Saturday, June 04, 2005
This Day:

There has been considerable debate surrounding the origins of birds. Many believe that birds are descendants of dinosaurs, who were nearly wiped out about 65 million years ago (See my old post on periodic mass extinctions). But now scientists might have finally solved the puzzle once and for all:). A type of bone that female birds use as a calcium reserve for making eggshell has been found inside the fossilised thigh bone of a 68 million years old Tyrannosaurus Rex. The bone, called medullary bone, is densely rich in minerals and blood vessels, and is unique to ovulating female birds, who need the calcium to make the egg shells.

T. Rex tissue and bone (Courtesy: Pangea Institute)
The calcium reserves are critical for female birds because they have strong but lightly-structured bones. Without medullary bone deposited in their marrow cavities, the calcium used for egg shells would come from their bones, giving them avian osteoporosis. Forming the shells depletes medullary bone, which in living birds remains depleted during brooding and until their next ovulation. The formation of the bone is triggered by an increase in estrogen levels.
The same distinctive structure of medullary bone were found in the T. Rex tissues. The T. Rex medullary bone is virtually identical in structure, orientation and even color, to that found in living emus and ostriches - large animals which are close to the evolutionary roots of modern birds. Living crocodiles do not have medullary bone, perhaps putting them farther in the evolutionary tree from dinosaurs than the birds:D:D.

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At June 05, 2005 1:01 PM, Blogger Sray said...
This was the first time actual tissue sample was found. So in that sense, it was very lucky. C14 wont help, as the dinosaur remains are millions of years old and C14 works only upto few tens of thousands of years. Dinosaur remains are usually dated by a) Depth at which they are buried (with other plant/animal remains that have previously been dated) b) Magnetic field indicators in the rock strata c) radioactive (U-235) dating. Precise conclusions are almost always impossible, but in this particular case, it was quite obvious that the dinosaur remains are genetically closer to modern birds than modern reptiles. It is possible that perhaps both dinosaurs and birds evolved the same mechanism separately, but it is unlikely that it will be exactly the same, as is the case here.
 
At June 06, 2005 7:12 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Given that the T-Rex was flightless, I'm guessing that the calcium depletion was far less of a problem than it is for birds, given the relative size of eggs between the two animals...
 
At June 06, 2005 7:21 AM, Blogger Sray said...
True. Btu remember that the similarties were most between T Rex and the modern flightless birds (emus and ostriches), so I am guessing there is a particular way medullary bone develops in flightless birds/dinosaurs.
 
At June 06, 2005 8:05 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
So how do modern flying birds deal with calcium depletion?

Surely this is much bigger problem for them to deal with than an Ostrich which has much denser bones...
 
At June 06, 2005 8:18 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Flying birds deal with it in the same way too! But the dino medullary bones show the same growth patterns as the modern flightless birds... also, modern flying birds have much smaller eggs, so I am assuming they need less calcium to make the shell (ostrich has the largest bird-egg, if I recall correctly)..
 
At June 06, 2005 10:46 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I would have thought that it was the other way around; because of the relative size of the eggs, proportionate to the size of the animal, that birds would have suffered greatest...
 
At June 06, 2005 2:30 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Question is: What increases faster with body-size, the bone-mass, or the egg-shell-size?
 
At June 08, 2005 8:25 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
But if the bone mass is much more dense to begin with, would it matter?

The case in point being the T-Rex which has a much greater density of bone than any modern bird...
 
At December 14, 2005 10:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Comment
 

Post a Comment

Friday, June 03, 2005
This Day:

Most of our energy requirements today are met by fossil fuels. These fuels were created in the interior of the Earth, when rotting ancient animal and plant remains got pressurized by the crust. As we use more and more of these fuels, it becomes harder and harder to mine/drill and transport and refine them for use. Some better way has to be found to meet our growing energy needs, and bio-fuel is one of them.

Fuel Cycle (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
University of Wisconsin researchers have discovered a new way to make a diesel-like liquid fuel from carbohydrates commonly found in plants:). Published in the journal Science, Steenbock Professor James Dumesic and colleagues detail a four-phase catalytic reactor in which corn and other biomass-derived carbohydrates can be converted to sulfur-free liquid alkanes resulting in an ideal additive for diesel transportation fuel.
The process is very efficient, as the fuel contains 90% of the energy found in the carbohydrate and hydrogen feed. This process has twice the potential to create Ethanol (Ethyl Alcohol) than corn. Corn produces 1.1 units of energy for every unit of energy consumed. This process creates 2.2 units of energy for every unit of energy consumed in energy production:):).
The process works with a range of carbohydrates. As About 75% of the dry weight plants and trees is carbohydrates, a wider range of plants can be used to make bio-fuel.

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At June 04, 2005 7:23 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Excellent news in times of Climate Change caused by carbon dioxide.
Good luck with the fundraising for the project!
 
At June 04, 2005 8:01 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
By the way, I forgot to mention Brazil has been developing a programme in this area called proalcool since 1974 and it has great similarities to this one described in your article.
About fighting against world poverty I found nice report: Why world poverty is a trade issue - and why the G8 must address it
Have a great weekend !
Namaste!
 
At June 04, 2005 5:03 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I looked up proalcool.. woww, it is a nice product! But it seems it works only with sugarcane, which is a hard to come-by resource in many parts of the world, as it needs lots of water to grow. So, this new technique (in my post) is better, as it can work on dry wood (cellulose) as opposed to glucose (in sugarcanes).
 
At June 04, 2005 11:09 PM, Blogger Sray said...
It does put greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. But if we could use biomass directly to convert into energy, that will be much easier than importing huge amounts of oil, or to set up refineries.
 
At June 05, 2005 5:30 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Tip Toe,Tip Toe,Tip Toe...:D
 
At June 05, 2005 7:56 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I heard ittt :D:D....
 
At June 06, 2005 2:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
90% sounds quite a lot... also, remember that there should be less of CO, SO2 and metallic-oxide pollution if bio-mass is used.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, June 02, 2005
This Day:

Oppurtunity and Spirit are two semi-autonomous rovers that are currently surveying the Martian landscape. Built by NASA, Opportunity is the second of the two rovers of NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Mission. She landed successfully on Mars on January 24, 2004.
In addition to enormously valuable scientific work, both the rovers have also wowed us with lovely pictures (Spirit here, Oppurtunity here) from the red planet:). The latest image from Oppurtunity is a particularly poignant one, as the rover looks up in the sky, and finds its home planet, the planet it will never again be able to visit.

Hello Earth! (Courtesy: Mars Exploration Rover Mission)
On its 449th martian day, or sol (April 29, 2005), NASA's Mars rover Opportunity woke up approximately an hour after sunset and took this picture of the fading twilight as the stars began to come out. Set against the fading red glow of the sky, the pale dot near the center of the picture is not a star, but a planet - Earth:):).
Earth appears elongated because it moved slightly during the 15-second exposures. The faintly blue light from the Earth combines with the reddish sky glow to give the pale white appearance.
I wonder when it will be us humans who will be able to take such pictures of Earth, from the surface of Mars.

(Hide) (Show)

3 Comments:

At June 03, 2005 6:13 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The picture really moved me. Just imagine... when we are looking up in the sky, the rover was perhaps looking back at us :). One day, perhaps we can look at other stars and point to them and say: perhaps this species is staring back at us. How cool wil that be?! :):):).
 
At June 04, 2005 12:43 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've no doubt man will eventually set foot on Martian soil, but I have to wonder whether we'd want to go and live there.

One of the characteristics of Mars that is rarely covered in science fiction movies and the like is the difference in gravity.

Getting about Mars would be much different to what it is on Earth.

For one thing, a sort of running jumping motion is probably the most efficient way of getting around.

Also, spending too long on Mars would lead to muscle atrophy and other complications.

I suppose if we lived there long enough, we'd adapt. But if Terrans were to travel to Mars, they would be vastly stronger than their Martian cousins.

Much like the alien in the movie The Predator who weighed in at a svelte quarter of a metric ton and was enormously strong, simply because he came from a planet that was larger than Earth...
 
At June 04, 2005 1:13 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Martian gravity is about one-third of Earth's. Artuhur C. Clarke has really nice stories on how people who were born on Mars can never come to Earth, as the gravity would probably crush them. Initially, I think people might wear some heavy loads to simulate a slightly higher weight, but of course, the increased inertia will take time to get used to. But later generations will adapt...
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, June 01, 2005
This Day:

In mathematics, Power Law is a relationship between two variables (say x and y) which follow a power pattern, e.g. y = axk, where a is a constant. According to physicists Olivier Bénichou and colleagues at the University of Paris and the Curie Institute, animals use power laws to minimize the time they spend searching for hidden objects:):). The study corroborates previous observations made by biologists, and could be used to speed up human searching.

Two-state search strategy (Courtesy: PhysicsWeb)
Animals exhibit two different kinds of behavior while searching. In the first phase they move quickly on a single trajectory from one location to another. Then in the second phase they search the new location by moving around more slowly and randomly -- akin to molecules undergoing diffusion. They carry on this two-phase process until they find the object. Pet owners routinely see this type of behaviour in their dog, for example, when it looks for an object in the garden.
In order to minimize the search period, it seems that the time spent in the first phase is equal to the time spent in the second raised to a certain power, similar to the power law! This particular search technique might also be employed by us humans, for example, searching for a lost object or perhaps even a victim in an avalanche:):).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At June 03, 2005 3:56 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Hummmmm,very interesting pal:D Now say me how can I find sth I lost last year!?:D
 
At June 03, 2005 3:57 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
By the way,I see such things in my pet too,why did u make an example of dog?!:D Rabbits are more intelligent:D:D:D
 
At June 03, 2005 3:58 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:( see Rain is in sulk with u now:D she is saying me to say u that she wonn help u in not making noise then:D
 
At June 03, 2005 5:42 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: Put your nose to the ground, sniff, and search!! :D:D. Rabbits do it too... but the research focussed on dogs :). And Rainy wont sulk with me, she knows me, and will help me again tonight :):):).
 
At June 03, 2005 6:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Animals have learnt the optimal behavior through millions of years of trial and error. It is as if nature is running a optimization routine :):).
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, May 31, 2005
This Day:

Our brains are amazing machines. Whenever we form a new memory, or learn a new trick, our brain forms new connections (synapses) between its cells. The synapses act as the storage (loosely speaking) of both the data (the memory) and the code (the technique behind the trick). Next time when we do the trick, this hard-wired information helps us perform much much better than the last time!
The way computers are currently made has a big drawback: once the microprocessors are made, the instructions inside are fixed. Software can be written to implement any code, but the software approach is almost always slower than a hardware-implemented code.

FPGA: The blocks can be switched on/off during reprogramming (Courtesy: Caltech)
However, an experimental supercomputer made from hardware that can reconfigure itself to tackle different software problems is being built by researchers in Scotland :):). The system is being built by the EPCC (Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre), and uses Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) chips instead of conventional microprocessors. A FPGA is a device that can be reprogrammed after it is manufactured, rather than having its programming fixed during the manufacturing. Therefore, it has some definite advantages over conventional microprocessors; the programming can be changed depending upon how the FPGA will be used.
The new computer incorporates 64 FPGA processing units and will run at 1 teraflop - one trillion mathematical operations per second. This is fairly modest by modern supercomputing standards, as the fastest machines can operate at hundreds of teraflops. This seems modest, But the Edinburgh system will be up to 100 times more energy efficient than a conventional supercomputer of equivalent computing power. The 64-node FPGA machine will also need only as much space as four conventional PCs, while a normal 1 teraflop supercomputer would fill a room:).
If this is successful, researchers will try to transfer several existing supercomputer programs onto the new hardware. If they work, then the supercomputer structure can be further scaled up for higher speeds.

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At June 02, 2005 4:33 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Yesterday I watched a very interesting report about this new super computer - Virgo - which makes simulation of the begining of the Universe.
Watch here. If you want you can speed, the report starts on 31.09 mt
 
At June 02, 2005 7:08 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I have heard of it, and read about it on BBC. Thanks a lot :).
 
At June 02, 2005 8:27 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hmmmm. closing in on stuff like ourselves!
 
At June 02, 2005 8:32 PM, Blogger Sray said...
But conscious machines... that I really cannot imagine even with FPGAs.
 

Post a Comment

Monday, May 30, 2005
This Day:

The Andromeda galaxy is the most familiar of all the spiral galaxies in our sky. Wider and possibly brighter than our own Milky Way, Andromeda is about 2.4 to 2.9 million light years (one light year: the distance light travels in a year) away from the Solar System. It was previously thought that the Andromeda galaxy is 70,000 to 80,000 light years across, but now astronomers using the Keck II telescope in Hawaii have discovered that the galaxy is actually about 220,000 light years across. In comparison, our Milky Way is only about 100,000 light years across!

Andromeda Galaxy (Courtesy: NASA)
Astronomers used the telescope to make new observations of the motions of stars in the most distant outskirts of the spiral galaxy. They found the movement of this sparse smattering of far-flung stars is actually synchronised with the rest of the galaxy's stars, rotating in an orderly way around its galactic centre. The stars surrounding Andromeda's spiral arms had been seen before, but astronomers had assumed they were captured fragments of other galaxies that would retain their own, essentially random, stellar motions.
The findings are hard to reconcile with current theories and computer models of galaxy formation, according to Rodrigo Ibata of the Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, France, and another member of the research team. According to them, you just don't get giant rotating discs from the accretion of small galaxy fragments.
So back to rewriting the theories :):).

(Hide) (Show)

17 Comments:

At June 01, 2005 5:56 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
The picture is amazingly beautiful and the discovery is really great!
Thanks for Keck 2 and its staff.
The discovery of the stars performing in that particular way is still intriguing to me.
It seems to me there is always a "general" order in the universe...Or at least, if you fall or has been attracted on somebody's orbit.;-)
 
At June 01, 2005 7:00 AM, Blogger Sray said...
There is a general order, but there is quite a bit of chaos too!! That is what makes it all so interesting :):).
 
At June 01, 2005 7:19 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've just been reading about this somewhere else.

There's something deeply enigmatic and satisfying about seeing a picture of an object that is so massive that it's dimensions defy comprehension.

Truly amazing...
 
At June 01, 2005 8:17 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: Just imagine that that galaxy contains a 100 Billion stars.. 100s of millions of which are like our Sun... perhaps there is some other intelligent species around one of those Suns, peering through its telescope... looking at our Milky Way....
 
At June 01, 2005 8:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Vijay: The stars will mostly pass through empty space. But the collision will accelerate and pressurize the interstellar gases, which will then clump/collide and new nebulae (star-forming regions) will be created. And of course, there might be increased meteorite activities... but the human species will be long dead or evolved to something totally alien and hopefully, wonderful...
 
At June 01, 2005 11:49 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
I cann see your page correctly:(
 
At June 01, 2005 11:53 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Be Freshhhhh:D
 
At June 01, 2005 11:56 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Andromedan news story : "asd kaf sdgfgsd weughtjy dfhghdfj ng dfuogydfg fghfgh"

Sorry! No trans-galactic transalator available!
 
At June 01, 2005 11:59 AM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL, Atheist :):):).
 
At June 01, 2005 12:00 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Do we have to recalculate our distance to it? Coz if we should... then the Hubble constant will have to change.... and all the drama on the hubble constant will have to be re-enacted!
 
At June 01, 2005 12:07 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
A question totally different from the topic at hand... but i thought u were the only one i know who could help me!

Have u noticed that at one end of ur monitor's data cable, there's a slight cylindrical extra bulge on the wire. I see that in many recording equipments as well. A friend of mine dissected it and says that there is a cylindrical piece of ferrite coaxial to the cable there.

I wanna know the purpose of the casing... Since I dunno what its called... googling wasnt a good idea.. Initially i thought that it was something to shield noise. But... to shield noise, all u need is a cheap metal coating acting like a faraday cage, and moreover, it had to cover the entire cable and not just at one end.

Hope u dont mind me posting comments irrelevant to the post!
 
At June 01, 2005 6:53 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: The distance to it already known by measuring the apparent luminosities of certain Cepheid stars. The Hubble constant wont help, as the Andromeda is under the influence of the gravity of the Milky Way galaxy. The Doppler effect technique (Hubble) works only if there is no (or negligible) forces between the galaxies, which is true for galaxies which are really far apart (billions of light years).
 
At June 01, 2005 6:54 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna: Why crying, dear? >:D< >:D<
 
At June 01, 2005 6:59 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: I dont mind at all :):). These bulges are for reducing interference. What they do is stop the RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) from the computer to travel beyong the bulge. When I was in undergrad, we did experiments on RFI with/without the bulges, and the differences were quite measurable:D. You can find more info here!
 
At June 01, 2005 7:01 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Atheist: I think it serves a dual purpose. But normally, if you dont want them to snap off, you will have something like a intermediate connector, which would take all the load and separate if there is a lot of tension in the wire. Alternatively, for twisted-pair cables, you will find a knot in the cable which would take the load in case someone pulls it really hard.
 
At June 02, 2005 8:23 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Wow! Thanks! But wouldnt just a thin metal coating shield it? Why ferrite? And shouldnt it cover the entire cable if it were to be helpful?
 
At June 02, 2005 8:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The entire cable need not be covered! Remember that the goal is to stop the RFI to travel from the computer to other devices "along" the cable. So if you could stop it at the bulge, inches away from the computer, that is sufficient!
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, May 29, 2005
This Day:

The invention of the electric light-bulb was a watershed event in human history. Since then, we have been using electric sources of light in our homes, offices, roads, and cars. However, electric lights are often bulky, produce a lot of heat, and do not last long. Over the last 40 years or so, tremendous progress has been made in solid-state devices, which include semiconductor-based microprocessor chips, sensors and Light-Emitting-Diodes (LEDs).
Scientists have long been working on boosting the light output of the LEDs, so that they can work as replacements for the more traditional incandescent light-bulbs. Finally, their work is slowly beginning to bear fruit :):).

Let there be (Solid-State) Light! (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
In an article published in the journal Science, the researchers E. Fred Schubert and Jong Kyu Kim of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute describe research currently under way to transform lighting into smart lighting, with benefits expected in such diverse fields as medicine, transportation, communications, imaging, and agriculture.
The applications include the ability to control basic light properties — including spectral power distribution, polarization, and color temperature — will allow smart light sources to adjust to specific environments and requirements and to undertake entirely new functions that are not possible with incandescent or fluorescent lighting.
There will be a lot of power savings: solid-state sources potentially could cut in half the 22 percent of electricity now consumed by lighting. Traffic lights using LEDs, for example, use only one-tenth the power of signals using incandescent lamps.
Other applications include automatic modification of light frequency, modulation and intensity to match the human circadian rhythm, light-based communication between cars on the road so as to minimize chances of collisions, better optical transmission lines, and improved resolution in microscopes.

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At May 30, 2005 6:50 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Good news !
Seems they are doing something to help the environment
 
At May 30, 2005 9:47 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
"The applications include the ability to control basic light properties — including spectral power distribution, polarization,...."

Apart from using in experiments with light, will polarized light be of any use?

The LED revolution hasn't yet come to India. I have been waiting for those LED flashlights and bulbs. Probably I should make some and get rich! :)
 
At May 30, 2005 10:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: Yes. Power savings should be great. Also, since LEDs would generate less heat, we should have less need to use air-conditioners :).

Vijay: Once this tech matures, there will be many more applications of it.. a lot many that we cant even dream of!

Lucia: Hopefully, yes. But we also have to remember that this is a very small step when it comes to environment.

Sudhir: Polarization has uses in controlling the amount of light that can get in through a window, for example. Imagine that you have a window that allows light with horizontal polarization, but blocks those with vertical. At night, you can then use (vertical) polarized light indoors, so that people from outside cannot see inside your house, but you can still see the outside!
 
At May 31, 2005 10:55 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Where is sb?!u know?!:D
 
At May 31, 2005 7:33 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Who is sb? I dont know! Tell me ;).
 
At June 01, 2005 12:09 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Wow! That was COOL! Wow! Thats a remarkable application... and sometimes very necessary!
 
At June 01, 2005 7:08 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir and Gindy: Solid-State devices have really nice applications :). In another decade or two, we will only have solid-state lights, and nothing else! They are superior in every way, power-savings, less heat and more light, and higher luminosity.
 

Post a Comment