Saturday, April 30, 2005
This Day:

For the first time, scientists have been able to take a direct (X-Ray) picture of a binary star. The stellar pair (pictured using the Chandra telescope) is some 420 light years away from us. The distance between the stars (Mira A and B) is about twice the distance between Pluto and the Sun.
Mira A is a highly evolved red giant star. Mira B is a white dwarf. Mira A is losing gas rapidly from its upper atmosphere via a stellar wind. Mira B exerts a gravitational tug that creates a gaseous bridge between the two stars. Gas from the wind and bridge accumulates in an accretion disk around Mira B and collisions between rapidly moving particles in the disk produce X-rays.

Mira B (left) and A (Courtesy: Chandra)
The ability to distinguish between the interacting stars allowed a team of scientists to observe an X-ray outburst from Mira A. An ultraviolet image made by the Hubble Space Telescope was key to identifying the X-ray outburst with the red giant star.
Mira A (or simply, Mira) was named "The Wonderful" star in the seventeenth century because its brightness was observed to wax and wane over a period of about 330 days. In this advanced red giant phase of Mira A's life, its diameter has swollen to about 600 times that of the Sun and it is pulsating, due to increasingly energetic nuclear reactions in its core.
X-ray studies of the Mira star system may also provide better understanding of interactions between other binary star systems consisting of a "normal" star and a collapsed star such as a white dwarf, black hole or a neutron star.

(Hide) (Show)

14 Comments:

At May 01, 2005 10:46 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Well,i dint blogroll u just because u did.i did it out of my choice,and u r right,i do understand what u put in here,just that i was never much interested in scietific ideas.Well,now maybe it can become a new found interest.i love learning anyday:)
 
At May 02, 2005 12:54 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Both Hubble and Chandra. They are great tools, and are instrumental in showing us the path of knowledge.

Neelima: Sorry I didnt mean it that way... I know you did it by choice :-). And of course, you can always start learning new things :):):):).
 
At May 02, 2005 1:46 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Thanks pal,really nice post,You know I like binary stars,they remember me some years ago 'n my nice days of lifeeee:)
 
At May 02, 2005 1:47 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
By the way,have then done sth about multi-stars too?Have they found any special information about the interaction between them?
 
At May 02, 2005 2:21 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I love the binaries too... two stars, forever, in tight embrace... as if in love :):). Examples: Sirius and Mira.

But sometimes, one of the stars become a parasite, like in this post...... feeding stuff from its partner...

Hmmm.. multi-stars :):):). Systems with more than two stars are rare, since the gravitational interactions are not always very stable, and even small fluctuations can push two (or more) of the stars to collide and merge. But there are some examples of such stars, as you might know:

Alpha Centauri: A triple star system: but Alpha Centauri A and B form a binary pair, whereas C is a red dwarf far far away (4.22 light years). Such configurations are gravitationally stable, since from a stability point of view, this is similar to two binary systems (A and B, AB and C).

Alcyone: Four-star system - consisting of two binary pairs orbiting at a large distance from each other (stable configuration) in the Pleiades contellation.

Castor: Six-star - but composed of four binary sub-systems... one of the brightest stars in the night.

It has not yet been possible to directly photograph these stars, esp. because the stars are very close to each other, and often one of the stars is very small (a white dwarf, or a black hole, in case of Sirius). But surely, newer and better telescopes will be able to find more about them :):).
 
At May 02, 2005 2:23 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Clarification: No X-Ray image has been previously taken of such orbiting stars... Hubble has taken many pictures, but all in optical.
 
At May 02, 2005 5:21 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
u didnt mention what a binary star is, (well good actually, since i attempted to find what it will be, in wilks.)

and diameter 600 times that of sun amd distance betn 2 twice the dis of sun and pluto,
phewwwwwww :)

but i still didnt understand why the 2 stars would be differently evolved. is it because i havent still comprehended the binary star part?
 
At May 02, 2005 6:15 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Binary star refers to a pair of stars, orbiting each other. Imagine if Jupiter were a star, and there were no other planets, then Sun and Jupiter would make a binary star.

The evolution of stars depend upon their mass. Lighter stars live longer (as they burn the hydrogen much slower), like our Sun. Heavier stars burn faster, and die younger.

When the fuel is nearly finished, stars go through a red-giant stage when they bloat to a huge size (Sun will bloat like that after some 5 billion years). After that, lighter stars (like Sun) become a white dwarf, as the outer layers of the red-giant dissipate. Heavier stars end up as neutron stars, or black holes (after blowing their outer layers with a supernova explosion).
 
At May 02, 2005 8:46 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
thanks understood:)
 
At May 02, 2005 1:25 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
ok..... so why doznt sirius A n B show up in Xray images? Or do they?
 
At May 02, 2005 1:32 PM, Blogger Sray said...
They do show up... but the resolution is not very good, as in the picture for Mira.
 
At May 02, 2005 9:20 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Hey... thanks a lot :-).
 
At May 03, 2005 6:13 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:) Thanks alot for more inf pal:)
 
At May 03, 2005 6:15 AM, Blogger Sray said...
You are welcome, pal :).
 

Post a Comment

Friday, April 29, 2005
This Day:

Scientists at Princeton University have managed to coax bacteria to behave like computers, assembling themselves into complex shapes based on instructions stuffed into their genes. This remarkable feat was achieved by a team led by Ron Weiss, and was published in April 28 issue of the journal Nature.
The research can lead to applications in detecting chemicals, nano-assembly, and full-scale biological computing. It might also lead to techniques allowing spontaneous assembly of new organs :).

Heart from Bacteria! (Courtesy: LiveScience)
The researchers programmed E. coli bacteria to emit red or green fluorescent light in response to a signal emitted from another set of E. coli. The living cells were commanded to make a heart pattern, for example, around central cells based on communication between the bacteria. Other patterns included a bull's eye, and a flower.
Plasmids are circular double-stranded DNA molecules, normally found in bacteria. The scientists modified the genetic code inside certain plasmids, and inserted them into the genome of the bacteria. The bacteria used these synthetic codes to generate proteins, which directed the bacteria to move in certain ways, depending upon where other bacteria were. The proteins achieved this by detecting signals (in form of other chemicals) from other bacteria.
Real-life applications are, of course, years or decades away. But this work does provide a template on which future research could be based. The possibilities are endless :):).

(Hide) (Show)

12 Comments:

At May 01, 2005 1:10 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Hmmm,it is really niceee,can it be April fool?!:D Cuz here in Iran they published many news 'n then said that they were lie!!!:D
 
At May 01, 2005 1:12 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
And the one who is angry with me is whom had clicked on my link given!:D
 
At May 01, 2005 1:13 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Isn't it beautiful?!
 
At May 01, 2005 1:13 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I will tell you later who clicked on the link :D:D.
 
At May 01, 2005 1:29 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Heyy it is beautifulll! Plz say me now who was him/her?!:D I think you yourself!:D Msg me about it:D
 
At May 01, 2005 1:45 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I sent you a mail with the name :D:D.. but I wish the person would disclose him/herself here :):):):).
 
At May 01, 2005 4:27 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
WOW !!
 
At May 01, 2005 6:13 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:))Please gimme uppp pal!:)
 
At May 01, 2005 6:48 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Wow is the right word :)).
 
At May 01, 2005 11:07 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
would it be possible to manipulate parts of our body against the instructions from our brain??? (in future of course)
 
At May 01, 2005 1:09 PM, Blogger Akruti said...
Might sound wierd but dont u think too much of research into this aspect wont leave any diff between humans and computers?? why do we want to behve like computers??
well,i know u might roll u r eyes and sigh and laugh or whatever at the comment:( but couldn help it:))
and i see my blog linked ot urs,thankuuuuuuu and i did the same but i must warn u,i am dumb at scientific news:)
 
At May 01, 2005 8:46 PM, Blogger Sray said...
WD: We already do some of it through our medicines, which interfere with the chemicals that brain-signals induce our body. For example, when we force our body to sleep using pills... we are interfering with the brain's signals!
Large-scale regeneration of body parts (e.g. growing of fingers) might be possible... after all, reptiles can do something similar. Scientists have already been able to manufacture a human ear on the back of a rat (click here!) :):).

Neelima: I enjoy your blog, and so added you to my roll. I did not do it to expect my blog to put on yours in return :):)... thanks a lot for doing so, though! I try to make my descriptions as simple as possible... but if you dont understand something, let me know.
Abt. humans and computers, Ummm.. I believe research has to be done. You never know what great/not-so-great things might result.. but knowledge for knowledge's sake, that is what I sincerely believe in.
We dont want to behave like computers, but if we could regenerate our memory and body effortlessly, it would be really nice!
 

Post a Comment

Thursday, April 28, 2005
This Day:

By studying data from orbiting satellites, ocean buoys, land-based stations, and computer models, scientists from the NASA, Earth Institute at Columbia University, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have concluded that more energy is being absorbed from the Sun than is emitted back to space, throwing the Earth's energy "out of balance" and warming the planet.
The study appears in this week's Science Express. It concludes that this imbalance is (historically) quite large, and will cause an additional warming of 0.6°C by the end of this (21st) century. Although it looks small, even such rise can result in further melting of the ice-caps, thus disrupting some ecosystems, and also flooding some low-lying areas.

Reflected and Emitted radiations (Courtesy: PhysOrg)
In the above picture, the lightest areas represent thick clouds, which both reflect radiation from the Sun and block heat rising from the Earth’s surface. This will cause a greenhouse-style warming of the atmosphere, which will then warm the oceans. As the oceans get warmer, more evaporation takes place, which increases the cloud cover, thus causing further warming.
This imbalance, according to the scientists, is an expected consequence of increasing atmospheric pollution, especially carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, and black carbon particles (soot). These pollutants block the Earth's radiant heat from escaping into space, increasing absorption of sunlight and trapping heat within the atmosphere.
However, the process is quite slow, and thus it might represent an oppurtunity for us to do something to reverse it. Steps need to be taken to reduce the amount of the above chemicals, and then it might still be possible to turn this around.

(Hide) (Show)

14 Comments:

At April 29, 2005 4:19 PM, Blogger wise donkey said...
but when will the steps be taken to prevent it? any goverment taking it seriously and any policy?
 
At April 29, 2005 7:13 PM, Blogger Sray said...
I am sure we will start taking some steps, when it is already too late :-(.
 
At April 30, 2005 12:41 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
The feelin' of sulfishness doesnn allow people 'n mostly the heads to do an action to prevent it:( We cann do anythin',also we cann need to be sad for the others foolishness,If they gonna prevent more pollution, they've to give up many of their profits.There is no concern about human life now,all are thinkin' about themselves.The terrible world,I donn know till when this will continue...They will think of it as when mostly all people in the world has attacked with the cancer 'n it has reached their dearests, but then it is really late for action...
 
At April 30, 2005 12:48 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Heyyy again bad links:D sooo Check this out you will like ittt:D
http://www.geocities.com/sray.rm/alex.html
:D:D:D
 
At April 30, 2005 12:49 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Agreed, dear. People (and politicians) all try to maximize the short-term gain... in the process, we often ignore the long term effects it can have both on us, and on society. As the pace of development and population both increase, the stress on the environment is also increasing. Hopefully, science will be able to solve this grave problem... but I am not very hopeful of that happening before it is already too late :-(.
 
At April 30, 2005 2:45 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Perhaps the ending in my previous comment was too pessimistic. But, science doesnt operate in a vacuum. It often requires a social awareness, which then results in increased fundings in the relevant areas.

For example, the Earth-monitoring satellites of USA are in terrible shape, and the newer ones that were supposed to go up are either delayed or had their funds cut. If we dont have monitoring satellites, we will never have the data to prove the global scale of the problem! And then when the problem is right on us, it will be too late.

Ahhh.. another pessimistic ending :(:(.
 
At April 30, 2005 4:36 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Heyyy pal,nevermind,so it is like that 'n we cann change anythin' dear,so take it easy:)
 
At April 30, 2005 4:46 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
It seems that somebodies are angry with meeeee:D:DI beg your pardon soooo:D
 
At April 30, 2005 6:31 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Angry??!! Noooo :D:D:D. Hmmm... should I be?!
 
At April 30, 2005 8:15 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
"But, science doesnt operate in a vacuum. It often requires a social awareness, which then results in increased fundings in the relevant areas."

I agree. and i wish the mainstream media, could highlight it.
 
At April 30, 2005 8:50 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Mainstream media?! Mainstream media is driven by profits. They show what the public wants to see (or at least sees, even if they wont admit they want to see it). Hence you see this much skin and gossip even on the news channel here in the USA :-(. Makes me sick, when premier channels such as CNN spend hours discussing Michael Jackson's trial.

It is a chicken-and-egg situation. If the media doesnt show, how will the public know there is a problem? The public will know it when the problem is right over their head, and then the media will start covering the aftermath.

The same thing happened with 9/11 tragedy. Throughout the 90s, the media hardly talked abt. Laden and his thugs.. so the public didnt know. Since the public didnt know, the politicians didnt care. And nothing was done!
 
At April 30, 2005 5:31 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Even if global warming weren't true, we must address the supply-side problems, as India and China gobble up more and more resources.

1) One way of doing it is by pushing for hybrid vehicles, which do save a lot of fuel. The big automobile companies should pool their resources, and find a truly 21st century solution for this, instead of just fighting against each other.
2) Nuclear power is an option, but the post-processing of the radioactive waste takes a lot of energy, and I am not sure if it is more economical in the long run.
3) Hydrogen looks a good thing, but I am sure it will work, at least in the short run. To set up so many hydrogen pumps, is a mammoth task, and will consume more energy than it will save.
4) One good solution is using vegetable-waste based fuel, such as ethanol, or vegetable diesel.

About pollutants, there are several possibilities why the concentration chemicals are going up.

1) Of course there is the human factor. Since the dawn of the industrial age, we have released a lot of carbon into the atmosphere, which had previously been locked away. Also, the cutting of forests means that not enough CO2 is being converted back to oxygen.
2) Nature does a lot of damage from time to time. For example, there is a possibility that huge methane deposits under the oceans might erupt at any time. Methane is one of the most potent greenhouse gases! Similarly, volcanic activities release a lot of greenhouse matter from time to time.

Now the question is: is it the human activity to blame? For that, we need to study the ice-cores from the past centuries, and see how the climate changed in different parts of the world. It seems that our century has been warmer than most others, and since there is no preponderance of natural activity in the 20th century, the only other factor that we are left with, is the human factor.

There is not much we can do to limit the man-made pollutants right now. But the first step has be awareness of the problem, and acknowledging that a problem exists. Then the governments will be able to pour lots of funds, and perhaps we will see a solution.

Once fantastic option is the fusion power, which should mature by say 2050, and if fuel-cells mature by then, these two combined can solve a lot of problems.
 
At May 01, 2005 11:02 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
well i am not a person who understands technical stuff, but still find your blog and the info u post interesting.

in fact i had given the link to some of my friends, and though they dont comment, they did read and agreed its interesting.

its just a myth that people are interested only in skin shows and celebrities. and yeah even i am tired of the endless attention to jackson trial :(

today people trust the media, more than the govt and think the media will mention if there is a prob, but the media just sticks to myths:(
 
At May 02, 2005 1:30 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Abt. the pooling in of resources by big auto companies... I agree that a competitive system works far better. What I was trying to suggest is that sometimes, you dont have to reinvent the wheel. A way has to be found to avoid that.
 

Post a Comment

Wednesday, April 27, 2005
This Day:

Sixty-nine days before it gets up close and personal with a comet, NASA’s Deep Impact spacecraft successfully photographed its quarry, comet Tempel 1, at a distance of 39.7 million miles.
The image is the first one of a number of such images that will be received from the craft in the next few weeks, and will aid the navigators of the craft to better plot its course, and avoid collisions/encounter with any rogue rocks.

Comet Tempel 1 (Courtesy: NASA)
Deep Impact is comprised of two parts, a "flyby" spacecraft and a smaller "impactor." The impactor will be released into the comet’s path for a planned high-speed collision on July 4. The crater produced by the impact could range in size from the width of a large house up to the size of a football stadium and from 2 to 14 stories deep. Ice and dust debris will be ejected from the crater, revealing the material beneath.
The Deep Impact spacecraft has four data collectors to observe the effects of the collision - a camera and infrared spectrometer comprise the High Resolution Instrument, a Medium Resolution Instrument, and a duplicate of that camera on the impactor (called the Impactor Targeting Sensor-ITS) that will record the vehicle’s final moments before it is run over by comet Tempel 1 at a speed of about 23,000 miles per hour.

(Hide) (Show)

17 Comments:

At April 29, 2005 8:56 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
The one thing I found most intriguing about this managed collision is that no one is quite sure if the collision is likely to knock the rock inwards towards the Earth.

Scary...
 
At April 29, 2005 9:02 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa.. but I think the chances of that happening are quite small. But one possibility is that if the collision fractured the comet, some pieces of it might head towards earth.
 
At April 29, 2005 9:53 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
I was going to ask about the impact and the possibility of changing the trajectory of the rock or break up, however, it seems that Wayne has beat me to the first part and you Sray beat me to the second.
So now, I have nothing to comment on. Thanks Guys! lol
 
At April 29, 2005 9:59 AM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL, Broomhilda :-)... but seriously, scientists will be able to learn a lot about comets and what they are really made of... and how to tackle one if it came too close for comfort. So this experiment has a lot of really practical benefits!

I just wish I could stand on the surface of a comet. That will be really cool :-).
 
At April 29, 2005 11:13 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
You know, it occurs to me there's a lot out there we don't know about, and in order to find out we seem to spend a lot of time firing things at things.

One of these days, a thing that we've fired something at is going to fire back. Then we'll be sorry!

And judging by the possibility of fractured comets triggering worldwide devastation, this could be one of those times!

Still.... I'm sure somebody's already thought of a plan.
 
At April 29, 2005 11:16 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"I just wish I could stand on the surface of a comet. That will be really cool :-)."

Oh look, that little metal object is approaching from the blue planet down there. Hey's it's really going quite fast isn't it - I wonder if it will be friends with me? BOOM!

Hehehehe, it's a sunny Friday afternoon here with a public holiday on Monday. I'm demob happy!
 
At April 29, 2005 11:30 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Visions of comet surfing Sray? :)
 
At April 29, 2005 12:30 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Onkroes: Do you have to be so sarcastic all the time?! LOL :-)...
But yaa, it is true that there is a small chance of us messing up the comet so that some piece comes rushing at us, but I am quite sure the scientists will keep the impact angle such that the chances would be quite low.

Broomhilda: yup!! Perhaps your solar sail can be of help here :D:D.
 
At April 29, 2005 2:41 PM, Blogger Sray said...
The pictures should be great. Especially since the flyby craft should be there :-).
 
At April 29, 2005 4:07 PM, Blogger wise donkey said...
:))
hmmm i cant think of askin anything else..

and comet surfing hmmmmmmmmm:D
 
At April 30, 2005 12:42 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
I donn mind of the attack of the small parts of it:D Nevermind pals,no need to be concerned!Think of the joy the photos will brin' for us:)
 
At April 30, 2005 12:51 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Small parts of it will get vaporized in the atmosphere, giving us some really nice meteor showers :D:D:D. Ever seen a meteor shower? I was awake at 3:00AM in the morning once, at -15C (brrrrr), and it was worth the wait :):):).
 
At April 30, 2005 4:39 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:D It will be nice seein' that showerin' pal:D 'n you have to be asleep at 3:00am pal:D
 
At April 30, 2005 6:32 AM, Blogger Sray said...
To see such nice things, I can be awake the whole night :):). Next time there is a shower, make sure you see it too!
 
At May 01, 2005 1:02 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:D I will sleeeeeeeppppp:D
 
At May 01, 2005 1:14 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Dont!! Let me know, and I will wake you up :D:D.
 
At May 02, 2005 12:13 PM, Blogger Sray said...
2029, eh? We will learn quite a lot about your ship by then... so you wont be able to surprise us this time :D.
 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, April 26, 2005
This Day:

Humans need almost 8 hours of sleep per day. Some people enjoy sleeping (like me!), but when you think about it, sleeping for a third of your lifetime sounds like a awful waste of time :(. Now scientists at the University of Wisconsin have discovered a possible mutation in a single gene in the fruit-fly (Drosophila Melanogaster) genome, that allows the flies to get 30% less sleep than their normal counterparts!
The finding is important, as it might point to possible mutations in the human genome that might help us control sleep, and also shed light on human sleep needs. This fruit-fly gene has a counterpart in animal (and human) genome; so such a mutation might just be possible in humans too :).

Fruit Fly (Courtesy: University of Guelph)
Chiara Cirelli and colleagues discovered that flies with one particular gene variant, dubbed minisleep, needed only 3 or 4 hours’ rest per day, compared to 10 to 12 hours for a normal fly. The most interesting part: the flies, despite all the sleep deprivation, showed no sign of impairment.
They were also able to go without any sleep for much longer periods of time. The minisleep mutation is in a gene called Shaker, which codes for a protein that forms part of an ion channel in nerve cells. The same protein is found in mammals, and might serve the same function as in flies.
If we were able to conquer sleep, it might be helpful in a lot of ways. In particular, it will help those among us who always feel sleepy (including some of the readers here :D:D, you know who you are!), and also help people working odd or late hours, and of course the military might be really interested.

(Hide) (Show)

21 Comments:

At April 28, 2005 1:11 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
I couldnn comment you last night!It gave me error.Whyyy???
 
At April 28, 2005 4:05 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Blogger has problems sometimes.. due to server load and what-not :-).
 
At April 28, 2005 4:25 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
"conquer sleep"

Hmmmmm. I understand some scientists believe sleep is a necessary 'reset device' the brain uses to sort thoughts out and re-assign pathways (from memory). If there was no sleep they theorise that people would actually go insane over time.

Have you heard of a "russian sleep" unit? I think it's just sci-fi at the moment (and every day more sci-fi things are becoming reality) but it's a device to 'force' REM sleep. If you combined the two advances that may work!
 
At April 28, 2005 4:39 AM, Blogger Sray said...
You might be right... a lot of things happen during sleep. For example, Research has found that studying for exams and then sleeping helps retain more for the long-term.

"Russian Sleep" machine thing is interesting :))... but I dont know if the two (the machine, and the minisleep mutation) can be combined.

By the way, there are mammals who sleep much much less than we do, and are still quite active. The question is: why do we sleep so much? Why did we evolve like this?
 
At April 28, 2005 6:49 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
:)) that too from a fruit fly!!

i just find it so funny and at the same time so useful :D

whats the russian sleep machine? any link on it?
 
At April 28, 2005 6:57 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Fruit flies are a favorite for biologists, as a) they reproduce very rapidly b) their genes mutate quite fast c) Many common genes with us :).

Russian Sleep Machine: I am not sure it works... it might be partly a hype/legend. For more info, click here.
 
At April 28, 2005 1:30 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa. me neither.. especially if it involves germ-line genomes. But it is nice to know what all can be done :-).
 
At April 28, 2005 3:19 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Me too :-). Even though I enjoy sleeping, it would be nice to control it when deadlines are near, and there is a lot of work to be done :-).

Well, perhaps I shouldnt keep postponing work till the last minute before deadlines :)).
 
At April 28, 2005 5:39 PM, Blogger Deb said...
My Dad is one of those rare individuals who needs very little sleep. That was the case when he was younger, at any rate. 4 hours per night was his comfortable routine.

I used to think I was unfortunate not to have inherited that trait. But now I think my subconscious world is equally valuable. Whatever my subconscience needs to work its magic is OK with me! I value my sleep time for more than just rest.

onkroes: Yes, sleep deprivation causes insanity. One of my kids was colicky, so I know!!
 
At April 28, 2005 5:43 PM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL!! Well, we all wish that from time to time, dont we? :-).
 
At April 28, 2005 7:08 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Oops, my previous comment was answer to "nothing like it"...

Deb, another interesting thing is: as people grow older, they need less and less sleep. But they are still quite active! Why cant that happen when we are younger? That is a mystery to me.
 
At April 29, 2005 2:00 AM, Blogger Akruti said...
Came here to tell u my exp today morning:),hope u dont laughout loudly,My mom was trying to wake me up at 8am in the morning and i was told her in a sleepy voice "what ma,u know yesterday i read in a blog,humans need eight hour sleep,i am trying to follow it" And pat came the answer "whoever it is,they must be talking abt humans,u dont come into the category,wakeup right now or i will put a bucket water on u:(((( " Well,i was refering to ur blog,have a greatday:)
 
At April 29, 2005 6:06 AM, Blogger Sray said...
:)):)).... as you can see from my picture, I am not a human either :D:D... so the research applies to neither of us :D:D.

Good one :)):)).
 
At April 29, 2005 9:24 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
"Hmmmmm. I understand some scientists believe sleep is a necessary 'reset device' the brain uses to sort thoughts out and re-assign pathways (from memory)."

Yes.

Your short-term memory is moved into long-term memory during sleep.

Your dreams are essentially a visual representation of your brain filing your thoughts and experiences.

Lack of sleep is one of the reasons why people hallucinate; their brains are trying to do an emerging back-up!

As I understand it, the brain needs a chemical called Seratonin [among others], but it's only produced during sleep when much of the brain is switched off or in low power mode.

This chemical is needed for muscle functions, that's why you ache when you're tired.

This is where Sray either corrects or fills out the details...

I remember watching a television program about narcolepsy, now that is weird. Just nodding off without warning.

It seems that the default state of the brain is at rest. Being awake requires effort. So with the average narcoleptic, the power switch is faulty and keeps breaking and going back to 'off' when it should be 'on'.

Not good!
 
At April 29, 2005 2:53 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Wayne: You are exactly right. When we sleep, our brain reorganizes whatever we learnt and experienced that day. It also makes the brain 'absorb' the experiences into your personality, for example, if you learnt swimming on that day, you will find that after waking up, you are swimming with less conscious effort.

Abt. serotonin. It is one of the major neuro-transmitters in the brain. Decreased levels of serotonin can cause body ache, and depression. Serotonin is given as an antidote for depression, and is also one reason why we go to sleep when on anti-depressants. Conversely, without serotonin, our thinking abilities are often impaired.

Gindy: I am sure experiments have been done with soldiers. It is not hard to stay awake. The problem is: people become zombies, and you dont want zombie soldiers! What the mutation might do is allow you to be alert, and aware of what is going on around you.

But one side-effect for the fruit-flies, that I just found out in a BBC article, was that the mutated flies (with less sleep) died earlier than others :-(:-(.
 
At April 29, 2005 11:48 PM, Blogger LEMNA said...
:DSo that is meeeee:D:D:D who was that reader whom needs sleep?!:D Emmm,so send me the gene then I can stay awake durin' the night:D 'n never feel sleepy in the company:D Emmmm, I need about 100 years of sleep:D
 
At April 30, 2005 12:38 AM, Blogger Sray said...
It will be nice, pal... but this gene also reduces one's life-span :-(. So, right now, it is not of much use, is it?
 
At April 30, 2005 4:44 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Nevermind about the life-span:)No use now:D
 
At May 01, 2005 5:18 AM, Blogger Wayne Smallman said...
"By the way, it reminds me of an X-Files episode (I don't know if you watch it)"

Yes, I saw that one.

The soldier was non other than B-movie star Tony Todd...
 
At May 06, 2005 5:19 PM, Blogger Sray said...
:)):))... yes, I have read it. I would recommend the book The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris. A must-read for all Kansasians ;-);-).
 
At May 21, 2007 1:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Ah, that's grat. Hopefully they'll soon find a way to modify the human DNA in such way. So that we can work longer (fore the same money) for better profits of the corporations.
 

Post a Comment

Monday, April 25, 2005
This Day:

In Biology, a traditional approach to looking at something really small, is to put the specimen on a slide, and peer at it through a microscope. Even though the invention of the microscope (by Anton van Leeuwenhoek) has revolutionized the Biological sciences, the process of watching specimens under a microscope is very cumbersome. Also, a microscope is not easy to carry everywhere, and thus its use has mostly been limited to a laboratory setup. Now, a team of scientists, funded by Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC) and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) have developed optical biochips :), that could lead to faster development of new drugs and quicker medical tests.

Red Laser in an optical bio-chip (Courtesy: BBSRC)
Biological samples will be place directly on an optical chip (which is no larger than a single cell), equipped with a laser. Special fluorescent chemicals are then used together with these lasers to allow the scientists to analyse the cells or targets within the cells. This technique can be used to analyse cell interior and look for deformities. This also raises the possibility of a micro-laboratory the size of a credit card, which would be able to perform medical diagnostics, improving patient treatment by reducing the number of hospital visits needed for tests.
Perhaps one day, we all will carry credit card sized toolkit in our wallets, which will need only a bit of saliva to analyse our state of health :):).
The research is being carried out at the Wales College of Medicine and involves researchers at Cardiff University, University of Bangor, the Gray Cancer Institute in London and collaboration with the University of Warwick and laboratories in the United States.

(Hide) (Show)

19 Comments:

At April 27, 2005 3:27 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Our state of health?!Wow,is it really needed?!:DI think then we will fall in mental diseases as we see a little problem.
 
At April 27, 2005 3:29 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I agree. But then again, it might be able to catch serious diseases (like cancer) much earlier than now.

Like all things, it can have both good and bad applications. Imagine if someone takes a cup that you drank from, and then found out about your health from the residue on it!
 
At April 27, 2005 4:03 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
think it would be wonderful:)

btw fyi
http://women.indiatimes.com/quickies/msid-1075509.cms
 
At April 27, 2005 4:19 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Damn these men :-(. And he is a public relations executive :)).

I wonder what his wife (if he is married) thinks?!
 
At April 27, 2005 5:23 AM, Blogger Onkroes said...
hypochondria here we come!

It's bad enough having to 'feel yourself' for lumps, etc, without having to collect your own saliva.

Some people would say "but it'll save lives", and how can I argue?

Anyway, it might be credit card sized, but chances are it'll cost plenty, and there's no way at the moment that you could analyse it fully and display that analysis in a meaningful manner, on something the size of a credit card.

Imagine the scene. Man takes credit card lab from pocket and spits on it. After a moment, green letters start to shine out on the surface "you're going to live". Hurray.

sorry, I'm in a sarcastic mood today
 
At April 27, 2005 5:27 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I said saliva, but it could also be sweat (or anything that has at least a few cells/serum).

It will definitely cost plenty in the beginning. But costs always come down with mass production/usage.

And it need not be displayed on the card itself. It might send the data to your pocket pc/laptop etc., or perhaps a audible message will do?

Hmmm... I can already imagine a voice coming from the card: "Thou shalt not live..."

:D:D:D:D.
 
At April 27, 2005 5:55 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Happppppy new photoooo:D:D:D
 
At April 27, 2005 6:00 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
You have get young in one day pal:D
 
At April 27, 2005 6:03 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Is it needed to catch cancer sooner?!:D Hey,it is not good for someone to drink from my glass:-wIt is bad:D S/he will catch IV then:D:D:D
 
At April 27, 2005 6:05 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Never mind pal,whether you can live longer or shorter!You have to enjoy this life:D
 
At April 27, 2005 6:05 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Never mind pal,whether you can live longer or shorter!You have to enjoy this life:D
 
At April 27, 2005 6:32 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
sray:)) well if u had clicked next, u would have come across more:) i would like to think he will remain without spouse or girlfriend, but then when has life been fair:d


===
on the post, well if its massproduced and becomes cheap, think it will make a difference to the rural healthcare too..
 
At April 27, 2005 7:50 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Lemna, that photo shows my mental age :D:D:D:D.

Sure you do have to enjoy this life, longer or shorter... but you need a healthy body and a healthy mind :):). Dont you think so?
 
At April 27, 2005 7:50 AM, Blogger Sray said...
WD: I did see all of them :)). Hilarious, isnt it? All of these guys are in respectable positions, and are supposedly educated. Hmmph!
 
At April 27, 2005 10:09 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Sray,
You've gotten so much cuter and younger. You've been playing around with the regeneration formula again haven't you?
 
At April 27, 2005 10:27 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hahahaha Broomhilda :). If it goes at this rate, soon I will vanish :D.
 
At April 27, 2005 7:45 PM, Blogger Sray said...
No... the chip is all you need. The chip itself will have the chemicals... when you put the sample on the chip, the chemicals with color it, and the laser will analyse the cell spectra and find out which chemicals/cell-structures are present.
 
At April 27, 2005 8:59 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Well! I think it will say "Thou haveth 49.0236% probability of surviving the next 48 hours". (Sorry, I dunno how to carry the Shakesearen accent thruout the sentence1)
 
At April 27, 2005 9:40 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Do thou haveth no shame, sir, to condemn an innocent man to death in such horrendous a fashion?

:D.
 

Post a Comment

Sunday, April 24, 2005
This Day:

Today is Hubble's 15th birthday :):):). The Hubble Space Telescope is an optical telescope, orbiting the Earth at the outer reaches of the atmosphere. Launched in 1990, it is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble, who discovered the red-shifts in spectra of distant galaxies, which proved that the universe was indeed expanding. The Hubble is supposed to work till 2009, after which it should be replaced by the James Webb Space Telescope.

Spiral galaxy M51 or NGC-5194 (Courtesy: HubbleSite)
The Hubble orbits the Earth once every 97 minutes, is 13.2 meters long, and weighs 11,000 kilograms. Over the last 15 years, it has brought us the universe, and has helped push the sciences of astrophysics and cosmology light years ahead. Currently plagued with various problems, including failing gyroscopes (devices that keep the Hubble properly oriented so as to be able to take sharp pictures with long exposure times), Hubble keeps going :).
I still remember the day when the Hubble was launched as part of the payload of the shuttle Discovery. Soon crippled due to a problematic mirror, the Hubble was heroically brought back to good health by a service mission (STS-61) in 1993. Further missions to Hubble in 1997 (STS-82), 1999 (STS-103) and 2002 (STS-109) constantly upgraded the telescope, and kept it in a great running condition :).
However, if nothing is done soon, Hubble is doomed :(. A mission, due to be in February 2005, was scrapped after the Columbia disaster. Limping on failing equipments, Hubble might finally undergo a deorbit, and be crashed in the Pacific Ocean in a fireball. Perhaps a fitting end to a fantastic equipment, that has photographed many a fireballs in space, and has expanded our understanding of the cosmos to new heights as never before.
Happy Birthday, Hubble. I wish you lived longer :(.

(Hide) (Show)

15 Comments:

At April 26, 2005 3:36 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Yaa. But I am not at all hopeful :(:(.
 
At April 26, 2005 7:07 AM, Blogger LEMNA said...
Heyy cann they take it back 'n after arrangin' it,send it again to its orbit??Maybe another one is under construction!Happpppyyy Birthday Hubble,run away after they make you fallll:D
 
At April 26, 2005 7:10 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Too costly, pal :-(. They are designing another one (James Webb Space Telescope) but that wont be ready I think till 2011. And the way this country is going, who knows? They might cut its funding :((.
 
At April 26, 2005 7:44 AM, Blogger wise donkey said...
Happy Birthday Hubble:)
agree with ur post:)
 
At April 26, 2005 10:25 AM, Blogger Sray said...
I wish US congress would do something about it :-(.
 
At April 26, 2005 12:49 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Happy Birthday Dear Hubble, Thank You for all the Beautiful pictures, the wonderful data and the inspiration.
Now, quickly, hide!
 
At April 26, 2005 12:51 PM, Blogger Sray said...
Do some spells Broomhilda... let Hubble live again :-).
 
At April 26, 2005 2:18 PM, Blogger Sray said...
And the crazy thing is: it doesnt take much to keep it working. Just imagine how much work and funds it took to get Hubble up there! Now, with such a small input, we could make Hubble at its current potential for a long time, and they wont do it :-(.
 
At April 26, 2005 7:06 PM, Blogger Onkroes said...
Who actually owns Hubble? Is it NASA? Is it the US government? Or some other organisation?

Assuming whoever owns it has decided it isn't economic (for them) to maintain it, isn't there anyone else who would be prepared to "take it off their hands" for a nominal fee (or even free) and maintain it from now on?

Do you know of any petitions to keep it running? Or is this all sentimental hogwash (i.e. will the James Webb Space Telescope be so much better we'll all wonder what the fuss was about Hubble?).

Sorry sray, I'm all questions today ;-)
 
At April 26, 2005 7:21 PM, Blogger broomhilda said...
alas, spell work can only do so much. Nothing works 100%
 
At April 26, 2005 7:23 PM, Blogger Sray said...
All good questions.. so let me try answering them one by one.

Hubble is owned by NASA, and therefore by the US Government. It would be nice if someone else could take Hubble and maintain it, but it will not happen for many reasons:
a) The expertise for maintaining Hubble lie withing NASA, Kennedy Space Center, and UCLA. These groups are also working on newer telescopes, and therefore are not available for any third-party assignments.
b) It requires enormous amounts of money. In a way, pure scientific research is funded by the public, as it takes several years/decades for the benefits to start showing up.
c) Intellectual secrets involved in design and maintenance of Hubble would make it impossible for NASA to part with its internal designs.

Petitions: I know of this one, but seriously, signing petitions never does much good :-(. Perhaps people need to call up their congressmen and women.

James Webb Space Telescope will be far better. But it wont launch (as per current schedule) till 2011. Also, one can't really trust the US congress and NASA... who knows when the plug to that will be pulled?
 
At April 26, 2005 7:25 PM, Blogger Sray said...
LOL Broomhilda, even a little will do. Perhaps you can put a spell on your senator or congressman/woman ;-);-), so that he/she does something abt. Hubble!
 
At April 26, 2005 11:06 PM, Blogger Unknown said...
Happy B'day Hubble! *sob*
 
At April 27, 2005 12:07 AM, Blogger Sray said...
Hi, Sudhir! Please come again :-).
 
At April 27, 2005 10:11 AM, Blogger broomhilda said...
Sray, I cannot and will not interfere with the free will of others...that's dark magick...something I do not practise.
 

Post a Comment