energy constraints.
To establish a lunar base, or to use the moon for future human explorations, using lunar resources efficiently is key. Once oxygen can be extracted from its soil, engineers can construct liveable bases, where (genetically engineered) plants could be grown, and humans can thus live and work for extended periods of time, without being dependent on the Earth for everything. Thus, moon can be a stepping stone to future explorations to Mars and beyond, which will undoubtedly be much harder, and more complex.

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At May 21, 2005 9:28 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
What are the components of the soil, in terms of chemicals? Since the oxides will be stabler than oxygen, the process will have to be endothermic, so it will be more energy draining.

2008! Thats pretty close! Although I know i wont make it there, its still worth exploring with some of my chem friends!
 
At May 21, 2005 10:06 PM, Blogger Sray said...
If you check this site, you will find detailed description and composition of the JSC-1 soil simulant that will be used.

The oxides are mainly SiO2 (47.3%), FeO (10.5%) and CaO (11.4%). Obviously, the easiest one to extract would be the one with the least binding energy (assuming that the ore is easily extracted). Also, it will be nice if solar energy could be used, and the process has to be efficient enough.

Any ideas, anyone?
 
At May 22, 2005 1:16 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am not sure if anyone will win it. It is a much harder problem actually, than even designing SpaceShipOne. With the ship, one could design models on the computer, and do virtual tests that cut down both costs and time. But with inorganic chemistry, you have to experiment, and that is the only way.

But 2008 is three years away.. so a lot can happen. I am keeping my fingers crossed :D.
 
At May 22, 2005 10:40 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
We will need to treat it with something more electronegative than Oxygen, say F or Cl. And form FeCl2 SiCl2 and stuff (after concentrating it to only the oxides). Then this has to be decomposed at a higher temperature to give back he chlorine and fluorine.

There obviously would be zillion pitfalls in this approach. But, definitely worth p[ondering over. Havent worked out the numbers, catalysts or anything. All my Chem friends are busy right now. Have to hear what other mechanisms they can imagine.
 
At May 23, 2005 2:38 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I agree. But, you have to consider the problem of transporting so much F or Cl (both of which are volatile) to moon! So even though it looks like a good solution, it is not practical. Also, extracting F or Cl on Earth will be quite energy intensive, and also the scientists would need something they can do on moon itself.. they cannot wait for F or Cl shipments from Earth!

One interesting approach would be to use bacteria. On earth, there are anaerobic bacteria that reduce iron compounds. Some of these bacteria reduce Ferryl/Ferric to Ferrous, for example, and release one oxygen atom for every one/two iron atoms.

The trick would be to make this bacteria live on moon... so one might need some genetic engineering to do it.
 
At May 23, 2005 7:05 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hmmmm. If it were so simple as i told, they wouldnt have offered a $250K prize for it anyway!
 
At September 16, 2005 3:42 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
:)
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, May 19, 2005
This Day:

The permanent icecap on Mars' South Pole is offset from the pole itself. An interdisciplinary team of scientists thinks it has an answer to this long-standing mystery. Published in the journal Nature, this new understanding about Mars' climate and its polar regions may suggest clues to finding water in the planet's equatorial zone - where it would be easier to land a spacecraft - and opening the door to future exploration and the search for life.

Martian South Pole (Courtesy: NASA)
The southern icecap is made up mostly of carbon dioxide ice - or dry ice - which is the main component of the Martian atmosphere. It is much smaller, about a 10th the size of that at the northern pole, and it is all on one side of the pole. The other side of the pole contains a much larger area known as 'the Cryptic Region,' which is made up of seasonal ice in the winter but has low albedo, or reflectivity. The question was: why is the ice deposition so peculiar?
The scientists were able to use images from the Mars Global Surveyor, temperature information, and climate models to develop a new theory. It looks like Mars has an asymmetrical climate at its south pole. According to the researcher Dr. Barnes, the planet has huge volcanoes and mountains that extend from well north of the equator to the southern hemisphere, and two gigantic basins in the south. The wind blowing over these topographic features sets up large-scale patterns that have a profound impact on the climate. This ultimately causes a skewed deposition of ice, and so we see a skewed distribution of the icecap:):).

(Hide) (Show)

8 Comments:

At May 21, 2005 1:18 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hmmmm. Interesting! There are lots of mysteries to be solved everywhere! I'm still in a dilemma as to which subject to specialize in for my masters course!
 
At May 21, 2005 3:40 PM, Blogger Sray said...
What are your interests?! What do you like the most?
 
At May 21, 2005 9:19 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
I had initially FIRMLY decided on Nanotech. Then somehow, other stuff caught my attention. I became interested in cosmology, theoretical physics, astrophysics and more recently biophysics.

Looking at myself from the outside, i appear to be good at experimenting, especially ones that are used to prove/disprove theories. And I'm pretty much interested in that too.

U have hardly half a year to decide which of them I have to choose. And I would like to join a field with good enough and numerous enough challenges.

The problem is that i dont like anything 'the most'
 
At May 21, 2005 9:21 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
And yea.... I know i wont stick to one subject thruout my life. So, ease of hopping into another field might also need consideration!

Darn! I'm confused again :(
 
At May 21, 2005 9:58 PM, Blogger Sray said...
"So, ease of hopping into another field might also need consideration!"

Exactly. But if you do not plan to hop onto another field, but just collaborate, then nanotech, biophysics and astrophysics are all nice bets! All these fields are set to explode in the next decade, so I am sure you will always have exciting open problems to dabble in :):).

Good luck! And best wishes :).
 
At May 21, 2005 10:54 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
I would hop onto another field only after some 5-10 yrs. I'm not a software engineer who hops every year!
 
At May 22, 2005 1:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I think so. The region has been a mystery for a while, especially because of its weird climatic patterns. You can find more details here.
 
At September 16, 2005 3:48 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting:)
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, May 18, 2005
This Day:

All the matter and energy in our universe are composed of a set of (as yet known) fundamental particles. These particles fall into two major classes: Fermions and Bosons. Fermions (named after Italian scientist Enrico Fermi) follow Pauli's Exclusion Principle by which no two Fermion can occupy the same energy state. Electrons, Protons and Neutrons are all Fermions. Bosons (named after Indian scientist Satyendra Nath Bose) do not follow the Pauli Principle. Photons (particles of light, carrier of the electromagnetic force), and Gluons (carrier of the strong nuclear force, that binds protons and neutrons into atomic nuclei) are Bosons.

Fundamental Particles (Courtesy: Scott Menary)
Interestingly, all the matter particles are Fermions, and the force/energy particles are Bosons! The fundamental particles combine in different ways to give rise to the beautiful world we see all around us:).
The matter particles are further classified into Leptons (which includes the electrons, positrons and neutrinos), and Quarks (of which there are six varieties: up, down, strange charmed, top and bottom) which make up protons and neutrons. The force particles are photon (electromagnetic force), gluon (strong nuclear force), W and Z boson (weak nuclear force, responsible for radioactivity).
Now why all this talk about particle physics?! Because scientists are slowly unravelling the secrets of this ultra-small world, and recently physicists may have discovered the first hybrid meson at the KEK laboratory in Japan. Mesons are normally made up of a quark and an anti-quark. But this hybrid meson contains a gluon as well:). The meson was first predicted 25 years ago, and its detection suggests that scientists are on the right track with their theories.
The new meson was observed in electron-positron collisions by the international Belle collaboration at KEK and quickly decays into two well-known particles called the Omega and J/psi. The properties of the decay have led the Belle team to believe that it is not a standard quark-antiquark particle but may be a hybrid meson containing a charm quark, a charm antiquark and a gluon.
The new meson is the latest in a list of recent surprising discoveries in particle physics. These include several particles called pentaquarks (which may or may not exist) that contain five quarks, a particle called the X(3872) that appears to be made of four quarks, and another meson called the Ds(2317) that does not behave as predicted.
We still have a lot to learn:):):).

(Hide) (Show)

12 Comments:

At May 20, 2005 3:28 AM, Blogger KL said...
Surprise! Surprise! :):). Thank you, Dear(SLHK), for that synopsis of particle physics as I struggle to remember them. Now, whenever I forget it, I can come online and review them. :):)
 
At May 20, 2005 3:30 AM, Blogger Sray said...
We two form a hybrid meson, but I am wondering who the gluon could be ;);).
 
At May 20, 2005 5:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Does it bring us any closer to the Higgs Boson??
 
At May 20, 2005 7:41 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Yikes Crappy! Where did the Higgs come in from? I had read in an article long ago(say 3 or 4 yrs) that the cause of some effect in a CERN expt was due to the Higgs Boson. I thought that the Higgs was considered discovered due to the expt. But I've heard a lot abt it as 'yet to be discovered'. So, Thassal I gotta say abt the Higgs.

@sray: Does hybrid meson mean only that it has a non quark-antiquark particle in it? Or is there more to it?
 
At May 20, 2005 10:51 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
fasinating.
 
At May 20, 2005 1:09 PM, Blogger LEMNA said...
The gluon?!It will come later:D:D
 
At May 21, 2005 4:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Higgs Boson have been theorized as the particle that when found, will solve the question of where do the particles (and ultimately, us and objects around us) get their mass from, and why they have the mass that they have. However, they are still hypothetical, and no experiment has yet found it. I know that BNL is trying to set up an experiment to find it, and so is CERN (Large Hadron Collider, starting in 2007).

Arcane and Sudhir: This meson is a totally different fish, of course. Higgs Bosons are supposed to be really heavy (about 117Gev), but the mesons are relatively much lighter. Moreover, the meson is a Fermion (as it is composed of quarks), and Higgs is a boson (a field particle). So I dont see any direct connection, but of course since the Boson sets up the mass of things, a tight bound on the mass of the new meson might put a tighter bound on the mass of the Higgs particle as well.
 
At May 21, 2005 4:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: Hybrid means just that.. that it is a hybrid between two Fermions and one Boson.
 
At May 21, 2005 4:02 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: ;);)... hmmm... talk to you later :D.
 
At May 21, 2005 4:04 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: :)):)). I tried to give a flavor of particle physics in 350 words :D.. ask me if you have any questions :).
 
At May 21, 2005 1:14 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Thats the best 350 word summary of particle physics I've ever seen!
 
At September 16, 2005 3:56 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
though i hate physics, must admit the post was interesting and i could grasp what u wrote about.

PS :pity u dont write textbooks:)
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, May 17, 2005
This Day:

LG Electronics has unveiled the world's first terrestrial digital multimedia broadcast receiving mobile (DMB) television-enabled notebook computers. This technology will allow users to watch High-Definition mobile digital broadcasts via laptop PCs anywhere, anytime. The notebook uses Intel Centrino processors. The model features a 14-inch wide LCD screen with a WXGA resolution of 1280x768 and a contrast ratio of 15:9, perfect for watching DVD titles and films.

Mobile TV-enabled Notebook (Courtesy: AME Info)
The notebook PC features functions like watching and recording terrestrial broadcasts, channel registration, broadcasting-reception sense indication, picture capture and channel scanning. The notebook also does an intelligent update where it automatically upgrades software to improve user convenience.
There are, currently, three versions of the DMB enabled notebook PC with different form factors. The premium notebook PC (model: LW40-P1LK) features a Pentium M 1.6GHz CPU, 512MB Double Data Rate 2 (DDR2) memory, and large capacity hard disk drive at 80GB. This model also utilises the high performance graphic chip (ATI Mobility Radeon X600) to enhance entertainment functions such as 3D games and videos.
This opens up a world of possibilities. The technology is fast moving towards an integration of the television world, the computing world, and the mobile phone world. Soon we will need only one device that will offer us all of them, and would be cheap, portable, energy-efficient, and light-weight:):):).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At May 18, 2005 9:55 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Whats the price? I know I cant afford it. But still curious!
 
At May 18, 2005 11:07 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hmm... I dont think they have set a price yet... it is not yet being marketed. But it need not be very costly, I think... lets wait and see :).
 
At May 19, 2005 4:02 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Me same question:) but cheap? hmm,ok,wait and watch
 
At May 19, 2005 6:09 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hopefully, prices will come down :).... but I am sure they will :D:D.
 
At May 21, 2005 5:49 AM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL :).
 

Post a Comment

Monday, May 16, 2005
This Day:

I have previously talked about nanotubes (tube like structures, e.g. composed of carbon atoms, of the order of 10-8 meters in size) in several of my previous posts (NanoTube Fuel Cell, One Minute Recharge, Fuel From Water). Nanotechnology offers a lots of benefits, including minute robots, faster computers, and stronger materials. However, scientists must understand the nanotube behavior under all circumstances (temperature, pressure) to be able to fully harness its potential benefits.

Poking a nanotube (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
In a recent study, researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology, IBM Watson Research Center and the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne in Switzerland, found that while nanotubes are extremely stiff when pulled from the ends, they give when poked in the middle. The softness is dependent on the radius of the tube. The findings (published in the journal Physical Review Letters) are extremely important for the development of nano-electronics and nano-materials.
Using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and testing it with a tip of 35 nanometers in radius, researchers lightly prodded the nanotubes to measure the elasticity. Understanding just how much these nanotubes of various sizes and layers can bend is an important step in the development of nanoelectronics and the nanowires that carry electrical current through them. Recently, a team of scientists at the University of California, Irvine, demonstrated that transistors made of single-walled nanotubes can operate at much faster speeds than traditional transistors. Knowing just how far these tubes can bend may lead to even more efficient nanowires.
Such fundamental research on the behavior of nanotubes is necessary, as only by knowing the full range of its behavior can scientists finally hope to use the technology in future materials, computers, and almost everything else.

(Hide) (Show)

6 Comments:

At May 18, 2005 7:10 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:D
 
At May 18, 2005 11:49 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
U mean to say that it is easy to cut a nanotube sideways? Oh! So that makes so many of my dreams shatter! :(
 
At May 18, 2005 11:53 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hey! Saw the new audioblogs on ur sidebar. I went to the site and saw that u have 2 pay 50$ a yr for it or get a free 7 day trial. Are u payin for it? Or will it be here only for a week?

And dont u need rights to put songs up ur blog? (I know that the old hindi ones wont sue u. But stil....)
 
At May 18, 2005 1:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
How does it vary with the radius? Any quantitative estimates?
 
At May 18, 2005 2:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: It is easier, but it depends on the inner and outer radii of the tube. That is, if the tube wall is thicker, it is harder to cut it. Also, certain additives in the carbon structure might strengthen it, so it is not all over yet :)).

Abt. the audioblog: yaa i have to pay about that much. And I am not sharing songs, I am only putting up some of what I have. And the songs will be quite old, at least 20 years or more...

Arcane: Softening of the tube occurs as the inner radius is increased (thus shrinking the tube wall). It seems that the strength of the tube is directly proportional to the number of carbon layers in the wall... so thicker the wall, stronger the tube.
 
At May 18, 2005 9:50 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Got it! ***dreams again***

Abt the audioblogs: ok. then its not for me!
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, May 15, 2005
This Day:

Our Milky Way galaxy is a typical spiral galaxy, about 100,000 light years across, and with about 1011 stars. However, it is also quite interesting in that it has a bunch of satellite galaxies around it, arranged in the same plane as the galaxy! Cosmological theory predicts that these galaxies should occupy a large, nearly spherical halo, but the pancake-like structure has baffled scientists for a long time. Now, finally, the puzzle has perhaps been solved.

Milky Way (Courtesy: CNN)
All galaxies have satellite galaxies, which inhabit pockets of dark matter. Dark matter does not interact with light and the only way that we can infer its existence is by detecting the gravitational influence it exerts on normal matter, such as stars. Soon after the Big Bang, cold dark matter formed the universe’s first large-scale structures, which then collapsed under their own weight to form vast halos. Normal matter was attracted to these halos, and galaxies were formed. But, this should lead to a central large galaxy, surrounded by smaller galaxies arranged in a sphere. But Milky Way's satellites are arranged in a flat circle!
Scientists from University of Durham simulated the evolution of parts of the universe, randomly selected from a large cosmological volume, using a sophisticated supercomputer model. They carried out six simulations, and found that galaxies must end up in such a pancake-like distribution:). With this research, an important puzzle has been solved, and a coherent picture of how galaxies like the Milky Way emerged from the Big Bang is now beginning to fall into place.
More research and simulations will try to understand the formations of even larger galaxies, and perhaps evolution of galactic clusters as well.

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At May 17, 2005 7:04 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
"Soon after the Big Bang, cold dark matter formed the universe’s first large-scale structures, which then collapsed under their own weight to form vast halos"

Why halos? Shouldnt they be spherical?
 
At May 17, 2005 6:36 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Well, they were spherical. But when we see them from our point of view (by looking at ancient galaxies, say billions of light years away), they look like halos!
 
At May 17, 2005 9:31 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Got it!
 
At May 18, 2005 3:34 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hey, no problem. I have been reading your blog for a long time... so I know what you meant :).
 

Post a Comment