Saturday, May 28, 2005
This Day:

Ever since humans have started planting seeds and harvesting crops, they have unconsciously been selecting some traits of the plants over other traits. This selection process involved nothing more than rejecting the crops that were not suitable for consumption, or had low yield, and using those which were good/easy to eat, and easy to harvest. Over thousands of years, this process has helped domesticate a number of plants, which cannot survive in the wild today and are totally dependent on our abilities as harvesters for their survival.

Corn: Past and Present (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
One prime example is the corn (or maize) plant. Corn has been one of the primary crops since antiquity. The North American corn is a direct descendant of a grass called Teosinte, which is found in Mexico, Guatemala and Nicaragua. Researchers have now identified corn genes that were preferentially selected by Native Americans during the course of the plant's domestication.
The corn was domesticated about 6,000 years ago. Out of its 59,000 genes, about 1,200 were preferentially selected during this domestication process. The domesticated corn lost the ability to survive in the wild, produced larger and softer yields, and survived much longer:).
The study was published by University of California, Irvine's Brandon Gaut and his colleagues in the journal Science. Gaut and his coworkers used relatively new genomic techniques to determine the DNA sequence of 700 gene bits in the two plants (modern corn, and ancstral Teosinte) and used population genetics, the study of genetic variation, to compare them.
According to the scientists, the will provide important insights to modern corn breeders in their quest to establish hardier, higher-yielding corn plants. The scientific approach will also be useful in the study of other domesticated organisms, plants and animals alike, and will help us understand the natural processes by which plants and animals were once domesticated by our ancestors:).

(Hide) (Show)

12 Comments:

At May 29, 2005 4:57 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Very interesting. I heard similar process happened to potatoes - the Andes first ones were poisonous.
 
At May 29, 2005 7:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yes! Similar stories for wheat too... the wild ones have very low yield. Just imagine how hard it was for the first farmers :)).
 
At May 29, 2005 10:09 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
I guess thats why bananas still produce fruits, even though they are non-reproductive! I guess, only the ornamental and fruit-yielding ones survived, coz only these would be cultivated by humans! - "Evolution of species by artificial selection"
 
At May 30, 2005 4:01 AM, Blogger Akruti said...
Good old corn,and u gave the sceintific info on that too:( That corn which i love to eat while walking in the rain along with friends:) in hindi we call it "butta" and my mom says that when she was a kid the major crop used to be corn,they used to boil the corn kernals{dont scold me abt the spellings now:(
for many years it used to be the main diet in the offseason for farmers.
and now the scientific part of it,thanx for the info,but it sure makes me roll my eyes,and say "GOOD OLD CORN,I LOVE U THE WAY U R,WITH OR WITH SCIETIFIC INFO" Bhuhahahaha
 
At May 30, 2005 6:22 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: Ya... and many other plants too :). To a certain extent, animals do this too.. they eat what they like, and spread those seeds around. So this whole thing is like a weak symbiotic relationship.
 
At May 30, 2005 6:28 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Neelima: There is science in everything :). I ate bhutta too when I was young (and still do!), and corn is still the major crop in South America. Some more info on corn is here. Dont worry, it is not the scientific type. For that, you can go here :D:D:D.
 
At May 30, 2005 2:00 PM, Blogger Sray said...
USA is the largest producer of corn, but India (as one of the exporters of corn) is not far behind. It is not the staple diet (which includes rice, wheat and pulses), but people do eat it. The most common form of consumption is by frying the cornstalk on a fire, and eating it directly :). Other uses include corn-oil, and dried and powdered corn used as a flour.
 
At May 30, 2005 6:55 PM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Chapatis are a good example how corn is used in Indian cuisine: they can be made with chick-pea flour or corn flour !
And it's delicious
 
At May 31, 2005 7:35 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucia: Yesss! I forgot chapattis :):).

Atheist: Yes it is. We humans have always done domestication, and this is the sort of micro-evolution that even the most dogmatic of people would understand. Then combine a string of these micro-evolutions, and you have the macro-evolution/speciation that we have been having for millions of years on this planet!!
 
At June 01, 2005 7:12 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Atheist: I admit, I was speaking in loose terms there. But, to me, one differentiation could be this: the evolution is micro, if the species can still interbreed. Once they cannot, we can say that a speciation has occurred, and then term it as a macro-evolution. I know they are not the correct definitions, but there is a dividing line between the two sides.
 
At June 01, 2005 7:15 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: People do not eat the full stalk, but the fried corn directly from the stalk:):). Abt. if corn is native to India, I wasnt sure so I googled it, and this is what I found.


The conquering Spaniards introduced new agricultural techniques and species into Mesoamerica, just as they also introduced Mesoamerican species to Europe. Many Mesoamerican crops were introduced into Europe as novelties and curiosities, but maize spread quickly wherever Spaniards traveled, in large part because of its broad adaptability and high productivity. Though Spaniards themselves tended to regard maize as an inferior grain that produced coarse food stuffs best suited for animal consumption, many peoples contacted by the Spaniards (and Portuguese) in their expanding global trade routes quickly adopted it as a source of human food. In such a way maize quickly penetrated Africa, India and China during the 16th century.
 
At June 01, 2005 7:16 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Interestingly enough, potatoes, coffee and chocolate spread into the rest of the world through that route too!
 

Post a Comment

Friday, May 27, 2005
This Day:

Atoms are the fundamental building blocks in chemistry. An atom is composed of a positively charged core called the nucleus (consisting of protons and neutrons), surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged particle(s) called the electrons. The electrons are the prime movers in electricity (where the negatively charged particles travel from the negative to the positive electrode, thus transferring energy), and in electronics (where the flow of electrons or other electrically charged particles is controlled in devices such as semiconductors).

Electron Spin (Courtesy: Prentice-Hall)
The electric charge is a fundamental property of particles such as protons or electrons, and is the driver of Electromagnetism. All of our electrical and electronic devices operate on the electrical charge. However, a new concept based on the spin of an electron, is all set to revolutionize the industry.
The spin is a fundamental property associated with sub-atomic particles. Essentially, it is a fixed angular momentum (similar to rotation in our everyday world, but there is no equivalent in sub-atomic physics) intrinsic to the particle. An electron can have a spin of ±h/4 (where h is the Planck's constant, and = 3.1415...). Since an electron can have only two (up or down) spin values, the spin can be used as the basis of a binary system, where say, '0' = up spin, and '1' = down spin.
However, unlike the electric charge, it is very hard to control or manipulate the spin of an electron. This has hampered the development of any device based on the spin of the electron, until now. Physicists in Europe, California and at Ohio University now have found a way to manipulate the spin of an electron with a jolt of voltage from a battery, according to research findings published in the recent issue of the journal Physical Review Letters:):).
In this study, scientists applied voltage to the electron in a quantum dot, which is a tiny, nanometer-sized semiconductor. The burst of power changed the direction of the electron's spin - which can move either up or down. The time taken for such manipulation is about 1 to 20 nanoseconds (corresponding to a frequency of 1GHz), but scientists are confident that this time can be decreased further.
When such a fast switching between up and down spin is possible, it should give rise to new devices based on the spins of single electrons. For example, one could have memories where each bit is stored in the spin of a trapped electron, whereas in today's memories, the bit is represented by the collective charge of millions of electrons:D. These spintronic devices would be 1000 fold smaller than their electronic counterparts, consume less energy, and lead to quantum and optical computers.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At May 28, 2005 10:20 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
There is the 21cm line of hydrogen spectrum, corresponding to transition b/w spin states. Isnt it enough to provide radiation of the corresponding wavelength for it?
 
At May 28, 2005 10:21 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Oops! realized! u cant focus the radiation on a quantum dot! due to diffractio! especially when u want it to bea a part of Quantum computers
 
At May 28, 2005 10:25 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Exactly :). The wavelength is larger than the size of the quantum dot.. so that wont work :).
 
At May 28, 2005 10:25 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hey...... How do they manage to keep it in the higher energy spin state? Isnt that essential for 'storing' the bit. It cant work on probability that a state is filled, like we all do in Q Mech.... or can you? However, one state is biased over the other!
 
At May 28, 2005 10:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Well, the spin angular momentum must be conserved... so if they can keep the electron isolated (trapped inside the dot), then there is no way it can switch to the lower energy state... but of course, the electron has a finite probability of escaping the dot due to tunnelling...
 
At May 28, 2005 10:30 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Also, the splitting of energies in the spin states happens in Hydrogen atom due to an interaction with the nuclear spin. In our case, I dont think that will be the case... but of course there coult be some other nuclear (or otherwise) effect that might cause a split.
 
At May 28, 2005 10:44 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
There is interaction with nuclear spin wherever u see hyperfine splitting. I dont think inner electrons can shield the interaction.... can it?
 
At May 28, 2005 11:13 PM, Blogger Sray said...
There will be some shielding, I think. Also, the increased distance from the nucleus will reduce the energy gap. But... even if there is a split, it really does not affect the thrust of this (spintronic) research. It might be that one spin-state is slightly more stable than the other (depends on the temperature, and the energy gap).. but I dont think it would be enough to make the stored spin unstable, or cause the electron more likely to tunnel.
 
At May 28, 2005 11:46 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hmmmm. It could tunnel... Phew! So many things to take care of!
 
At May 31, 2005 9:04 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The sky is the limit, Atheist :):). We sure do live in interesting times :).
 
At June 01, 2005 7:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yes it is:). And so we are living that. On one hand, we have this beautiful technological advancements all over the spectrum... on the other hand, we have extreme levels of bigotry, hate, terrorism, and what not... :(:(.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, May 26, 2005
This Day:

The capacity of a removable storage disk has increased rapidly the last two decades. The old 5¼ floppy disks store 360 KB (1.2 MB if high density) of data. The later 3½ floppies store about 1.44 MB. The optical media such as CDs have a maximum capacity of 650 MB (74 minutes audio) to 800 MB (90 minutes audio). Most modern DVDs have a capacity of 4.7 GB. In 2003, Philips announced a dual-layer DVD with a capacity of 8.5 GB. And earlier this month, TDK announced a new 100 GB Blu-ray Disk Prototype.

Soon to be obsolete (Courtesy: Bit-Tech)
To top it all, now Toshiba has patented (US No. 6879556) a disk that could store 40 to 100 times more information that a conventional DVD, using more nanometre-scale sloped ridges to diffract light:). The technology, dubbed Articulated Optical Digital Versatile Disk (AO-DVD) could theoretically hold 800 GB :D:D.
Conventional DVDs store information in the form of ridges and depressions, each several hundred nanometres wide. These correspond to bits of binary data - '1's or '0's. The data is read from a disk by bouncing laser light off its surface and measuring the angle at which it reflects.
However, in Iomega's AO-DVD, sub-wavelength surface bumps would slope at slightly different angles - this could be used to encode up to 100 times more information!! Iomega claims the technique could improve data transfer rates by a factor of 30 as well.
Several other groups are also working on increasing the size of an optical disk. For example, a similar technology is being developed at Imperial College London, UK, which uses the polarity of reflected light, instead of its diffraction, to detect sub-wavelength slope features.
It remains to be seen which technique would finally offer the superior advantages to come out at the top. And by the way, a 1.5 TeraByte optical disk is in the pipeline, possibly to enter the market by the year 2010 :):).

(Hide) (Show)

5 Comments:

At May 28, 2005 3:44 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Can we have a re-writable DVD??:D
 
At May 28, 2005 6:32 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I'm not sure who the two main protagonists are any more.

On one side, you have the Blue Ray camp, and then there's the other format that's competing with it.

But I think the two sides have actually called a truce and are working together to make both formats work together, which is about time if you ask me.

Hopefully, if this accord can be cemented, then we may avoid this kind of problem in the future with other formats...
 
At May 28, 2005 7:25 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna... this DVD is not re-writable, yet, but I am sure it will soon be possible to do that as well! :)
 
At May 28, 2005 7:27 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: Exactly right. There is no point in having another format-war... it will waste money and time, confuse consumers to no end, and delay the pace of progress.
 
At May 28, 2005 4:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: Yaa! That is the job of research scientists :).

Vijay: That's really interesting. Hopefully the CD/DVDs are biodegradable then? The amount of such media that we are producing these days: it will really be very nice if they are!
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, May 25, 2005
This Day:

The Solar System today is a very stable place. Every planet has a well-defined, nearly circular orbit (except Pluto, which possibly is a planetoid anyway), maintaining a respectful distance from the neighboring planets. But according to a new computer simulation, it was not always like this.
The new simulation uses Chaos Theory to solve certain nagging problems about the formation of the Solar System. The research traces three seemingly unrelated phenomena - the giant planets' (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) orbits, craters on the Moon, and the behaviour of certain asteroids - to the motions of these giants nearly four billion years ago.

Solar System Salad:).. How many can you identify? (Courtesy: NASA)
The work answers the following important questions.
  • How did the intense bombardment of the Earth and the Moon start (3.9 billion years ago), that filled the Moon with large lava basins, and delayed the beginning of life on Earth?
  • Why did Jupiter and Saturn leave their circular orbits and take on the more oval paths seen today, and how did their orbits became so tilted compared to other planets?
  • Why does Jupiter share its orbit with thousands of asteroids that precede and follow it around the sun?
According to the researchers, who are publishing their work in three papers in Nature, the four gas giants originally formed in 10 million years within the current orbit of Uranus. Surrounding them in a ring were several thousand rocky objects called planetesimals, left over from the formation of the planets. Due to gravity, after 700 million years, Saturn had migrated outward and Jupiter inward to the extent that they reached a resonance point. This means they began to march in lockstep with each other, with Jupiter completing two orbits around the Sun for every one of Saturn's. The resonance allowed the pair to greatly disturb the orbits of the other planets :).
In the model, Jupiter and Saturn hurl Uranus and Neptune outwards like bowling balls into a sea of planetesimals, which scatter like pins. Asteroids are hurled inwards towards the smaller planets including the Earth, causing the so-called Late-Heavy-Bombardment (LHB) that rains meteorites on Earth and Moon. Samples of lunar rocks collected by astronauts had dated the impacts at about 650 million years after the formation of the Solar System. Some planetesimals bounce off Saturn's gravity, and get trapped in Jupiter's gravity well, and these (so-called) Trojans are still preceding and following Jupiter in its orbit :D.
This research is elegant, in that it ties together three seemingly disparate phenomena. More studies are needed, but it does seem that three problems have been solved in one master stroke :):).

(Hide) (Show)

10 Comments:

At May 27, 2005 6:04 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
Very good article !
 
At May 27, 2005 6:32 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks, Lucia :).
 
At May 27, 2005 1:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Interesting...!!! Very...
 
At May 27, 2005 9:10 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Oh1 So here's the chaos theory [art someone was askin for...

Hey noticed that ur blog has crossed 5000 hits. Congrats!
 
At May 28, 2005 1:13 AM, Blogger Sray said...
AC: Yes it is :). Sudhir: Thanks a lot... you noticed!!
 
At May 28, 2005 3:36 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Humm,Will the present situation be stable??What do u think?!
 
At May 28, 2005 3:37 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
By the way,Dalllllooooo:D:D:D
 
At May 28, 2005 7:18 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Dalllliestttt :D:D:D, The present config is stable. But there is always a chance of a rogue asteroid getting accelerated towards Earth :(:(.
 
At May 28, 2005 4:17 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hey Vijay, it is a really nice book, I have read it. Chaos is an integral part of our society (weather, migration, speciation, gas dynamics), and unless we are able to model it (which takes a lot of computing power), these non-perturbative systems will always be beyond our reach :(.
 
At May 28, 2005 10:07 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Hwy whatz with the Dalllooo and dalllliesttt
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, May 24, 2005
This Day:

Evolution is the ever-present change in traits of living creatures over generations, as they adapt to changing environments. According to this theory, as species adapt, different populations adapt to different local environments, and this leads to the gradual emergence of different species. This process is known as speciation. Walking back in time, almost all modern species therefore should be able to derive their ancestry from a single primordial ancestor. Traditionally, this job is done by paleontologists, who study history of life on Earth based on fossil record, and by taxonomists, who maintain and upgrade this hierarchy of extant and extinct species. This hierarchy is also known as the Tree Of Life.

Tree Of Life (Courtesy: TreeOfLife)
However, a more modern approach is to find the similarities between the genetic codes of several modern species, and then try to estimate their position on the tree. Since the genetic code runs into millions of base-pairs (the basic unit of DNA), this pattern matching is not trivial. Add in the possibility that there might be random mutations, duplicates, or inverted sequences, and the matching problem becomes a nightmare, which requires extensive computing power:(.
To that end, a new supercomputing cluster designed for the phylogenetic research community has been installed at the San Diego Supercomputer Center. The cluster has 128 Opteron processors each with 4 GB memory, and is supported with a grant from the National Science Foundation in support of the CyberInfrastructure for Phylogenetic Research project, a collaboration of biologists, computer scientists, statisticians and mathematicians at 19 institutions whose goal is to understand the evolutionary relationships between all living organisms.
According to the project leader Mark Miller, the goal is to reconstruct the tree of life for 100,000 species or more. In addition to finding the exact nature of the relationships between the species of the world, the project would also develop new algorithms and database approaches, that will have benefits to research related to data mining, protein decoding, and drug manufacturing:).

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At May 26, 2005 12:00 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Whoa! Thats a huuuuuuge task!
 
At May 26, 2005 12:27 PM, Blogger Sray said...
So it is!! And it requires huge processing power as well. I did a course on Protein Transcription here in graduate school, and i really appreciated the computing power it takes! And add to that the problem of determining protein folding, and it gets exponentially harder :(.
 
At May 26, 2005 4:14 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I dont think you can ever convince those who do not want to believe it. After all, how can you refute the mother of all illogic: that god made the earth to look like 4.6 billion years old, and planted fossils to confuse people?!
 
At May 26, 2005 5:05 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I Atheist .. hope you don't mind me calling you that?

I think I might have something that might be of interest to you.

Well worth a read.

While I'm not an atheist, I do question the tenuous grasp that most religions have of this wonderful world of ours...
 
At May 26, 2005 8:02 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: I have read that before, and it is wonderful. I am an atheist, in that I dont see the need of a god to start or continue the functions of this universe. Of course there are things we havent been able to explain yet, but I have full confidence that science will be able to explain them. After all, didnt science already explain so many things previously attributed to divine powers?
 
At May 26, 2005 8:05 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy: The goal is to compare both the genetic code of different organisms, and also to compare the proteins that these genes ultimately encode. Differences in our genes ultimately manifest themselves into different proteins, which then influence all that is different at the macro-level :).

The animal is a donkey... and looks quite a bit like me :D.
 
At May 27, 2005 8:10 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
I WAS an athieist, and now i'm what ppl call agnostic. With the amount of info we have, we cant say whether god exists or not. But, definitely, I do believe that there is no need of divine intervention to keep the world running. But, that doesnt necessarily imply that God doesnt exist! God is just like another theory.... only an old one. Science is another alternate theory, but a newer one, with newer observations and more data... and thus bound to be a better theory of explaining stuff.
 
At May 27, 2005 8:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thing is: I cannot reconcile a god (or some other divine being) with the scientific spirit. If there were to be a god, where did it come from? Who created it? So... either you have a infinite hierarchy of gods, or assume that god existed always, or that it was spontaneously created. None of them are in the true spirit of scientific endeavor.
 
At May 27, 2005 11:41 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
The greatest puzzle of them all is the same question be you religious of the inquiring scientist; what made the universe / gods?

But then, this question may in itself be flawed on the basis that asking such a question is entirely reliant on a linear concept of beginning and end, when it may be that the universe, or the container omniverse exists outside of, above and beyond this simpler framework that we humans are more familiar with.

Or I could be wrong.

In either case, I'm sure I've said all of that before somewhere else.

I repetitive of me!
 
At May 27, 2005 11:46 AM, Blogger Sray said...
The fundamental question is: Can there be a effect without a cause? If scientists can find a set of self-contained equations which necessitate a universe that must exist without anything that causes it to exist, then there is no need of a god. But if not, then the question becomes, where did god come from?
 
At May 27, 2005 9:18 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
agrees with Wayne. WE are limited by what we can percieve. The complete picture MAY require more than what we can percieve.

Considering all theories, with an intervening God or not,... of all of 'em science seems to be the best... as it enables us to predict nature, and moreover, its quantitative... a thing that the other DIVINE theories lack at.
 

Post a Comment

Monday, May 23, 2005
This Day:

The Voyager-1 is an unmanned probe launched on September 5, 1977, and is currently the most distant man-made object in the Solar System. It is currently about 90 AU (about 13.5 billion kms) away, and signal from it takes about 13 hours to reach Earth (in comparison, light from the Sun takes about 8 minutes to reach us). Scientists have long speculated about the eventual exit of the Voyager-1 from the Solar System, which would happen when the probe enters into the heliosheath, which is a vast, turbulent expanse where the Sun's influence ends and particles blown off its surface crash into the thin gas that drifts between the stars.

Voyager Graphic (Courtesy: JPL)
Now at last, it is happening: scientists at NASA have confirmed that the probe is currently in the heliosheath, and is fast on its way to interstellar space:):).
Scientists do not really know where the actual edge to interstellar space is. According to the current models, the solar wind (matter and radiation constantly blowing away from the Sun) should get weaker and weaker as we move away from the Sun, and at some distance would collide with the sparse gases found between stars. The region where this collision would occur, is known as the termination shock. At the termination shock, the solar wind slows abruptly from a speed that ranges from 1.1-2.4 million km/h and becomes denser and hotter. One of the final tasks of the Voyager probes is to locate the edge of this termination shock (called the heliopause), beyond which is the interstellar space.
The most persuasive evidence that Voyager-1 has crossed the termination shock is its measurement of a sudden increase in the strength of the magnetic field carried by the solar wind, combined with an inferred decrease in its speed. This happens when the solar wind slows down, and thus the density of charged particles from the Sun increase (imagine a slower traffic: the vehicles are bumper to bumper), with a corresponding increase in the magnetic field. This field strength increased by 1.7 times in November 2003, and again by 2.5 times in December 2004 (and is holding steady ever since). This indicates that the solar wind has perhaps reached a minimum speed, and we are soon to reach this elusive boundary of the Sun's dominion:):).

(Hide) (Show)

7 Comments:

At May 25, 2005 7:26 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I've just been reading about this.

The news was announced at some event and the attendees gave a standing ovation.

Quite remarkable...
 
At May 25, 2005 7:54 AM, Blogger Tupinambah said...
What a loooong trip!
 
At May 25, 2005 10:33 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
The time will come when passing through this region and beyond will be common-place.

I envy those who'll come after us...
 
At May 25, 2005 10:38 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa Lucia, it is a long trip.. soon the Voyager-II will also cross this threshold!

Wayne: Yaa :). Just as people of the past wrote they are envious of us :)). But that, sadly, is life.
 
At May 25, 2005 1:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Damn!! Why am I still here? ;-)
 
At May 25, 2005 5:45 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Vijay and AC: I would think it to be terribly wasteful, if out of billions of stars, only our Sun had a planet that could support life :). Abt. the articles... I write one story abt. a recent invention/discovery every day, so if there are some good ones that use chaos/perturbation theories, I will definitely write about them.
 
At May 26, 2005 8:28 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
And the nest star is still so far far away!
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, May 22, 2005
This Day:

The current definition of 1 second depends upon the accuracy of the Cesium133 atomic clock. An atomic clock uses the atomic resonance frequency (depends on the time it takes for an electron to jump from excited state to ground state in the outer layers of the atom) as its counter. Since this frequency is a function of the fundamental properties of the atom, it is extremely accurate (small fluctuations can and do exist, due to quantum fluctuations). The Cesium clock is accurate upto 1 part in 1015, and currently defines the second. However, this atomic clock is hard to stabilize, and this has imposed an inherent upper limit to the accuracy.

Vacuum Chamber to cool atoms using a laser (Courtesy: PhysicsWeb)

Now researchers in Japan have demonstrated a way to trap neutral atoms that could herald a new era in timekeeping. The team believes that an optical clock based on Strontium atoms trapped in an optical lattice could lead to clocks that are accurate to one part in 1018, and thus a 1000 fold better than the Cesium clocks:):).
The Japanese team first trapped a cloud of 10,000 Strontium atoms at a temperature of just 2 microkelvin in a one-dimensional optical lattice (a very narrow wire). A blue laser cools down the atoms to that temperature. When a light is shined upon the atoms, the atoms get trapped in the crests and troughs of the light wave! So by measuring the number of atoms in a fixed length of wire, the scientists can find the frequency of the light used, and thus set a new standard for the measurement of time:):).

(Hide) (Show)

16 Comments:

At May 24, 2005 3:49 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Dalllyyyyy:D
 
At May 24, 2005 4:17 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
New measurement?!:D:DSo say them to make time shorter than now!!!!!And Happy new photo here i havenn said congratulations here!and also i think these days i have heard a news that day by day the earth planet is becomin dark and dark,i mean the light is decreasin...
 
At May 24, 2005 5:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Dolllyyy:D:D, make time shorter?! :))... hmmm... happy photo? Looks very sad to me! Abt. the earth getting darker, the solar output goes up and down in a cycle. But the earth is getting brighter, as the atmosphere is cleaner now (than say 100 years ago), and also due to global warming, there is less ice on the earth, which normally would reflect a lot of the sunlight.
 
At May 24, 2005 12:12 PM, Blogger Onkroes said...
I sometimes wonder how people can think about doing this kind of thing - it's so obscure (I mean the how, not the why - I understand a desire to measure 'time' more accurately).

But I also wonder why? I mean, why does the difference between 10^15 to 10^18 matter? And what is it's practical application (coz we surely don't need that kind of accuracy in our normal lives).
 
At May 24, 2005 12:59 PM, Blogger wise donkey said...
Wow interesting:)

:( looks like i have lots of catchin up to do:( in the next 2 months:)

keep up the good work
Btw
http://o3.indiatimes.com/o3support do u think u will be interested in writing for them?
 
At May 24, 2005 12:59 PM, Blogger wise donkey said...
adore the new pic:d
 
At May 24, 2005 1:05 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
@onkroes: "coz we surely don't need that kind of accuracy in our normal lives"
That is why you dont have one in you basement!

It is needed to do experiments with short-duration time periods.

It will improve accuracy of GPSes which use time from atomic clocks for sychronisation calculations.

Moreover, there's the thrill factor in making the best in the business.

@Gindy: Its almost the same time every time. It does vary, but within a verry narrow range. All the hard work goes into reducing that range. However, nature prevents us from attaining infinite accuracy due to something called the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. (In this case, time-energy uncertainty)

@sray: Any particular reason for Strontium?
 
At May 24, 2005 1:39 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Onkroes and Gindy: I think Sudhir has answered your questions to a certain extent. The practical applications are in GPS, and in timing chemical reactions. For example, the chemical reactions occur at the time-scale of 10^-15 to 10^-18 seconds, and if we are able to time them accurately, it will be possible to fine-tune a lot of the theory, which ultimately helps in development of new proteins/drugs and also in genetic engineering applications.
 
At May 24, 2005 1:40 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sudhir: Wow, you are leading the pack in comments big time! Why Strontium? Strontium is already used in a atomic transition clock (here) though the performance was worse than the Cesium clock. Also, the transition frequency of Strontium didnt clash with the laser frequency being used here, and that was a plus too! But you are right, nothing theoretical really prevents them from using something else, so I have to check up a little bit more.
 
At May 24, 2005 1:42 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wise Donkey: So I am the new donkey on the block :D:D. Abt. catching up.. it should keep u busy for at least a week or so :))... thanks for the compliments :). I will check up your link and see what it is all about. BTW, when are you coming back to the blogdom?
 
At May 24, 2005 1:46 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Vijay, thanks for visiting! Yaa.. such fine-tuned clocks will also be able to measure relativistic anomalies that arise from the gravitational forces of smaller objects (say a mountain, etc.). Another application is in the possible detection of gravitational waves. A little more accuracy, and one might even envision gravitational detectors for navigation in total darkness (a perfect stealth for military).
 
At May 26, 2005 12:12 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Whoa! Indeed! I'm the leading commenter! Well, u cant blame me! U have such an addictive blog. Previously In used to go to slashdot for my daily science update. But u give a better summary and a pic top accompany it, that i've almost dumped slashdot. And guess what... many of the mails i forward... are ur blogposts, and stuff that i grab from the links therein.

Noticed it recently that u have a comment counter, and that I'm on top in it.

Wow! Analyzing chemical reactions! Thats interesting! Never ever thought that they could be used for that!
 
At May 26, 2005 12:25 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Heyy Sudhir :)... thanks a lot for your compliments :). When I started the blog, I never thought I will get such dedicated readers! But now I think I can start charging you for reading my blog then, eh?! ;););)
 
At May 27, 2005 8:15 AM, Blogger Unknown said...
Slashdot doesnt charge me!
 
At May 28, 2005 2:06 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Ok Sudhir... then you can pay me... by writing more comments :D:D:D.
 
At May 28, 2005 10:30 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
lol... fine! If thats the currency here!
 

Post a Comment