Saturday, April 02, 2005
This Day:

The climatic changes on Earth are mostly driven by the oceanic currents. These currents tend to confine themselves to either sides of the Equator. When waters from North and South meet at the Equator, they combine lazily and create an utter lack of wind known as the doldrums.
However, a new study (published in the journal Science) finds certain connections between the climates in the two hemispheres in the long run. According to researchers from Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona in Spain and the Cardiff University in the UK, ocean circulations in the Southern hemisphere have adapted to sudden changes in the North.

Great Ocean Conveyor Belt (Courtesy: NASA)
Interestingly enough, the researchers found that several times in history, an increase in the temperature in the Northern hemisphere precipitated a cooling period in the South. Conversely, a cooler Northern hemisphere resulted in a warmer Southern hemisphere! Computer models have predicted this behavior, but this is the first time this has been discovered in the weather records.
The cause seems to be linked to how the oceanic streams transport heat from one part of the ocean to another. For example, the climate of the Northern Atlantics is greatly influenced by the warm waters carried by the Gulf stream (from the Gulf of Mexico). But the strength of this stream depends on the salinity of the southbound water; if salinity decreases, the current weakens.
From time to time, a melting of the Greenland ice-sheets would introduce fresh water into the Northern Atlantic, thus reducing the salinity of the Northern ocean. This in turn would weaken the gulf-stream, thus slowing the heat transport from the Southern hemisphere. Therefore, as the North cools, the South warms up.
Conversely, when a warmer and more saline North (due to more evaporation of sea-water) keeps the gulf stream strong, it results in more heat transfer from the South (and thereby cooling it). As the North heats up, the melting of Greenland ice slowly cools the North, and the cycle starts all over again.

(Hide) (Show)

8 Comments:

At April 03, 2005 1:19 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
thats interesting post :)

But is there a Greenland equivalent in South ? Would some from Antartica melt and therefore decrease salinity and cause the reverse ? or does it mainly depend on the northern hemisphere changes?
 
At April 03, 2005 6:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
The two hemispheres are not symmetric. If you look at the picture, you will see that the cold stream is mostly to the south. This is due to the the fact that we have a large, open ocean in our Southern hemisphere. So, it will take a lot of melting and moving of continents to turn the whole thing around! So yes, it is mostly the melting in the North that controls the salinity.
 
At April 03, 2005 10:58 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
The structure and the layout of the continents clearly plays an important role in all of this.

But in reading how one hemisphere compensates for the other, this all sounds very self-regulatory, doesn't it?
 
At April 03, 2005 1:22 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sure does. Over millions of years, the climate has slowly settled down into a stable state, and it might be hard to drastically change it. But once it does change, there is no knowing what the next stable state might be!
 
At April 03, 2005 2:25 PM, Blogger wise donkey said...
thanks for clarifying:)
guess i should have thought of the size of ocean in the southern
 
At April 03, 2005 4:25 PM, Blogger Sray said...
No problem, Wise Donkey :-).

Gindy: Climates change all the time. But the changes normally take thousands of years, which allows the living world to slowly adapt. If the changes are too quick (say within a few decades), there might be chaos.
 
At April 04, 2005 4:45 PM, Blogger Sray said...
As climates change, fishes move to newer areas. But the current problem might be due to overfishing, and not due to any migration, I think.
 
At April 05, 2005 3:42 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Agreed. But did the fish move to warmer regions, or just die en masse?
 

Post a Comment

Friday, April 01, 2005
This Day:

Today's post is not about any new innovation/advancement, but a sad statement on the way science is being short-changed in the United States. The Hubble telescope has been the diamond in the crown of modern space explorations. Launched in 1990 by the space shuttle Discovery, Hubble has performed with near precision (notwithstanding some major and minor repairs) for nearly 15 years now. Hubble could still go on for several years (with some repairs), but soon this crowning achievement will be fitted with rockets, which will bring it crashing down into the Pacific Ocean.

Hubble Space Telescope (Courtesy: NASA)
A major review last week of servicing the Hubble Space Telescope has led NASA officials to a deorbit only position. Backed (perhaps unsurprisingly) by the White House, the tele-robotic mission (that would have used a robot/robotic arm to fix the gyroscopes and do some other maintenance) has been scrapped. After the Columbia disaster, a manned mission was scrapped as well, supposedly on safety grounds, despite the astronauts' statements that are perfectly willing to take the risk.
So how healthy is Hubble now? As I mentioned in one of my previous posts, Hubble currently has three working gyroscopes, and scientists have managed to make it work even on two, which might allow Hubble function until 2008. The batteries might fail by 2010. So, we can expect another (at the most) 2-3 good years from Hubble. So start writing your obituaries now :(:(.
On a lighter note, this is my 60th post (Diamond Jubilee!). Somehow, writing about this diamond in the sky seemed strangely appropriate.

(Hide) (Show)

13 Comments:

At April 02, 2005 6:53 AM, Blogger KL said...
You scored your half-century on March 22. What! You took almost 10 days to add 10 more runs to your score!!!!! Geee...you are worst than Sunil Gavaskar
 
At April 02, 2005 6:54 AM, Blogger Sray said...
How do you know these are runs?! These might be centuries ;-):-D.
 
At April 02, 2005 7:00 AM, Blogger KL said...
Huh! these are centuries!! What are you trying to say that you've so far scored 60 centuries in all your 1-day games???? I wonder why do they give all those wisden and other prizes to Tendulkar, Dravid, Waugh, etc!!!!!
 
At April 02, 2005 7:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Actually, each of my posts have 200-300 words, so these are double/triple centuries :-D:-D.

Ah... there no appreciation for talent these days...
 
At April 02, 2005 7:07 AM, Blogger KL said...
Ah! who can appreciate talent when such scores are made while playing against some nerds (Einstein et al..) who would all rather immerse themselves in solving problems than playing cricket....and some inanimate objects

Try to achiever similar feet while playing against some big shots.
 
At April 02, 2005 8:39 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
This saddens me about Hubble, from a strictly poetic eye on the universe. The pictures that it has gifted us with have amazed and awed my soul. It has added fuel to my dreams and opened my mind to ever greater possiblities than I had thought possible.
 
At April 02, 2005 8:47 AM, Blogger Sray said...
True. And it is not only about pictures.. the science that has come out of Hubble has been truly breathtaking. It has revolutionized our view of the universe, and our position in it.
 
At April 02, 2005 10:31 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
That's actually a good point from Broomhilda.

Even if there was no scientific merit to keeping Hubble out of trouble (OK, sorry .. but I just had to, right?) the pictures alone and the value they bring are worth keeping Hubble running.

Very sad, but also very politically motivated...
 
At April 02, 2005 11:05 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Very political. You spend $200 billion in Iraq, and there isnt few millions for a Hubble repair? Hmmph!
 
At April 02, 2005 4:19 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yeah, the Deep Impact mission... but seriously, Hubble has/will produce more science any day. NASA is supposed to put another telescope (James Webb Space Telescope) in orbit in the next decade to replace Hubble, but I am not at all confident :-(.
 
At April 03, 2005 1:29 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
Congrats on the diamond jubilee:) Looking forward more:)

I still dont understand the logic of the decision.

Hmmm perhaps, if hubble sights some green men somewhere who will be threat to white house,
or if some other country starts a race, to win it,

the focus will shift to space :(
 
At April 03, 2005 6:38 AM, Blogger Sray said...
India and China (and EU) are pumping up their space exploration missions. USA is giving them time to catch up... it is such a decent opponent, dont you think? ;-).
 
At April 03, 2005 4:29 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy, I am really troubled by the lack of initiative by the political leaders. Why cant we all get together and find a way to save Hubble? If USA could have gone to the moon in 1960s (wonder if NASA was this concerned over safety then!), surely a little effort can be made to save Hubble?

Space exploration is inherently risky. Of course no one will die in space if you never attempt to go to space. That seems like NASA's goal now.
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, March 31, 2005
This Day:

US researchers from Stanford University have developed a bionic eye, which has been successfully tested in rats. According to the research team, the eye implant - a 3-millimetre-wide chip that would fit behind the retina - could be a dramatic step above currently available technology.

Bionic Eye System (Courtesy: Stanford University)
Published in the Journal of Neural Engineering, the system is a retinal prosthesis system that can stimulate the retina with resolution corresponding to a visual acuity of 20/80—sharp enough to orient yourself toward objects, recognize faces, read large fonts, watch TV and, perhaps most important, lead an independent life. The researchers tested the system in rats, but human trials are at least 3 years away.
Degenerative retinal diseases (such as age-related macular degeneration) is caused in 700,000 people each year in the USA alone. In such a disease, the rod-shaped photoreceptors at the retina's periphery (responsible for night vision), and cone-shaped cells (color vision) are damaged. However, the retina is still intact, and if it could be directly stimulated, some functionalities could be restored.
The complete setup includes a small chip implanted directly onto the eye, a wearable computer, a video camera, and a pair of infra-red goggles. First, light from (say) a flower enters the video camera. The video camera then sends the image of the flower to the wallet-sized computer for complex processing. The processor then wirelessly sends its image of the flower to an infrared LED-LCD screen mounted on the goggles. The transparent goggles reflect an infrared image into the eye and onto the retinal chip. The chip converts the image to the visual range, and projects it onto the retina.
This design employs a pixel density of up to 2,500 pixels per millimeter, corresponding to a visual acuity of 20/80, which could provide functional vision for reading books and using the computer. This is significantly better than the currently existing technologies, which provide only a few pixels per millimeter. The work is a synergy of diverse fields: biology, electronics, physics, and signal processing.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At March 31, 2005 10:24 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yeah I know :-(. I was wondering if we could do these kinds of research without using animals.
 
At April 01, 2005 4:47 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"The researchers tested the system in rats, but human trials are at least 3 years away."

I don't understand why human trial can't start earlier - there would surely be no shortage of volunteers. I understand why there would be rules for general release of drugs to the unsuspecting public, but if people volunteer to do the testing then surely there's no issue!
 
At April 01, 2005 5:26 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I think the researchers have to show that it is not dangerous (toxicity studies etc.) and then file those results with the FDA, and only then the trials can start.
 
At April 01, 2005 3:23 PM, Blogger Onkroes said...
Yeah, I can understand that, but if a volunteer knows the risks (as long as the producer of the treatment declares them), then surely that is a person's right to do? I for one wouldn't mind being experimented on if it could restore my lost sight, or enable me to have two useful arms or legs again. It seems to me the FDA is trying to protect people against their will if you know what I mean. It smacks too much of nanny-ism - I think people should be allowed to take the risks they choose to try to get the benefits (just like a gambler has the right to gamble all his money for a high stakes win, possibly - but surely it should be his/her right).

The other thing about the FDA holding back drugs where it feels they aren't proven, is that people who could be alive because of the treatments, may otherwise die. For example if an effective cancer cure was created right now, it would be 5-7 years before it would be allowed to come to the market. If I was dying of cancer with a month to live, I'd say "stuff the regulation, just give me the drug, I'll take that risk".

Sorry, I didn't mean for this to turn into a rant about the nanny state. I used to read Scientific American for my science updates - I'm thinking about cancelling my subscription and just reading your blog instead ;-)
 
At April 02, 2005 1:27 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
Thats really interesting post.

I havent yet understood the technical part, but it would be amazing and so wonderful for the people who would benefit.
 
At April 02, 2005 1:33 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
animal testing not for my cosmetic products but for medicines, well unless something else is not worked out, guess i agree with the current system.

yes a valid point re.terminally ill and medicines which are yet to be approved.. if the patient definitely has no chances and is absolutely aware of the risks and if there r rules to prevent it being misused, well why not:) after all every life saved, counts.
 
At April 02, 2005 5:29 AM, Blogger Sray said...
FDA allows fast-track human testing for life-saving drugs/treatment, e.g. for cancer/heart disease. Case in point: the artificial heart a couple of years ago. But blindness is not life-threatening, so I do not think FDA will take a chance. After all, a foreign body (a chip) inside the eye can cause infections which can be life-threatening! The researchers have to prove that the chip will not be hazardous to the patient in the long-term.

Computer models might replace experimentation to a certain extent. Researchers often model drugs on the computer, and some estimations of toxicity etc. can be done on the computer. But they still have to test the drugs on animals after all that.

My biggest problem with animal testing is not that animals are used, but that they are often kept in really poor conditions, in small cages, for day after day. And once their utility is finished, they are thrown away like a piece of shit.

Wise donkey: Even though I hate it, I really dont see a way around animal testing in some cases. I guess we shoukd make laws that restrict animals testings only for life-threatening diseases. But these days, they do such testing for cosmetics and soap and detergents, which is pathetic :-(.
 
At April 02, 2005 7:00 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Oh Onkroes, thanks for the compliment :-D.. perhaps you can pay me instead ;-);-).
 
At April 03, 2005 1:34 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
sray agree with u on animal testing:)
 
At April 06, 2005 7:23 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
You might want to read this...
 
At April 06, 2005 7:35 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Interesting, thanks! Perhaps the chip is planted on some pathway which gets excited, thus leading to better vision?
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, March 30, 2005
This Day:

Gravitropism is the movement of a plant based on the strength and direction of gravity. For example, when a seed sprouts, the roots always grow down into the soil, whereas the stem grows upward. A germinating seed can be turned upside down several times and the root will still start to bend downwards. A team of biologists from the University of California, Riverside has used chemical genomics to identify novel compounds that affect this ability of plants to alter their direction of growth in response to gravity.

Tonoplast aggregrates (Courtesy: University of California, Riverside)
The team published its findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers analysed some 10,000 small molecules to identify those that could positively or negatively affect gravity’s effect on plant growth, which is closely linked to the movement of proteins through plant cell membranes.
The work focusses on using these molecules to disrupt, or reorient the growth of the plant in any particular direction. This is easier to do than other approaches, which use genetic mutations to alter the plant behavior. The team narrowed their search down to 4 chemicals, which affected gravitropism and the movement of proteins through membranes within the plant cell. The chemicals affect the growth of tonoplasts (membrane surrounding the vacuole), and this indirectly regulates the direction in which a plant will grow.
This research was supported by NASA, and will have applications such as growing plants in space. If successful, this would allow astronauts to grow their own food, and also regenerate the oxygen during long space missions.

(Hide) (Show)

6 Comments:

At March 31, 2005 1:20 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I did see the movie... lovely isnt it? The effects are a bit old-fashioned, but hey! it is a old movie :-).

Low/Zero gravity plant growth can also help in growing (ahem!) carrots on Mars... but wouldnt it be hard to spot the carrots there, Mars being red and all? :-D:-D.
 
At March 31, 2005 2:58 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Ah, but Mars is so dark (farther from the Sun), orange and red look alike :-). And green stuff will look black in red light!
 
At March 31, 2005 6:44 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Well the obvious question is, are plants actually sensing the tension of gravitons?
 
At March 31, 2005 6:51 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hmmm... Ask Lucretia ;-).
 
At March 31, 2005 3:06 PM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
I tend to wear loose cotton clothing, so mine are fine...
 
At April 02, 2005 1:44 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting :)
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, March 29, 2005
This Day:

Anyone who has used a battery-powered device knows how annoying it is to sit and wait for it to recharge. Now Toshiba has come up with a novel Lithium-Ion battery that recharges 80% of a battery's energy capacity in only one minute. This is about 60 times faster than the typical Lithium-Ion battery in use today :).

The new battery employs latest advances in nano-material technology, which allows the negative electrode to use new nano-particles to prevent organic liquid electrolytes from reducing during battery recharging. The nano-particles quickly absorb and store vast amount of lithium ions, without causing any deterioration in the electrode.
The battery also has a long life-cycle (loses only 1% of capacity after 1,000 cycles of discharging and recharging), and can operate at very low temperatures (-40° C). Other advantages include: very small and light (3.8mm thick, 62mm high and 35mm deep), and eco-friendly (less energy wasted in recharging). The battery also has a very high energy density of 600mAh (Milli-Ampere Hour).
Toshiba will bring this battery into commercial production by 2006. The first users would be in the automotive and industrial sectors, where the slim, small-sized battery will deliver large amounts of energy while requiring only a minute to recharge. The size, weight and safety will make it ideal for hybrid vehicles.
There is no info about when it will be ready for laptops, so keep carrying all those heavy laptops for now :).

(Hide) (Show)

9 Comments:

At March 30, 2005 1:51 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
Thats interestin :) and the price??
 
At March 30, 2005 2:02 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It will be released in 2006, so the price is not set yet.
 
At March 30, 2005 5:00 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:((The fact that the time when it can be used in laptops is not clear is really a bad news for me:D
Seems I have to strengthen myself for long time!!'N the other case,will it suits all marks or only Toshiba products can use this innovation?I mean if I have a Sony made instrument can I use this battery for that??
 
At March 30, 2005 6:12 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Bang goes my tech' news In Brief story for tomorrow...

:-\

[Humph!]
 
At March 30, 2005 8:52 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna... soon you will strong as a weightlifter :D:D.

I think it should be compatible with all laptops (once it comes out). Otherwise, Toshiba wont make much money! Also, these things follow a standard, and toshiba will not make a non-standard battery since it will then not fit old toshiba laptops/devices.
 
At March 30, 2005 8:53 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: I am really sorry... were you really planning to write about it tomorrow? :-(:-(:-(.
 
At March 30, 2005 9:26 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
"... Were you really planning to write about it tomorrow?"

Yes!
 
At March 30, 2005 10:41 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia once wrote abt. an item I was had already partially written on... so you see, you are not alone :-D.
 
At March 30, 2005 12:45 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Sadly, you have to wait.. at least till 2006!
 

Post a Comment

Monday, March 28, 2005
This Day:

Scientists normally estimate the age of a rocky planet like Mars by counting the number, size and distribution pattern of craters on its surface. The idea: the older a surface, the more craters should have accumulated over time. Crater counts thus give an indication of the relative age of different Martian regions. Scientists would then compare the crater counts with similar regions on the moon, which have already been exactly dated by using the rocks from the moon, and thus arrive at an exact date for the martian regions.
However, it looks like this method of computing the age of different Martian regions is flawed.

A typical Martian crater (Courtesy: NASA)
According to Nadine Barlow of Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, USA, pictures from NASA's Mars Explorer spacecraft detected faint ray-like lines emanating from even the smallest of craters. This suggests that a lot of debris went up in the air when the meteorite hit the surface, and that falling debris must have caused a lot of secondary craters in the region. This would mean that the way crater-counting is done is flawed, since the current methods would have counted the secondary craters as craters from meteorite impacts. This would skew the result, and the region would seem to be much older than it actually is.
The findings will significantly change our estimations on when different regions of Mars were volcanically active. The vast majority of craters smaller than 2 kilometres in diameter may be secondary craters, making them virtually useless for dating surfaces. Therefore, all estimations that are based on craters, have to be revisited. This will have implications for our understanding of the evolution of Mars, when water last existed on Mars, and consequently, our understanding of why it disappeared and when life might have formed there or gone extinct.

(Hide) (Show)

4 Comments:

At March 29, 2005 6:24 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Well they better damn well get on with sorting out the dates, then!

Tsk, tsk, tsk!

There's a moral to this: never ask a scientist for the time...

;-p
 
At March 29, 2005 9:24 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Easier said than done, Wayne...

that said, you can trust the scientists to admit they are wrong when they are wrong...
 
At March 29, 2005 5:03 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Gindy, they did know of this. But since the ray-like lines were not seen before, they assumed not much debris went up!
 
At March 30, 2005 12:54 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Keep commenting, while it lasts :-D:-D.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, March 27, 2005
This Day:

Carbon nanotubes are cylindrical chains composed purely of carbon atoms. Due to their unique structure, they exhibit unusual strength and unique electrical properties, and are efficient conductors of heat. The tubes have huge potential in the fields of nanotechnology, electronics and superconductivity, among others.
Now scientists at Sandia National Laboratories have demonstrated that organic nanotubes, married to an inorganic catalyst, can harness sunlight to turn water into pure hydrogen and oxygen.

Water molecules confined in a nanotube (Courtesy: AIP)
Such organic nanotubes are already in use in nature. For example, our blood uses porphyrin nanotubes, which provide the power by which hemoglobin forms new proteins. The Sandia researchers believe they can harness the same mechanism to power automobiles with water. In fact, their laboratory created tube mimics one naturally occuring tube called the chlorosome, which is found in some photosynthetic bacteria! One day, fuel cells composed of such nano-structures might be able to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels.
The researchers were able to synthetically create the nanotubes in an aqueous solution. The tube has two different regions for generating hydrogen and oxygen respectively, in the presence of sunlight. The two gases are emitted from the two sides of the tube, where they can be captured and stored separately.
The next step is to create an array of these tubes, so that it can act as a solar cell that will generate hydrogen and oxygen. The porphyrin nanotubes are similar in size to carbon nanotubes, measuring up to 1 micron long but only 50 to 70 nanometers in diameter, with walls just 20 nm thick. They self-assemble easily (in an aqueous solution, for example) and it is quite conceivable to easily and cheaply produce them en masse.
Further usages of such a device could be in the fields of electronics, photonics, and chemical sensors.

(Hide) (Show)

11 Comments:

At March 28, 2005 12:45 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
interesting blog you have here :) now will be a regular
 
At March 28, 2005 4:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi Wise Donkey... thanks for visiting! Please come again :-).
 
At March 28, 2005 4:37 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lucretia, there is enough power that is available from the sun, if only we could use it.. perhaps within this century we will be, and then there is the fusion energy. Fossil fuels will be obsolete!
 
At March 28, 2005 4:46 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
I think the fusion energy is the best,but we have to find the way to use.By the way pal,thanks aloooot for your link:)
 
At March 28, 2005 4:50 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
Here's were combining technologies could reap greater benefits:

I understand that a huge chimney-type structure is being built in Australia.

It's a novel take on the wind farm. The chimney will be kilometer high and derives its power by drawing in warm air at the base and then having the warm air rise through the chimney.

You can imagine that after a kilometer, there's quite a gail at the top.

Inside the chimney is an array of turbines that are driven by the ascension of warm air on the interior.

So, what if the surface of such a structure were to be covered in these nanotubes?

Let's face it, a chimney of such size is going to have a fearsome surface area.

Even in arid desert locations -- such a those where this chimney is to be located -- in the morning, the structure would be coated in dew and condensation.

If the surface of the chimney was sufficiently porous, then the nanotubes would get their fill and the power derived there would augment the power of the chimney.

Just me a speculatin' again...
 
At March 28, 2005 5:03 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Thanks a lot Lemna!! And welcome back :-).

Yes, the fusion energy is the best.. but there are still a lot of technological hurdles there :-(. In the meantime, any good method of utilizing the solar energy seems like the best option!
 
At March 28, 2005 5:07 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: any system that exploits the various energy differentials on the planet would be a good thing. For example, there are plans to set up such a tower under the ocean, where something like a Jefferson junction (current flows along a metal strip which has different temperatures at the two ends) would be set up between the warm waters at the top, and cold waters at the bottom.
 
At March 28, 2005 6:31 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
I think of the benefits to the planet and all of us if we would begin to harness these alternatives to fossil fuels. A much healther place for us all.
 
At March 28, 2005 7:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Agreed, Broomhilda. I cant wait for that great day.
 
At March 29, 2005 4:24 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Thanks pal:)
 
At March 29, 2005 6:01 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Blogger is giving me a lot of problems too :(.. I could hardly keep any comments at your page, Gindy.

Lucretia: now I will always know where you are, harharhar :):):).

Lemna, just keep visiting! :D:D.
 

Post a Comment